“My 14-year old son was lynched by his Muslim friends”

India and Israel are on the front lines of the jihad war against the non-Muslim.

The young boy’s mother said his Muslim friends, who held him hostage, had lynched him.

MY SON WAS LYNCHED BY HIS MUSLIM FRIENDS: MOTHER OF 14-YEAR-OLD CRIES FOR JUSTICE

The 14-year-old’s mother says she received a ransom call for Rs 10,000 and was also made to hear her son, Yogesh’s frightened wails on phone.

Yogesh Kumar

By Priyanka Sharma | Posted by Ashna Kumar, New Delhi, July 16, 2017 |

A mysterious case of the murder of a 14-year-old boy has surfaced in the national Capital, with his mother alleging that he was held hostage and lynched by some Muslim friends.

The victim, identified as Yogesh Kumar, was found dead under mysterious circumstances near New Delhi Railway Station last month. Multiple injury marks were found all over his face and the body indicated that he was battered to death, doctors said. However, police remain tight-lipped over the cause of death considering it a communally sensitive matter.

Yogesh’s body was brought to the Lady Hardinge Medical College (LHMC) by police for the postmortem examination on June 23. Doctors who conducted autopsy said the injuries on his body were clear signs of his being attacked with a sharp object. Victim’s mother, Seema alleged it was case of lynching by his Muslim friends, who had demanded money from her while keeping Yogesh hostage. She even claimed that they made her hear Yogesh’s voice for once who was trembling with fear.

HIS MUSLIMS FRIENDS LYNCHED HIM

Recalling the horrifying incident to Mail Today, she said, “On June 23, Yogesh left home after he got a call from his friend Arif. He, along with other friends, including a girl Fatima, first kidnapped my son, later demanding Rs 10,000 from me. I was told that if money was not given on time, they will kill my son.” “The very next morning, I was told that my son was killed and thrown somewhere along the railway track near New Delhi station,” Seema said. Yogesh’s family lives in Shahadra’s Meet Nagar. Despite being very young, he had been working to fetch money for his mother’s treatment.

His mother works as a domestic help. Doctors, on the condition of anonymity told Mail Today, “The body was hit brutally and had severe injuries on face, skull and back. It seemed that deceased was beaten up repeatedly with some objects like stone or a bottle. We could smell a case of lynching.” An FIR was lodged in the case the next day which stated that the body was lying in a pool of blood. Broken pieces of glass bottles, a stone and few bricks were also reportedly found with traces of blood on it.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Muslim who made rape video of his wife told cops that everything he did was acceptable in Islam

A hadith depicts Muhammad saying: “If a husband calls his wife to his bed [i.e. to have sexual relation] and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning” (Bukhari 4.54.460).

Another hadith attributes this to Muhammad: “By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself [to him for sexual intercourse] she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel’s saddle” (Ibn Majah 1854).

Yet Inspector Paul Young of the Rape Investigation Team says: “This sentence sends out a message to people who think they are outside the law with behaviour which cannot be excused by any community or religion and we will, where we can, take forward a prosecution without a victim to protect that person and the wider community in which these people live.”

Has Inspector Paul Young of the Rape Investigation Team really studied Islam and discovered that this man’s actions “cannot be excused by any community or religion”? Or is he just indulging in wishful thinking? Hmmm, which could it be?

“Man who made horrendous “rape-video” of wife told police Islam consented,” Cumbria Crack, August 15, 2017:

A 35-year-old man has been jailed for ten years for a sexual assault after his victim, who is also his wife, refused to give evidence against him.

In what is believed to be one of the first cases of its kind Northumbria Police proceeded with a prosecution after mobile phone footage of the assault was found on the man’s phone….

The man was initially arrested after his wife reported to police that she had been raped at their home address and handed police her mobile phone.

The two minute video was described as disturbing and showed the victim, who had been largely naked and in a drug/alcohol induced state, being abused. The video showed the distressed victim crying and begging the man to stop.

Although initially co-operative with the police, within a couple of months the victim refused to go to court, saying she wanted her husband released from custody and giving a retraction statement.

The man said he needed to prove she drank alcohol and slept around and had made the video for divorce proceedings. The court heard that despite accusations of the woman having an affair he had no evidence to prove this and police secured a statement from an Imam to negate this saying he would not have required this evidence for a divorce.

On a number of occasions the man gave differing accounts in court saying the couple often videoed each other and Islam consented to everything that was on the video….

