Dearborn Muslim sues Little Caesars for $100 MILLION over a pizza

Jihad everywhere, from the smallest minutia of daily life to blowing up children at a pop concert. It’s all of a piece (in this case a piece of pizza). It’s all work and war in the cause of Islam.

Litigation jihad. We see this in hundreds of lawsuits against America’s great businesses and corporations — Wal-Mart, Target, Disney, Abercrombie and Fitch, Hertz, Amazon, Heinz and many more. Islamic lawsuits to impose Islam on the marketplace and the workplace. I’ve been warning about this for years. You can read about it, and find tips for resisting it, in my book, Stop the Islamization of America.

Mind you, he ordered the pizza with pepperoni, twice. And even if he didn’t, dhimmis (or sub-humans under Islam) cannot ever make a mistake in accordance with sharia (Islamic law).

The lawsuit is frivolous and totally without merit. But that doesn’t mean he won’t win in a left-wing courtroom.

MUSLIM MAN SUES LITTLE CAESARS OVER PIZZA

Arkansas Online, May 26, 2017 (thanks to Robert N):

DEARBORN, MICH. — A MUSLIM MAN WHO SAYS LITTLE CAESARS SERVED HIM A PIZZA WITH PEPPERONI MADE WITH PORK HAS FILED A LAWSUIT SEEKING $100 MILLION.

The Detroit Free Press reported that the lawsuit filed Thursday in Wayne County Circuit Court says the pizza sold in the Detroit suburb of Dearborn was labeled “halal,” meaning it shouldn’t contain pork and would be prepared in a way that follows Islamic law.

A Little Caesars statement said the chain “cherishes our customers from all religions and cultures” and believes the lawsuit is “without merit.”

The lawsuit seeks class-action status. It said Mohamad Bazzi twice ordered “halal” pizza containing pork.

His attorney, Majed Moughni, said the lawsuit aims to deter others from accidentally ordering food containing pork from the restaurant. Dearborn has a large Muslim population.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Ramadan Bomb-a-thon: ISIS Threatens Las Vegas Strip on New Video “Credible Threat”

“ATTACK THEM IN THEIR HOMES”: ISIS calls for Ramadan jihad

Ramadan begins in Afghanistan: Muslim murder 18 with jihad suicide car bomb

Philippines: Islamic State jihadis capture and murder nine Christians

CCTV shows Manchester bomber sauntering towards gig on night of attack

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Profile of an ‘evil loser in life’

President Donald J. Trump during his campaign used the term “radical Islamic terrorism.” Upon becoming the President he has now visited three nations that are the birth places to the world’s three major religions: Saudi Arabia (Mecca – Islam), Israel (Jerusalem – Judaism and Bethlehem – Christianity) and Rome, Italy (seat of the Bishop of Rome and leader of the Catholic Church).

CBS News and the Manchester police have confirmed that the man who blew himself up at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England, was 23-year-old Salman Abedi, a Libyan Muslim, who was known to British authorities prior to the attack.

During his speech in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, President Trump rejected the basic tenant of Islam – martyrdom. It is prophetic that while in Bethlehem, the birth place of Jesus Christ, standing next to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, President Trump said:

So many young, beautiful innocent people – living and enjoying their lives – murdered by evil losers in life.  I won’t call them monsters because they would like that term. I will call them losers from now on – because that is what they are – losers.

This is what I’ve spent these last few days talking about during my trip oversees – our society can have no tolerance for this continuation of bloodshed, we cannot stand a moment longer for the slaughter of innocent citizens.

The terrorists and extremists, and those who give them aid and comfort, must be driven out from our society forever. This wicked ideology must be obliterated, and innocent life must be protected.  All civilized nations must join together to protect human life and the sacred right of our citizens to live in safety and peace.

What is prophetic is that the Palestinian authority pays terrorists, and their families $140 million a year via a Palestinian Authority Martyrs Fund. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has lashed out at the Palestinians for paying families of suicide bombers.

President Trump’s first major speech overseas was in the heart of Islam, Saudi Arabia. While many will analyse the speech from various angles, I believe the most important sentence in the speech made by the President was:

If you choose the path of terror, your life will be empty, your life will be brief, and your soul will be condemned.

This one sentence denies the most basic tenant of Islam – martyrdom.

The followers of Mohammed believe that they must die in the ongoing holy war against the non-believers. The Quran (4:74) reads:

“Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.”

