VIDEO: What Linda Sarsour won’t tell you about Islamic [Sharia] Law

Last week, while getting my part in David Wood’s “Islamicize Me” project on video, I took a break to film some segments for Jon McCray’s “Whaddo You Meme??” YouTube show. Here is one on Sharia.

RELATED ARTICLE: Video: The Nigerian Persecution (of Christians, by Muslims) No One Is Talking About

EDITORS NOTE: This video originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

VIDEO: Hamas Pays Muslims to Get Shot by IDF

This new edition of The Jamie Glazov Moment features Jamie discussing Hamas Pays Muslims to Get Shot by IDFwhere he offers yet another harrowing glimpse into a cult of death.

Don’t miss it!

Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov

EDITORS NOTE: Please donate through our Pay Pal account to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Thank you!

Jizya, ‘Military Exemption,’ and Murdered Christian Soldiers by Raymond Ibrahim

John Esposito

One of the staples of the Islamic whitewashing industry is the claim that jizya — the extortion money subjugated Jews and Christians were required to pay (a la Koran 9:29) — actually “entitled them to Muslim protection from outside aggression and exempted them from military service,” to quote Georgetown University’s John Esposito.

By this widely held logic, Muslim invaders did not demand that the conquered infidel populations ransom their lives with money — as virtually all Muslim jurists explain it — but rather were kind enough to offer their non-Muslim subjects “protection” and exemption from military service for a small fee.

The irony, of course, is that this claim continues to be contradicted by the deeds of Muslims in the modern era. Most recently, on March 14, Matthew Samir Habib, a 22-year-old Coptic Christian in Egypt’s military was killed by his Muslim counterparts — simply for being Christian. He is merely the latest of about nine Christian soldiers to be killed in recent months and years by Muslim soldiers on account of their faith.

And in virtually every case, a similar pattern follows: despite all the evidence otherwise (such as physical bruises all over the bodies of the slain), military officials insist that — due to some sudden and inexplicable bout of depression — all these Christians supposedly committed “suicide”; meanwhile, the dead Christian soldiers’ families and those closest to them insist their slain sons and brothers were happy and healthy, that they were observant Christians, and that there was evidence that they were being persecuted by their Muslim “brothers-in-arms” for their evident Christianity.

For example, in this latest case from March 14, the murdered Copt was shot twice — and still authorities maintain it was suicide. (Click here for several more examples of military authorities offering strange reasons for the deaths, and Christian families rejecting them.)

Why these Christians were killed is not difficult to comprehend. For many Muslims in Egypt and elsewhere, war is synonymous with jihad — and it doesn’t do much for morale to have lowly infidels fighting alongside would-be jihadis.

From here we understand why Christians and Jews were truly “exempt” from military service: not because they paid jizya-tribute, but because, as conquered infidels, they themselves were the enemy and had to remain separate and subjugated — as Egypt’s Copts remain to this day. (As one example, their requests to open or renovate churches are always met with mass violence and upheavals, often enabled if not instigated by local Muslim authorities: as infidels, Christians are not allowed to build or renovate temples of worship that openly challenge the teachings of Muhammad.)

Apologists such as Esposito twist the facts around in another important way: while payment of jizya did indeed purchase “protection” (of a sort) for the conquered infidels, that protection was never against an outside hostile force, but against inside hostile forces — that is, Muslims themselves: sharia manuals make clear that failure to pay jizya made the lives of dhimmis forfeit.

Finally, that the Koran itself requires conquered non-Muslims “to give the jizya willingly while they are humbled” (9:29), puts to rest any claim that payment of jizya was a mere business transaction but rather a ritual show of Islamic dominance over — and contempt for — infidels.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

Horrific photo: Gaza’s Grenade Baby

The left’s idea of “peace partners.” And the intended targets are the “villains.”

Photo thanks to Mark via Tsahi Hagag.

RELATED ARTICLE: Israel Versus Hamas: The Case for Moral Clarity

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story – and it’s every story – it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

Former Obama State Department official who is a Muslim likens opposition to jihad terror to bigotry against Jews, blacks, Chinese

Wa’el N. Alzayat is CEO of EmergeUSA

In its lengthy hit piece on Mike Pompeo and John Bolton, which I discussed at length here, the New York Times says this about Secretary of State-designate Mike Pompeo’s opposition to jihad terror and Sharia oppression:

Wa’el N. Alzayat, who was a Middle East expert at the State Department and senior policy adviser to Samantha Power, the former United Nations ambassador, said of Mr. Pompeo’s comments, “Imagine if this stuff had been said about Jews, or African-Americans or Chinese-Americans. And yet, we’re living with an administration that is actually rewarding people with racist views or racist associations with some of the highest positions in our government.”

Right, Wa’el. “Imagine if this stuff had been said about Jews, or African-Americans or Chinese-Americans.” Yeah, and imagine if the stuff that was said about Charles Manson had been said about your Aunt Rose. Wa’el N. Alzayat is relying on people’s ignorance about Islamic doctrine and history. Nothing in the history of the Jews, African-Americans (except for the Nation of Islam, the Black Panthers, etc.) or Chinese-Americans is remotely comparable to the 1,400-year war of Islamic jihadis against the rest of the world, which has raged without respite or reformation against Europe, Africa, Central Asia, India, and beyond.