Inspector Paul Young of the Rape Investigation Team, said: “Throughout this case this man showed little regard for women and thought he could do what he wanted to his wife.

“This sentence sends out a message to people who think they are outside the law with behaviour which cannot be excused by any community or religion and we will, where we can, take forward a prosecution without a victim to protect that person and the wider community in which these people live.”

RELATED ARTICLES:

Hamas-linked CAIR calls for destruction of every Confederate memorial

India: Muslims riot after Friday prayers, attack police and Hindu temple, many policemen injured

No death penalty for Florida Muslim who killed 2 men for disrespecting his conversion to Islam

No explanation for this was offered. Would seeking the death penalty in this case be “Islamophobic”?

Devon Arthurs

“Prosecutors will not seek death in Tampa neo-Nazi slaying,” Associated Press, August 10, 2017:

Prosecutors said they will not seek the death penalty against a former neo-Nazi accused of killing two of his roommates.

The decision was announced without explanation during a hearing on Thursday in the case of 18-year-old Devon Arthurs, who faces two counts of first-degree murder, The Tampa Bay Times reported.

Arthurs took people hostage in a Tampa-area smoke shop in May, then led police to the bodies of his two roommates in an apartment they shared.

He told police he killed Jeremy Himmelman, 22, and Andrew Oneschuk, 18, because they had disrespected his recent conversion to Islam.

Arthurs later told detectives the men were members of a neo-Nazi group called Atomwaffen Division who were planning bombings….

RELATED ARTICLES:

New York: Muslim arrested with large weapons cache destined for terror-linked Islamic compound

India: Muslim boys kidnap and murder their 14-year-old Hindu friend

Video: Robert Spencer on the Islamic and Leftist war against the freedom of speech

Muslim snipers open fire on non-Muslims from mosque rooftop

“Gunmen perched on mosque open fire as Marawi burns,” by Ron Gagalac, ABS-CBN News, August 10, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

MANILA – Terrorist snipers were captured on camera firing at state troops from atop a mosque in Marawi City Thursday, boosting reports that the extremists have been using the place of worship as camp.

ABS-CBN footage showed snipers from the Maute group perched on the mosque and opening fire on soldiers as plumes of dark smoke billowed in the background.

Gunshots can be heard clattering as security forces fired back.

Thousands of state troops have been battling Islamic State-linked terrorists Marawi since May 23. They have confined the crisis to less than a square kilometer within the lakeside town.

The fighting however intensified anew on Wednesday night as soldiers engaged the rebels in close quarter battle.

ABS-CBN night vision cameras captured the exchange of gunfire that lasted up to the late hours, during which fires broke out and thick smoke engulfed the city.

Military tanks were also seen moving around the old capitol under enemy fire.

As of Wednesday, the battle for Marawi has killed some 700 people, including 539 terrorists and 122 state troops….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Hamas-linked CAIR defends McMaster, says “Islamophobes” behind effort to remove him

Indonesia: Chinese deity is covered in sheet after Muslims protest

Muslim arrested in ‘deliberate’ Paris car ramming of soldiers

Hamou is a name found in Algeria among Berbers. It is derived from the name Muhammad. And so yet again we have a case of vehicular jihad, as I detailed earlier, although French authorities are no doubt still searching for a motive.

“Car rams into soldiers in Paris suburb, suspect arrested after manhunt,” by Richard Lough and Benoit Tessier, Reuters, August 9, 2017:

PARIS (Reuters) – French police shot and arrested a man on Wednesday suspected of deliberately ramming his car into a group of soldiers in a Parisian suburb hours earlier, injuring six of them in what the government called a deliberate attack.

Armed police from elite units tracked the fugitive for five hours after the attack before cornering him on a motorway in northern France and shooting him several times.

The suspect was unarmed when he was trapped by police some 260 km (162 miles) north of Paris where he had attacked the soldiers in the affluent suburb of Levallois-Perret, a judicial source said. There was no immediate word on his condition.

The man appeared to have lain in wait for the soldiers in a pedestrian zone near their base in Levallois-Perret on the northwestern edge of the capital where France’s domestic counter-terrorism agency is based.

He accelerated his BMW car into the troops, who were starting their patrol, when they were a few meters away, Interior Minister Gerard Collomb said, before speeding off and sparking a huge manhunt.

Hamou B

“This was a deliberate act, not an accident,” Collomb told reporters outside the hospital where the three more seriously injured victims were being treated.