The only guaranteed way for a follower of Mohammed to enter paradise is to fight and die in the way of Allah – martyrdom.

President Trump understands this. The question is do other world leaders?

RELATED ARTICLES: 

Abbas and Palestinian Authority Honor Terrorists Amid Trump Visit by IPT New

Manchester bombing shows Donald Trump is right

Why the British Terror Threat Will Not Improve Soon

Tortured Muslim Child Marriage Victim Tied to Chair, Set on Fire, Dies

Child marriage is legal for Sri Lankan Muslims.

“[The Muslim child-wife] faced serious physical abuse and psychological trauma after the marriage and had reached out to a colleague a month ago asking for information in obtaining a divorce ….

Later it was learnt that she also went to the police who mediated and reconciled she and her husband and sent her back to him, despite grave danger of further abuse.

As numerous scholars on Islam have made clear: Few things are more abundantly attested in Islamic law than the permissibility of child marriage. Islamic tradition records that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage. Robert Spencer elucidates here:

“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).

Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).

Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.

Marrying young girls was not all that unusual for its time, but because in Islam Muhammad is the supreme example of conduct (cf. Qur’an 33:21), he is considered exemplary in this unto today. And so in April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.

Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:

The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.

Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”

According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.

Thameem Fatheema Sharmila

TORTURED SRI LANKAN MUSLIM CHILD MARRIAGE VICTIM DIES, POLICE SOFT-PEDALS CAPTURE OF MURDEROUS HUSBAND

By Colombo Telegraph, May 21, 2017 (thanks to Religion of Peace):

SRI LANKAN MUSLIM CHILD MARRIAGE VICTIM, THAMEEM FATHEEMA SHARMILA HAS DIED LAST NIGHT AFTER BEING TIED TO A CHAIR, POURED OIL AND SET ON FIRE BY HER ABUSIVE HUSBAND LAST FRIDAY.

Activist had been calling the husband to be arrested so he can face justice in courts.

“The police is yet to arrest the husband who is accused of burning a 4 months pregnant teenager alive. It is actually a double homicide.” a spokeswoman of Women’s Action Network today told Colombo Telegraph.

Sharmila a young 18 year old Muslim girl was four months pregnant and lost her baby. She is also the young mother of a 7-month old baby.

She is also a victim of forced child marriage, which is legal for Sri Lankan Muslims. She was 16 years old when was taken to the Nallanthaluwa Kodi Palli Mosque in Munthal, Puttalam and forced to marry Mohamed Imran who was 22 years old. Marrying against her will, Sharmila did not know that Imran was already married twice before and she was his third wife. She never received a marriage certificate as the nikah was not registered by the men officiating the marriage ceremony.

Writing to Colombo Telegraph yesterday, Shreen Abdul Saroor, founder member of Mannar Women’s Development Federation and Women’s Action Network said: “She faced serious physical abuse and psychological trauma after the marriage and had reached out to a colleague a month ago asking for information in obtaining a divorce via the Quazi courts, but never came back again. Later it was learnt that she also went to the police who mediated and reconciled she and her husband and sent her back to him, despite grave danger of further abuse.

“After the attempted murder of his wife, Mohamed Imran took away their 7 month-old baby threatening her that if she reported the incident as being his fault that he would harm the baby as well. Sharmila in her moments of waking consciousness was concerned only about her baby. Fortunately the baby is now safe with other family members but Mohamed Imran is on the run from the police.”

“It is unbearable to see the young lives of Sri Lankan Muslim women being destroyed because of the lack of legal protection of their rights. Sharmila was both a victim of her husband but also a victim of the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act (MMDA) and the Constitution, which does not (yet) protect her rights. What did this child do to deserve this fate? Was it her fault that she was born Muslim in Sri Lanka?” Shreen questioned.

“This happened because of the flawed and inadequate laws in the country specially Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act and Domestic Violence Act, growing religious fundamentalism and structures like mosques and Quazi courts playing with women’s rights and of course negligence of the police. Let’s see what the court will do?”, Shreen Abdul Saroor told Colombo Telegraph.

Her funeral will be held today morning in Thillaiyady, Puttalam.

RELATED VIDEO: Islam, Child Marriage, and the Washington Post

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Muslim migrant goes on stabbing spree at Milan train station

Anti-terrorism police are now looking into whether he has links with militant groups, the investigative source said, in a separate line of investigation from the attempted murder inquiry.