He said a terrorism investigation had been launched.

The soldiers were part of Operation Sentinel, launched in the wake of Islamist attacks in Paris in early 2015. The Levallois-Perret attack was the 15th on troops and police in the last two-and-a-half years, many of them Islamic State-inspired.

Prime Minister Edouard Philippe told lawmakers in parliament that the assailant had been detained. One policeman was injured by a stray bullet in the operation.

The daily newspaper Le Parisien named the suspect as 37-year-old Hamou B., originally from Satrouville west of Paris and said that searches had been carried out at his home and those of his associates. The Paris prosecutor’s office declined to comment….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Indonesian suicide bomb plotter: “The blessing from jihad could help my parents enter heaven”

Snopes says claim NJ town forbade criticism of Islam “false,” then quotes: “No commentary regarding Islam permitted”

Muslim group blames women for rape for exposing their ‘Allah-given delicacies’

“An Islamic Group Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has blamed the increase in reported rape cases on women dressing indecently.” Ishaq Akintola, president of Muslim Rights Concern in Lagos, stated: “The way you dress is the way you will be addressed. You cannot send out a letter without receiving a reply.” Akintola added:

Why do they pose half-nude in adverts, magazine covers, etc? Why are women so willing to expose their Allah-given ‘delicacies’ to naked eye.

If a woman chooses to expose her “Allah-given delicacies” by way of her dress, it is her human right to do so, but herein lies the problem. According to Islamic jurisprudence, women are not equals to men. They are possessions of men and are commanded to cover themselves from head to toe to protect men from out-of-control desires:

(Quran 24:31) And tell the believing women to reduce of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which appears thereof and to wrap their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.

If a woman does not cover, she is fair game to be assaulted….

(Quran 33:59) O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.

Men should be able to control themselves at the sight of a scantily-clad woman, but when they are instructed under Islamic rules, they blame women for their own victimization. The invocation of Islamic texts as an excuse for attacking women is now a global problem; we see expanding evidence of it across Europe, where women and girls are getting assaulted and raped by Muslim migrants. The same phenomenon manifests itself in the “Muslim grooming gangs” in the UK.

Still, all too many leaders in the West are more concerned about offending Muslims than about protecting innocent women from barbaric doctrines. They adamantly refuse to identify and call out the real problem of the clash of civilizations and what President Trump has called “radical Islamic terrorism.”

“Increase in rape a result of indecent dressing – MURIC”,

BellaNaija, (Thanks to The Religion of Peace), August 6, 2017:

An Islamic Group Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has blamed the increase in reported rape cases on women dressing indecently.

According to Punch, it was said in a statement released by the group in response to a protest on rape staged by another group War Against Rape (WAR).

Members of WAR had staged the protest at the office of the Lagos State Governor Akinwumi Ambode, decrying the increase in rape cases in the state.

Ishaq Akintola, president of MURIC said in the statement that the protest was a waste of time.

He called on WAR to launch a campaign against indecent dressing, and asked women to stop exposing their “Allah-given ‘delicacies.’”

Read the statement below:

Rape is on the increase mainly because moral bankruptcy has hit its peak. Women are no longer ashamed of exposing their bodies in public.

Even dresses which do not expose their bodies are sewn so tight that no one is left in doubt about the objective. It is the age of dress-to-kill. But women forget that many of them will fall victim of stray bullets.

Indecent dressing is a provocation and this is the issue which decent societies must address. MURIC invites WAR to launch a campaign against indecent dressing. The way you dress is the way you will be addressed. You cannot send out a letter without receiving a reply.

WAR should tell women to elevate their self-dignity. Why do they pose half-nude in adverts, magazine covers, etc? Why are women so willing to expose their Allah-given ‘delicacies’ to naked eye…..

Women should be told in clear and unequivocal terms that indecent dressing constitutes sexual harassment.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Robert Spencer in PJ Media: The California ‘Annihilate Jews’ Imam Was Simply Quoting Muhammad

UK: Christian festival to feature Islamic worship chants

Muslims Attack Counter Jihad Coalition, Law Enforcement Caves by Steve Amundson

At first I thought that the two Muslims shouting at us would leave, as they have done in the past. I was wrong; it played out differently on Saturday. They were there to stay with their loud, obnoxious voices until they could get us shut down. The crowd started growing due to the commotion. Soon it numbered in the hundreds.