Ismail Hosni’s Facebook page was shut down.

In another report which is “unedited by Business Standards Staff,” it is revealed that Hosni’s Facebook profile, under his own name, “contained Islamic State propaganda videos and posts praising the jihadist group.” In that same report, Milan Police Commissioner Marcello Cardona states that Hosni was not “psychologically imbalanced.”

The West can expect many more incidents of jihad terror like this one, especially since ‘islamophobia’ remains a bigger crime than attacking Western innocents.

“Italy investigates Milan station attacker for alleged terrorism – source”, Reuters, May 19, 2017:

MILAN (Reuters) – Italian prosecutors are investigating a man who stabbed a policeman and two army officers at Milan’s main train station for alleged international terrorism, an investigative source said on Friday.

Police said Ismail Hosni, 20, attacked the three men on Thursday night after they asked to see his identity papers. None of the three suffered life-threatening injuries.

Video released by police showed the injured officers taking hold of Hosni and pushing him to the ground before other patrol staff intervened.

Hosni, who has dual Italian and Tunisian nationality and was born in Milan, was arrested after the attack and faces possible attempted murder charges.

Anti-terrorism police are now looking into whether he has links with militant groups, the investigative source said, in a separate line of investigation from the attempted murder inquiry.

Investigators closed down a Facebook page believed to have belonged to Hosni, which contained videos praising hardline Islamic State militants.

All three injured officials were taken to hospital…..

RELATED ARTICLES:

UK: Whitehall jihadi terror suspect refuses lawyer because he is “represented by Allah”

Audio: Robert Spencer on the Jon Gaunt Show on Muslim rape gangs and being poisoned in Iceland

Assassination: ‘The Left fills those whom it brainwashes with hate’

I wrote here about my having been poisoned by a Leftist in Iceland:

Not only does the Left fill those whom it brainwashes with hate, but it does so while portraying its enemies as the hatemongers, such that violent Leftists such as the young man who drugged me feel righteous as they victimize and brutalize for the crime of disagreement.

I have no doubt whatsoever that whoever poisoned me in Iceland went away feeling happy over what he had done. If he told anyone what he did, I’m sure he was hailed as a hero. I’m also aware that many who read this will crow and exult in knowing that someone who hates my opposition to jihad terror and Sharia oppression made me seriously ill. This is how degenerate and evil the Left has become.

And here comes this Icelander “Robbi” to prove my point. He thinks he is kind to everyone. He thinks he is righteous. But the Left’s rhetoric has so dehumanized his enemies in his eyes that he thinks abusing them, and no doubt physically brutalizing them also, is good and right. For years I have noted that the Left carries out relentless character assassination against those whom it hates, with the intention of discrediting us utterly, without debate or examination of our ideas.

Now I see that the endpoint of this operation is not just that we be silenced, but that we be dead. Character assassination was first, and as my being poisoned in Iceland shows, now the Left is beginning to move on to the next level: actual assassination.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Robert Spencer in PJ Media: On Mideast Policy, the Swamp Drains Trump

Trump jumps into the swamp, extends “worst deal ever,” renews sanctions relief for Islamic Republic of Iran

Medical report confirms that Robert Spencer was poisoned in Iceland

“Doctor confirms poisoning of prominent Islam critic,” by Art Moore, WND, May 17, 2017:

A medical report confirms prominent Islam expert Robert Spencer’s claim that he was drugged by an Icelander in the island nation’s capital after giving a speech on Islam and the future of European culture.

As WND reported, Spencer believes someone who recognized him at the restaurant where he dined after the speech last Thursday approached him, declaring himself to be a fan, and slipped drugs in his drink.

Spencer said that about 15 minutes later, when he returned to his hotel room, “I began to feel numbness in my face, hands and feet. I began trembling and vomiting. My heart was racing dangerously. I spent the night in a Reykjavik hospital.”

The doctor states in his one-page report, dated May 12, that Spencer tested “positive for amphetamine and MDMA.”

Reykjavik journalist Hjálmar Friðriksson, who reports for the local news service DV, alerted WND to a copy of Spencer’s medical report that he obtained, which was written in English.

MDMA, commonly known as “ecstasy,” typically causes an increase in heart rate.

Spencer told WND that the doctor “tried to downplay what happened,” but the report makes it clear he was drugged.

“He said I had a panic attack,” said Spencer, noting it’s a symptom of MDMA overdose.