The cause of all of this was that the Counter Jihad Coalition (CJC) was out on a public outreach in the Cerritos Mall in Cerritos, California, educating the public on the truth of Islam. The CJC was formed several years ago to get the truth into the hands of people, since most of the mainstream media paints Islam as the religion of peace.

We have developed over 30 brochures on different aspects of Islam. All are factual and true, not our opinions. They are all based on the doctrines of Islam as set out in the Quran and the Sunnah. On a typical day, we pass out 1,500 or more of these brochures to people, who for the most part are thankful for what we are doing.

We saw an increase in Muslim pushback right after the Islamic State (ISIS) made the news, and then a huge increase in their aggressiveness after President Trump was elected. They will go to great lengths to keep the people from knowing the violence, oppression and brutality that are inherent in what they believe. And now more than ever, they are on the warpath to shut down these truths.

This past Saturday, at this venue where we have been going to for a year, Muslim anger came to a head. I called security when things started to get unruly. Soon officers from mall security, along with several Los Angeles County Sheriff Deputies, arrived to try and restore calm and sort things out.

To show you how upside down our society is, the mall manager said to me that he was going to have to shut us down early. What? Everything had been going along smoothly until the two Muslims started yelling, shouting at us and creating the hostile environment. They knew if they disturbed and disrupted, that they would win. They shouted at me that they would be there every day looking for us, and would do whatever they had to do to shut us down.

It was only a few weeks ago that the Sharia police on Facebook banned our Counter Jihad Coalition Facebook site, and took it down. To this day, I have not received an explanation from them for their action. Facebook is simply Sharia-compliant. Not only us, but many other counter-jihad groups have recently been shut down on Facebook. Our freedoms are slowly being taken away from us by the leftists who are in control of the means of communication.

In a similar vein, do you think the Sheriff Deputies escorted the obnoxious, hateful, foul-mouthed Muslims out of the mall? Not a chance! When I asked one of the Deputies if they were going to escort out the unruly Muslims, their response to me was they were waiting to hear from the mall management and what they wanted to do. So much for our law enforcement officials protecting law-abiding citizens. Every time we want to have a public outreach at this mall, we turn in an application and wait until it is approved.

After the Deputies failed to escort out the Muslims who were causing the disruption, the mall manager came over to me and said, “We are going to have to shut you down early today.” When I suggested they usher out the unruly Muslims instead, I was told that they have a right to be there and said they would not leave until we left. Did we not have a right to be there? Our dhimmi law enforcement, mall security and mall management seem to be willing to cater to Muslims anytime they are called upon to do so.

We will see what happens next week, when I turn in a new application to exercise my right of free speech. Americans better wake up fast and start pushing back on this encroachment of Sharia before our freedoms and rights are gone. Then it will be too late.

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

YouTube left up bloody jihad videos for over a year

Germany: Muslim migrant soldier dismissed, supports Hamas, said “F**k the Jews”

The Truth About France’s Muslim No-Go Zones

Dateline, France, 2015-2017: Would you like to see what a Muslim-inhabited No-Go Zone in a European country such as France is like? To find out more, please follow the article below, translated from French, which you shall not find either referenced or translated in almost any news outlet in the English-speaking world’s media (because of a conspiratorial arrangement between the European-American Left and the Muslim Brotherhood to respectfully manage news and cooperate at a distance, because their diumvirate of convenience opposes the same enemy – namely – the patriotic forces of the so-called “Right” in the West). Although there is no reference to the Islamic influence in the content of the article, Islam is present because of its inability to make the Muslims behave like civilized people or feel a meaning in their lives. The urban decay is such in parts of France that even in a nearly all-Muslim city like Roubaix, Islam plays an inferior role because the young residents are such anarchists that they do not care even about their heritage or Islamic propaganda. However, in these conditions, some individuals can be drastically turned to Islamic radicalism, as had happened to the shooter of the Jewish Museum in 2014.

First of all, consider the view into these ghettos of North African immigrants (the fruits of France’s defeat in the Algerian War) which were formed in the wake of Algerian victory over France and her European colonists in North Africa. In a way, the Algerian immigration to France is a march of victors into the land of the defeated, a once proud European nation that was four times militarily defeated in the same 20th century (WW1, WW2, Vietnam War (Phase 1), Algerian War)! France allowed mass immigration of Muslims after her last military defeat following years of struggle against Arab nationalism and Islamism. During the 1970s, France simultaneously faced an economic crisis and allowed immigrants (mostly from the Muslim World) to permanently settle in France with their families and to acquire French citizenship. It resulted in hundreds of thousands of Algerian and Moroccan Muslims, moving especially to the larger cities, to live in subsidized public housing and to suffer from very high unemployment rates (supported by the government dole). France also imported immigrants from other European nations, but her problem areas remain and are filled with populations of non-European heritage only. What is it that keeps these non-Europeans so resentful of the French culture, feeling so hopeless, so destitute about their future? Answer: twofold: 1) the spiritually dead conditions in France where the natives do not instill respect into the immigrants, and 2) Islam and its exclusiveness. The larger problem is that the ideas of Islam are incompatible with the ideals of France’s history. The key thing is this: European history in general, and France’s historical traditions, in particular, are completely unattractive and unworthy of emulation in the muddy eye of the non-European crowd. They seek an alternative and often don’t find it, resulting either in endemic helter-skelter urban crime or in Islamic terrorism.

France’s Muslims like to say: “When a Christian goes mad and kills someone they call him ”mentally ill” but when a Muslim kills they call him ”a terrorist”. Moreover, these Arab Muslims also like to opine all day long while sitting around and turning their beads, smoking in the shade outside all day and moaning about their perceived victimization at the hands of the West, the French and “Christians” in general. In a true Manichaean fashion, the Oriental dualism of these Muslims comes out when they also blather to each other, while reclining on their outdoor sofas: “What are they talking about? Muslim terrorists? The Crusaders killed everybody. Everybody! It is them!” Apparently, all this is perfectly in line with the chunky welfare check they collect from the “evil” French government every month, probably seeing it as a poor payback for past wrongs done to Muslims.

Take the city of Roubaix, France. This city is not just a Muslim suburb, but an entire French city turning into an Islamic enclave, France’s first all-Muslim city! It would appear that France’s authorities have no power to engineer the French society in a way that would serve France’s long-term interest. But there are attempts to raise the alarm. For instance, there are groups in France seeking to campaign for the restoration of the French rule of law (or at least, to help bring back the habits of France to the Muslim ghettos in France’s cities), such as “La Brigade des Meres” [a mother’s brigade], which is aiming to restore gender equality in France’s troubled “banlieues” because women in many of France’s foreign communities are now too scared to go out where gangs of young men rule the streets. And a shocking undercover report, compiled by the TV channel France 2, shows how women are not welcome in bars and cafes in Muslim majority areas, with many men openly hostile to their presence in public at all. Pascale Boistard, the women’s rights minister in the French government of Hollande, declared: “There are now areas in our country where women can no longer go.” To cement proof of what is going on, two brave women from La Brigade des Meres wore button-hole cameras and headed alone into the Muslim majority Paris suburb of Sevran, which was at the center of the French capital’s 2005 race riots. They were stopped and not allowed to walk around or enter bars. The French government has no clue about what to do. The French government’s decision to bring in Muslim imams to quell the religious tensions which led to the 2005 riots had led to a more hardline version of Islam taking hold in France’s Muslim suburbs. In Lyon, France’s second biggest city, there is evidence that women are now actively altering their dress to avoid being threatened or abused by Muslim men. And an official in the patriotic party of France, the National Front, Ms Marechal-Le Pen, said downplayed evidence exists that some parts of the country are “no longer the land of France because Islamic law has taken hold”. She said: “It is no longer the law of France that applies, it is not the law of the Republic, we are witnessing the establishment of mini Caliphates where it’s Islamic law, Sharia, that applies every day.”

The reports by this and other concerned citizen groups of France revealed a definite existence of No-Go Zones For Women in France. And there are areas where the French police stay away from making normal patrols the way they do it in areas of France where as far as outward style and manner of etiquette there is a definite European presence.

ROUBAIX, “IT IS NOT CHICAGO”, BUT IT IS THE DEN OF POVERTY NONETHELESS

At the beginning of August, a father of a family was killed in the neighborhood of the Alma, in Roubaix, for a history of noise-making. In the working-class districts of the poorest town in France, inhabitants tell of their distress. Two weeks ago, 27-year-old Ahmed Boudaoud was killed in his staircase while asking two youngsters to stop making noise. It was 3:45 in the morning, he was splashed with shit and alcohol and one of them stabbed him in the throat.