“I’ve never had a panic attack in my life, even after jihadis attacked our event in Garland,” he said. “Also, why would I have a panic attack after a successful event?”

Spencer was referring to the free-speech event he co-hosted in Garland, Texas, in May 2015 that was attacked by jihadists allied with ISIS. WND reported from the scene.

“I can only surmise that the doctor knew who I was and didn’t want me to use the incident to make the Icelandic left look bad,” Spencer told WND.

“When he spoke to me, he mentioned only Ritalin, and seemed skeptical when I told him I had never taken Ritalin.”

Spencer said the doctor didn’t mention MDMA to him, although it ended up in the report.

“He also went on about stress, urging me to stop doing what I do, without any evidence that I have ever found it particularly stressful,” Spencer continued. “His intent seemed to be to get me to believe that I had not been drugged and should stop speaking out against jihad terror and Shariah oppression.”

Spencer also noted the doctor admitted Spencer was drugged but said it was not a “serious poisoning.”

“How much poison must one be given for the poisoning to be ‘serious’?” Spencer asked. “I had most of the symptoms of MDMA overdose. That’s serious enough for me.”

The Icelandic journalist Friðriksson confirmed police are reviewing Spencer’s complaint.

Spencer said a police official took immediate steps to obtain the restaurant’s surveillance video and identify the suspects.

Along with directing Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, Spencer is author of the New York Times bestsellers “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)” and “The Truth About Muhammad.” His latest book is “The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Iran.”

‘Firestorm of abuse’

Spencer said his visit had “triggered a firestorm of abuse in the Icelandic press, all based on American leftist talking points.”

The Icelandic press noted he was banned by the United Kingdom from entry in 2013, but didn’t mention it was for saying that Islam has doctrines of violence. He also was condemned for supporting Israel and falsely accused of inciting the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik to kill.

Spencer said in a report Monday it’s clear that “jihad and Islamization are not subjects that Icelandic politicians and media opinion-makers want Icelanders to discuss.”

The lesson learned from his trip to Iceland, he said, is “media demonization of those who dissent from the leftist line is direct incitement to violence.”

“By portraying me and others who raise legitimate questions about jihad terror and Shariah oppression as racist, bigoted Islamophobes, without allowing us a fair hearing, the media in Iceland and elsewhere in the West is actively endangering those who dare to dissent.”

Spencer has led seminars on Islam and jihad for the FBI, the United States Central Command, United States Army Command and General Staff College, the U.S. Army’s Asymmetric Warfare Group, the Joint Terrorism Task Force, the Justice Department’s Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council and the U.S. intelligence community.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Germany: Muslim migrant who “never demonstrated any signs of remorse” gets 11 years for raping two students

EU-sponsored propaganda video shows fairy godmother bringing migrants to Europe on flying carpet

Norming Evil: Enemedia keeps citing hate machine Southern Poverty Law Center

The SPLC, traffickers in blood libel and incitement to murder, is a hate group that the left counts on to smear, defame and destroy those brave enough to oppose their totalitarian agenda. This is the hardcore leftist group whose members have targeted family group leaders for assassination.

SPLC uses its hate group listings to demonize conservatives and anyone who dissents from its statist, authoritarian agenda. Its hate group list is so tendentious and politically motivated that they were recently removed from a government website’s listing of resources on hate groups. The SPLC lists my organizations and me as hate groups.

The ill-gotten wealth of the SPLC amounts to tens of millions of dollars, while those whom they target, the supporters of freedom, are meagerly financed by average Americans who want freedom preserved in this country.
But what is most egregious is that the enemedia regularly cites the SPLC as a legitimate “think tank” when writing about my colleagues and me.

DALE WILCOX: WHY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA MUST STOP CITING ‘ANTI-HATE’-CRUSADER SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER

By Dale Wilcox, Breitbart, May 15, 2017:

LAST WEEK, MY ORGANIZATION, AN IMMIGRATION-CONTROL ADVOCATE, PUBLICLY RELEASED A 2016 DISCIPLINARY OPINION FROM THE OBAMA-ERA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ) OFFICIALLY REPRIMANDING A SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER (SPLC) ATTORNEY FOR UNPROFESSIONAL AND FRIVOLOUS BEHAVIOR IN IMMIGRATION COURT PROCEEDINGS.