When we speak of this tragedy to the Roubaisians, they say almost all the same thing. It is sad, but in many ways predictable if we put this fact into the local context: misery, despair, abandonment, when young people adrift in the neighborhood of the Alma, the place of the above drama, the inhabitants can not even rely on the police: there is little chance for it to move around. “As a result, there are parts of the city where you could ride with an assault tank without anyone telling you anything,” smiled Nadir (the first name was changed), a strong man of about forty he repeats the same thing often said.

“We are so used to being left to ourselves that we do not know what is normal or not here. It’s not Chicago, but you do have to cover your face, it’s very complicated. ”

Roubaix, 94,000 inhabitants, is the poorest city in France . More than 30% of the unemployed, 75% of the territory in the Sensitive Urban Area (ZUS) and, above all, its rotten reputation, a place where nothing has changed since the textile industry collapsed decades ago.

It is also the perfect illustration that in terms of insecurity, it is the poorest populations that have the most to lose.

They wanted to spend “a normal evening”

A blue-eyed boy who squats in front of a hall shows me 96 Rue d’Archimede, a small red-brick building in which the victim lived. He reflects: “What took him to go talk to drunkards, too?” ”

On the night of August 2 to 3, two young people – aged 19 and 21 – steal a car and start a car rodeo, fast and furious auto race in the Alma district. Accelerations, zigzags, skids. After that, they decide to burn a poor building because out of the window of the building, a man named Ahmed tells them that the race prevents his three children from sleeping.

They poke out of the car, knock on all the doors of the building – whose gate is open to all – to find him and once they succeed, after a few words exchanged, stick a blade in his throat – according to the testimony of his wife, Jennifer. Ahmed will die in the ambulance. Very quickly, two suspects are arrested by the police, to whom they explain that they simply wanted to pass “a normal evening” . One of the two gave himself up at the police station, whose family reasoned him into doing so, and he himself said that he was persuaded by … the father of the deceased. For Roubaix, it is a large village, where everyone knows everyone, more or less. Since then, the two guys, held in pre-trial detention, are blaming themselves for the facts. To our brothers from Paris, a  man named Amar, the uncle of the deceased, explains: “The murder of my nephew shows one thing: when one lives in these quarters, one has only two alternatives, to be a rogue or to be subject to their gang law. The situation is worse and worse. Then we let the people here kill each other, and then we pick up the corpses. ” “The land no longer belongs to the police” Since 2012, seven districts of the city have been classified as a Priority Security Zone (ZSP). No regular police officers patrol these areas, but for the authorities there is some good news in that they had a few good results in dismantling large criminal trafficking groups of Arab Muslims of North African heritage.

Nadir: “Okay for big networks, but while they work on large fish, the little ones make a living at the expense of the inhabitants. ” Nadir’s brother, who briefly cuts off the conversation: “The land no longer belongs to the police. The police left it to the young people. Today, it is completely outdated. […] On the one hand, when a cop who is paid only 1,500 euros knows this, why would he stick his head into danger?”

Sarah, 21, a law student, lives in the Manlet district, recounts: “I’ve seen two boys fighting here and the police passing by as if nothing had happened. They surely told themselves that they were two Arabs and that it did not matter. But what image does it give in the end? ” During the municipal campaign, Pierre Dubois, the outgoing mayor, had assured that in Roubaix, there was only “a feeling of insecurity”. A gaffe, more than a denial, that made a lot of people laugh. In the neighborhood of Le Pile , riparians [a few owners of land on the bank of a natural watercourse] talked about creating a militia – a type of citizen patrol – to restore calm. A desperate idea, which opens the way to even more violence. Paranoia and revenge too, all this between neighbors. Marc Vasseur, the assistant director of the mayor’s office (UMP), has no problem recognizing the existence of no-rights/no-go zones. “In twenty years, Roubaix has lost 300 police officers”: “Some residents resigned themselves to no longer calling the police because the police no longer move. They are at the end of the roll. Some only ask for one thing: to sleep at night.” To tell the truth, it is not the new municipal team that will deny that it is about the poverty. After having ravished the town hall in the election going over to the Left last spring, the strategy could roughly be summarized to this: “We have inherited a big galley, we will not get rabbits out of the hat, especially not in four months. ” It is a good war, and in the end, not inaccurate to say, as all the witnesses we interviewed admit. Moreover, the tasks do not even overwhelm the outgoing team. What we hear here and there is rather: “A town hall can not do everything, it is the state that has to look at the poorest city in France. ”

Roubaix is ​​the city where kids, more than anywhere else, have never seen their parents work. Where one inherits the state welfare system – “RSA” – (ex-RMI) – and the worries that go with, where one leaves the school very early to go to hang out. Where people are so fed up that they call them poor and still laughing they say “eh, but you know that among us there are some who pay the tax on wealth? ” “This void creates hatred” Julie, a pretty forty-year-old who prefers to remain anonymous, who lived “two years at the Alma” in the 80’s, when life was cool, says: “I have a girlfriend. One day she asked a student what he wanted to do later. He replied “like daddy, be unemployed”. ” And continues: “Beyond the responsibilities of everyone, I believe that reputation does not help either. By dint of repeating to them that they live in the worst city of France, the young people say that they will not succeed. That there is no chance of finding a job, because there are no more. So they get bogged down. ”

Roubaix is ​​the corner where thousands of Maghreb people – mainly from Algeria – have been piled up in disadvantaged areas that continue to sink into the galley. In a small cafe, Tawfik, 32, who has worked in the professional insertion, talks a little about the “void”, the feeling many Roubaisians of Maghrebian origin have. He explains that they feel forgotten and discriminated against in France – “because of their facies, their religion and their economic condition” – but also know that they are not at home here: “Some people do not know who they are. So they look for their identity without finding it for the moment. And this void creates hatred. ” “It has become a trash can”, a moral cesspool.

The gangs of Roubaix, poverty and more recently Mehdi Nemmouche [the fanatical 2014 Jewish Museum of Belgium shooter who was from here], is enough to sully a reputation. In recent years, local politicians have done everything they can to improve the image of the city, even if it means removing from Wikipedia information deemed too pejorative for Roubaix. Urban renovations, historical districts, cultural dynamism, the Paris-Roubaix partnership or a promise of a more active population – one would almost forget the problems: in fact, everything is not so black in the former textile capital of the world. This neighboring Croix with 20,483 inhabitants, is in another world: in the ranking of cities where the average amount of income is the highest, the commune comes just after Neuilly-sur-Seine and Cayenne. But many inhabitants of the working-class districts do not give up on their condition. With so much insecurity and unemployment, it is hard to be optimistic.

Nadir insists that the local employers do everything not to recruit the Roubaisians, starting with the town hall, which does not set an example. “With an Arabian surname, it is almost unacceptable, it must be known. […] For some positions of educators, the city hall recruits outside the city. We inherit the most rotten posts. We are not asking for engineer jobs either, and not everybody wants a deal. ” The town hall refutes the territorial discrimination softly, while admitting the distress of the working-class districts. “In some areas, there are more than 30% of the unemployed. ”

A meeting bar in front of a drug dealing hotspot

Nadir laughs in front of a snack. “1.50 panini is the cheapest bread in France. Just before, a restaurateur of the city told me that the situation was getting worse:

“More and more, people come and tell me that for a sandwich for three euros, they lose 50 cents or 1 euro. It’s very difficult. Here, you have married couples who for lack money, live with their parents. After a while, when you are given up to yourself, some say you have to go get the money where it is. ”

Honestly, kind of odd jobs at black or small services here and there, or illegally, stealing or drug dealing. The points of drug deals in the city are known.

Vendors – some of them minors – do not really hide. The street is theirs. In one of them, a bar was fixed to the wall to make a drug kiosk. The vendor says:

“If they removed all the crap from Roubaix, which for many is an income that will ensure a little comfort, it will cause an explosion of burglaries and other aggressions of any kind. It will be a civil war itself. For me, this situation is a bit of a convenience for everyone. ”

In the street, we see some bad habits. More constraints, more rules, more limits. “At 15 years old, they have man’s concerns and already make the law at home,” says Nadir.

“Before, there was respect for the elders. There, there is nothing left. ”

Ahmed was a hero, too

Ahmed Boudaoud was a discrete, quiet type who did not make waves and who did not know that the confusion remains at the level of the words used as is often the case in the troubled districts when there are clashes are between “young squatters vs. neighbors”.

He was a hero too. Some time ago, he had saved a kid from drowning. The little blue-eyed young man who brought me up to 96 rue d’Archimede told me a little about him. 17 years old, no school – “too many confusions” – and perhaps a job of a handler thanks to a contact from his family. He asks me not to be too affirmative in my article:

“There is a rumor that the deceased was out with a knife and that one of the two guys currently in custody could have taken two stab wounds. ”

Unable to check this version of the facts yet. Reached by telephone, the deputy prosecutor of the Lille prosecutors office refuses to comment – and repeats what he said since the beginning of the case: a murder with knives, a mortal knife stab and two suspects known especially for possession of narcotics and other degradations.