For decades, DOJ’s asked us to contribute briefs in difficult and complex immigration cases and in one such case the SPLC, a tax-exempt “anti-hate” organization, took it upon itself to file an unsolicited brief with the immigration court attacking us as “white supremacist,” “anti-Semitic,” and “anti-Catholic.” It was an odd bit of name-calling considering my small team happens to include Catholics, Jews, and non-whites.

Thankfully, even the Obama DOJ saw the move as a shameful and discreditable attack. DOJ’s disciplinary counsel fulsomely reprimanded the SPLC attorney, as well as attorneys from its partner-organizations, sending them a letter calling their attacks “frivolous behavior,” “derogatory name-calling,” and generally showing “a lack of professionalism.” DOJ also stated that the involved attorneys abused the briefing process and failed to aid the administration of justice.

DOJ’s reprimand actually builds on an existing trend for the SPLC. Over the last few years, the group’s “shoot-first, debate-never” approach has been skewered by a number of outlets, including Philanthropy RoundtableHarpersCounterpunchWeekly StandardHuffington Post, Reason, Washington Times, and Foreign Policy. The criticism seems to be correlated with the group’s ever-evolving and increasingly incoherent “hate-group” standard, a problematic feature inherent in the group’s business-model. Like the proverbial shark that has to keep swimming, the SPLC must keep fear-mongering and expanding its “hate-group” narrative lest its donors begin to stray. As JoAnn Wypijewski at The Nation once wrote, the SPLC knows “hate sells” and, hence, must continue telling donors that the Klan’s just around the corner.

But with the KKK now basically extinct, what’s a “hate-crusader” like the SPLC to do? Apart from opening up an attack on us (31 years after our founding), the SPLC has recently labelled opponents of Common Core as “far-right extremists,” they’ve attacked almost every GOP presidential candidate as either homophobic or racist this past election cycle, and they’ve even attacked The Hobbit for apparently reinforcing the “White Patriarchy.”

So inflammatory and irresponsible is the group’s “hate-watch” commentary, in 2012 they inspired an armed gay-rights activist to enter the Washington, D.C. headquarters of the Family Research Council (a pro-Christian “hate organization” according to the SPLC) in an attempt to, in his words, shoot and kill “as many people as possible.”

Why their “hate-expertise” can’t be taken seriously was reinforced recently when they reportedly snuck-in death statistics from Islam-inspired terrorist-attacks, including Florida’s Pulse Club, in a report that “proved” the US was undergoing a surge in “radical-right” terrorism.

But arbitrariness has apparently been the group’s maxim for some time. In 2007, they teamed up with the Hispanic lobbying group, La Raza, when the latter mounted a massive public relations-push in support of the Kennedy-McCain amnesty bill. As part of the initiative, the SPLC named and shamed as a “hate group” the bill’s biggest opponent, the decades-old Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR, our sister organization). La Raza, which means “The Race” in Spanish, is an explicitly race-centric organization that has close ties with and once gave an award to Jose Angel Gutierrez, a former leader of the ethno-nationalist Unida Raza party (‘United Race’) and who once declared, “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”

Then there’s the SPLC’s mercurial founder, Morris Dees. Despite his outward appearance as a fighter of “hate,” before starting the group, Dees reportedly worked for segregationists George Wallace and then-candidate for Alabama Attorney-General, McDonald Gallion. Elsewhere, he’s claimed that the Confederate flag is part of his southern heritage.

But, of course, guilt-by-association’s an easy game to play. No one knows this better than the SPLC. For years, the group’s tried to smear FAIR by publishing random quotes from an early founder, Dr. John Tanton; quotes which are not only presented out of context but date back as early as the mid-1970s—ancient history for many Americans and prior to FAIR’s founding. These attempts to tar the good name of a legitimate organization with a long public record that shows no sign of favoritism or discrimination are as infantile as they are shameful.

Whatever the SPLC’s intentions, one thing’s certain: Those in the media that still use them as a legitimate “hate-watch source” have to stop doing so. What the SPLC wants is to insert into American public life a kind of extreme moral surveillance; one which creates an atmosphere of soft oppression that says “become passive and be unmolested.” This is absolutely not something America values as a nation and my organization will never bow down to such bullying tactics.

Who really deserves smearing are fear-mongers like the SPLC; not immigration reform-advocates like ourselves. We embrace debate, not hate. The SPLC should do the same.

Dale Wilcox is the Executive Director & General Counsel for the Immigration Reform Law Institute (irli.org), a public interest law firm that advocates for immigration policies that serve the national interest.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on The Geller Report.

Senior Citizen Prosecuted for ‘Hate’ for saying on Facebook She Saw Migrants Defecating in Streets, Setting Cars Ablaze

These countries are enforcing Islamic law (sharia), punishing their own people under Islam’s brutal speech laws. As I am oft quoted, “truth is the new hate speech.”

muslims-torching-cars-400x267Swedish Pensioner Prosecuted for ‘Hate’ for Accusing Migrants of Torching Cars on Facebook

Breitbart, May 14, 2017:

A 70-YEAR-OLD SWEDISH WOMAN IN DALARNA IS BEING PROSECUTED FOR HATE SPEECH AFTER CLAIMING ON FACEBOOK SHE SAW MIGRANTS DEFECATING IN THE STREETS AND SETTING FIRE TO CARS.

According to the prosecution, the woman “expressed a disparaging view of refugees” on Facebook. She stands accused of having taken to the social media website in early July 2015 to make the “derogatory” post, alleging that migrants “set fire to cars, and urinate and defecate on the streets”.

Prosecutors in Sweden say the woman’s message violates the nation’s law on incitement to racial hatred (Hets mot folkgrupp, or HMF), a crime with carries a maximum penalty of four years.

Islam is not a race.

The accused admitted that she wrote the post but denied committing any criminal act. The evidence against her consists of a screenshot from Facebook, according to local media.

People took to Flashback, the net’s largest Swedish language forum, to criticise the state’s decision to prosecute the pensioner, with one poster lamenting the accused “has fallen into the clutches of the politically correct”.

A user with the screen name ‘Nospheratu’ pointed out that the original idea behind HMF was “to prevent large-scale propaganda by political parties” against demographic groups, with lawmakers “having 1930s Germany in mind” whilst passing laws. The user slammed the law for being used to “prosecute old ladies on the bus” criticising immigrants.

Another slammed Sweden for hypocrisy, accusing the nation’s media and politicians of condemning restrictions on freedom of speech and expression in other countries “while themselves engaging in the worst kinds of witch hunts of dissidents”.

Sweden’s Justice Minister Morgan Johansson cited freedom of speech when he rejected Gothenburg police chief Erik Nord’s suggestion that the country deports Islamic State-supporting migrants, after the Islamist terror attack in Stockholm last month.

“We have freedom of speech in Sweden. This means people have the right to hold repulsive opinions here,” said Johansson.
“But there are always limits… For example when it comes to hate speech,” added the minister, who called Nord’s policy suggestion “problematic”, and demanded the police chief “explain himself”.

EDITORS NOTE: The column originally appeared on The Geller Report.

Muslim teen girl beaten, shot in face by her father and brother in attempted honor killing

She dishonored her family – of course they had to beat and shoot her, right? The Islamic honor code – respect it, islamophobes!

TEENAGE GIRL FIGHTS FOR LIFE AFTER HER FATHER AND BROTHER SHOT HER IN THE FACE IN ATTEMPTED HONOUR KILLING BECAUSE SHE LOVED A MAN IN HER VILLAGE

  • Ruby, 18, had been in a secret relationship with Ibrahim, 24, for last three years
  • Sister overheard her talking to him on the phone and told her brother and father
  • Ruby’s brother, Iftikhar, 32, and father, Sameraj, 52, confronted her
  • They beat her before shooting her twice – once in her face and once in her chest

By Charnamrit Sachdeva In India For Mailonline, 12 May 2017:

A TEENAGE GIRL IS FIGHTING FOR HER LIFE AFTER HER FATHER AND BROTHER SHOT HER IN THE FACE AND CHEST IN AN ATTEMPTED HONOUR KILLING BECAUSE SHE LOVED A MAN IN HER VILLAGE.

Ruby, 18, from a small village in Sambhal, in Uttar Pradesh, northern India, had been in a secret relationship with Ibrahim, 24, for the last three years.

But yesterday her younger sister overheard her talking to him on the phone and told her brother and father.

Within minutes of finding out, Ruby’s brother, Iftikhar, 32, and father, Sameraj, 52, confronted her.

They brutally beat her before shooting her twice – once in her face and once in her chest.

Video footage showed Ruby being taken to hospital covered in blood with a bandage on her face

Ruby was attacked after her younger sister overheard her talking to the older man on the phone

Neighbours heard loud screams and called the police who rushed to the scene.