“Guys like Ahmed who do not create so much mess were on the verge of getting screwed out of a deal at Alma” tells me a young person in a restaurant who knows the Boudaoud family and obviously suspects this: “Ahmed had no knife, it’s bullshit what they say about that. On the other hand, it is said that one of the two killers always had a blade on him because he had a seriously embarrassing feud with guys from Lille. ”

“We may have sacrificed a generation”

For Nadir, one should not over-interpret the fact:

“We talked about his slaughter, when it is not about that. This word refers to many more negative things. I believe there was no hatred in this act, even if it is shocking to everyone. They were drunk with alcohol; otherwise, perhaps nothing would have happened. ”

It’s true that Roubaix is ​​not Chicago. When one goes there, even at night, one thinks that it is not worse than another city whose districts are classified in ZSP……

Read the original article.

Muslim street toughs

Muslim street toughs in France.

RELATED ARTICLE: No Go Zones: New Book on Islamic Ghettos in Western World

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Rapes Soared 196% Since Liberal Danish Party Took Power, Invited Refugees

Since the self-proclaimed Conservative party Venstre (meaning “Left”) with their slogan “Denmark’s Liberal party” took power in June 2015, the number of rapes reported to the police has soared by a shocking 196 percent, according to the Danish state’s bureau of statistics.

This rise in rape attacks coincides with the liberal government’s opening of Danish national borders to refugees that primarily are from Islamic countries.

Also read: Sweden’s Islamic Rape Epidemic: Almost Half of Victims are CHILDREN

In Denmark, there are no official statistics on the rapists’ ethnicity or nationalities, but according to a report from the Danish Ministry of Justice, “There is a clear overrepresentation of immigrants from non-western countries when looking at the statistics of convicted rapists.”

Full story at 10news.one

RELATED ARTICLES:

“Palestinian” Muslim Who Slaughtered Israeli Family to Receive $3,120 Per Month Reward From Palestinian Authority

UK: Muslim rape gang leader to be freed from prison 17 years early

“We kill them because Allah told us to, and not because they attack us”

“The whole idea that this is merely a political war, is wrong. We kill them, because Allah told us to, and not because they attack us. The only way out for them is to convert or to pay a head tax.”

That’s in complete accord with the Qur’an and Islamic law:

“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).

A hadith depicts Muhammad saying:

“Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war…When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them…. If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them. (Sahih Muslim 4294)

In response, of course, mainstream analysts will say, No, ISIS is twisting and hijacking Islam, and this is a political war. Some people are impervious to evidence.

“This is how ISIS pushed me to make a video claiming responsibility,”

by Björn Stritzel, Bild, July 26, 2017:

How does ISIS recruit its attackers in Germany? What are the last instructions before the terrorists strike and kill as many innocent people as possible?

For months, BILD reporter Björn Stritzel pretended to be an Islamist willing to carry out an attack (always in consultation with the security authorities).

Abu K. is my guide at ISIS. He wants to assist me in the lead-up to my attack – my death. But we are not there yet. First, we deal with my video that is intended to be published online shortly after the attack. My business card of death. It is also the cynical, inhuman point of the attack, as I now realize.

Abu K. is very keen on my affirmation of ISIS. He keeps explaining to me what kind of text I am supposed to read out in the martyr’s video.

“Don’t say: ‘I’m doing this because you attack us’ or ‘If you stop, we will also stop’. More vigour is better,” Abu K. writes to me and formulates: “I am doing this, because the caliph has instructed me to attack the crusaders and their citizens.”

Abu K. unambiguously states what ISIS is about: “The whole idea that this is merely a political war, is wrong. We kill them, because Allah told us to, and not because they attack us. The only way out for them is to convert or to pay a head tax.” The guidelines provided by Abu K. correspond with the martyr’s videos by the Würzburg and Ansbach attackers (both in July, 2016). For ISIS, it is primarily the recognition value of the messages that counts. Everybody is supposed to immediately understand who has attacked here, independently of the individual attacker.”…

RELATED ARTICLES:

UK Bedfordshire Police: “Do you think you could spot the signs of right wing extremism?”

UK: Muslim rape gang leader to be freed from prison 17 years early