They arrived at approximately 4am this morning to find Ruby lying on the floor outside her home, bleeding to death as members of the family did nothing.

Police rushed her to a local government run hospital where her condition was reported as critical.

Due to a lack of facilities she was referred to a private hospital in Moradabad, around 40 kms away, early this morning.

Video footage showed Ruby being taken to hospital covered in blood with a bandage on her face.

Her brother and father were arrested at the scene.

Officer Brahmapal Singh Baliyan, from Asmoli Police Station, said: ‘It’s an honour killing case. The girl told us at the hospital that she was shot by her brother and father after they came to know about her relationship.

‘She also said that her mother was involved as she opposed a marriage between the girl and her boyfriend.

‘She is currently in a critical condition and is being treated at a private hospital with police protection.’

Dr Jitender Singh, Emergency Medical Officer at the District Hospital, said: ‘She arrived in a semi conscious state and was bleeding heavily. Her blood pressure was really low and she was barely able to speak.

‘She had one bullet in the left side of her face, around 3 cm away from ear, and one bullet on the right side of her chest. As we do not have proper surgeons or an ICU ward here, she was referred to a private hospital in Moradabad. She needs immediate treatment as she could die due to heavy bleeding.’

Both father and son are currently in police custody and have been arrested under Section 307 (Attempt to murder) of Indian Penal Code.

Police confirmed other members of the family will be interviewed once Ruby is in a stable state to give an official statement.

Video Player

 EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on The Geller Report.

Muslim Migrant ‘hurled a woman through a window because she refused to have sex with him’

This migrant not only threw a woman out of the woman because she refused him sex, he also is being investigated for harassing another woman and sexually assaulted a 17-year-old girl.

The kicker is the migrant said he was on remand for ‘no reason’ and that life had been unfair to him ever since he arrived in Germany in 2014.

Why was this savage not deported after his first sexual attack? Merkel is responsible for it all.

Dawit A.

Dawit A.

ASYLUM SEEKER IN GERMANY ‘HURLED A WOMAN THROUGH A WINDOW BECAUSE SHE REFUSED TO HAVE SEX WITH HIM’

  • Dawit A., 34, is accused of throwing 26-year-old woman Tirhas out of a window
  • Tirhas says Dawit was drinking when he threatened her with a broken bottle
  • Claims he told her to lie down and threw her 15ft on to concrete when she said
  • Dawit wept, saying life in Germany had been ‘unfair’ since he arrived in 2014

AN ASYLUM SEEKER IN GERMANY IS ACCUSED OF THROWING A WOMAN OUT OF A WINDOW AND BREAKING BOTH HER LEGS AFTER SHE REFUSED TO HAVE SEX WITH HIM.

Dawit A., 34, allegedly drank beer and vodka at a refugee centre in Bensheim before threatening a woman identified only as Tirhas, 26, with a broken bottle.

She claims he ordered her to lie down and asked if she had ‘another man’ before hurling her out of a window where she fell 15ft on to the concrete below.

On trial at Frankfurt State Court, prosecutors said Tirhas visited Dawit in his room in July last year with another couple.

Lawyers said the men drank while the women cooked and later made coffee.

But at some point during the gathering Dawit A. became violent, the prosecution allege, throwing the apartment keys out of the window.

The prosecution said he was furious because he wanted sex and she refused him.

Standing on crutches to give evidence, she told the court: ‘I shouted “Please let me out of here.” He demanded to know if I had another man.

‘He threatened me with a broken bottle, wanted to stab me in the belly. He wanted sex, said I should lie down.

Dawit claimed he is being held for ‘no reason’ and that life has been ‘unfair’ since he came to Germany in 2014. He previously sexually assaulted a 17-year-old girl

‘When I kept saying “no”, he raised me up like a child, carried me to the window and dropped me.’

She plunged nearly 15ft, breaking both legs and spent 16 days in hospital. She added: ‘He not only broke both my legs, but also my spirit.’

Dawit A. cried in the dock, claimed he was sitting in prison on remand for ‘no reason’ and that life had been unfair to him ever since he arrived in Germany in 2014.

But the court heard that is he also being investigated for harassing another woman and sexually assaulted a 17-year-old girl.

Dawit is facing up to five years behind bars for grievous bodily harm, threats, coercion, sexual coercion and deprivation of liberty if found guilty.

The trial will conclude next week.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.