But few Americans know this history, and even fewer know the truly shocking extent of the global devastation that jihad has caused. That’s why I wrote my forthcoming book The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS, which you can preorder here nowThe History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS is the first and only comprehensive one-volume history of jihad, not just against Europe and the West, but in India and worldwide, in the English language. It’s the first book to tell the whole truth about Islam’s bloody history in an age when Islamic jihadis are more assertive in Western countries than they have been for centuries.

RELATED ARTICLE: New York Times’ Laurie Goodstein attacks Pompeo and Bolton for daring to notice there’s a jihad threat

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch. Equip yourself to counter the lies that are so casually told by the likes Wa’el N. Alzayat. Preorder The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS.

Swedish government commissions, then withdraws under pressure, leaflet approving of child marriage

Why would the Swedish government issue this leaflet in the first place? Because child marriage is approved in Islam, and the Swedish government knows who the new masters of Sweden are.

“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria

“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law

There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council

“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology

Hadiths that Muslims consider authentic record that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:

“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).

Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).

Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.

Marrying young girls was not all that unusual for its time, but because in Islam Muhammad is the supreme example of conduct (cf. Qur’an 33:21), he is considered exemplary in this unto today. And so in April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.

Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:

The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.

Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”

According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.

“The National Board of Social Affairs withdraws ‘pedophile leaflet’ – was commissioned by the government,” translated from “Socialstyrelsen drar tillbaka ‘pedofilfolder’ – togs fram på uppdrag av regeringen,” Fria Tider, March 29, 2018 (thanks to Denny):

Domestic. After the morning’s quick and very powerful reactions to the National Board of Health’s new folder “Information for you who is married to a child,” the authority now withdraws the information sheet, which in social media has been accused of being a brochure for pedophiles.

It was on Thursday morning that it was discovered that the National Board of Health and Welfare published a leaflet entitled “Adapting to adults who are married to a child”.

The folder states, among other things, that it is “inappropriate for you to live together if the child is under 15 years” because it is forbidden to have sex with children under 15 in Sweden.

Nowhere in the text is there anything about prison.

In the magazine you can also read that “The Social Service may suggest that you do not live together for a shorter or longer period.”

The National Board of Health and Welfare also writes in the magazine that: “Both the Social Service and the Migration Board will work to give the child the opportunity to express his or her own opinion, where to live and how it wants it.”

“The illustrations are insensitive, it might have been suitable for information about school start or something else neutral,” says journalist Sakine Madon to SVT, pointing out that formulations like being “inappropriate if you live together” are far too soft, because child marriage is such a serious phenomenon.

After very strong reactions, the National Board of Health has decided to withdraw the material.

“The material has raised strong reactions and many views. We pull back the material and look over it, “said Petra Rinman, Unit Manager for Knowledge Center for Single Children, in a press release.

According to the National Board of Health and Welfare, the material has been developed within the framework of a government assignment to develop and disseminate information to children who are declared married, spouses, parents and other related persons with information about current laws and practice in Sweden.

The material is said to have been developed based on existing legislation.

“Sweden does not allow anyone under the age of 18 to be married in this country. However, according to current legislation, the main rule is that a marriage valid under the law of the country in which it is concluded is to be recognized in civil law in Sweden. New legislation is currently being prepared by the government, “said Pär Ödman, Chief Legal Officer of the National Board of Health.

The proposed preparation proposes “additional restrictions” for child marriages, the National Board of Health and Welfare writes. However, not a total ban.

In social media, many responded vigorously to the folder, and claimed, among other things, that it is a brochure for pedophiles….

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

Muslim gang of seven ‘predatory’ men abused girls as young as 13 in a ‘rape wagon’

Once again we see that all the perpetrators are Muslims. The UK authorities and media insist that these rape gangs are not a specifically Muslim phenomenon, yet the perpetrators are almost entirely Muslim, and the victims non-Muslim. Why? Because the abuse of non-Muslim girls and women in this way is sanctioned in Islam. But British authorities have again and again shown that they’re so afraid of appearing to be “racist” that they let these gangs operate for years, and British politicians and media still routinely lie about why this is happening.

“Child sex gang of seven ‘predatory’ men who abused girls as young as 13 in a ‘s*** wagon’ with number plate ending ‘SHG’ are convicted after jury took 24 DAYS to reach their verdict,” by Bridie Pearson-Jones, Mailonline, March 24, 2018 (thanks to Lukasz):

A sex gang of seven ‘predatory’ men have been convicted of abusing young girls.

The group of seven men aged between 37 and 47 were described as ‘predatory and cynical’ by a judge after being convicted on Friday following a five-month trial, at Oxford Crown Court.

The court heard how the gang would often abuse girls aged between 13 and 15 in a ‘s wagon’ with licence plate ending ‘SHG’.

A jury of four women and seven men took a record-breaking 107 hours and 31 minutes, over the course of 24 days, to reach their verdict.

The charges faced by the men, who each denied their part in the child sexual exploitation, included indecent assault, rape, and false imprisonment, on five victims between 1998 and 2005.

During the trial, Oxford Crown Court heard accounts from the victims, all of whom were aged between 13 and 15 at the time, who said they were plied with drink and drugs and took part in sex parties.

A number of the women also recalled a vehicle driven by the men regularly referred to as the ‘shag wagon’ – with a licence plate ending ‘SHG’.

Judge Peter Ross, who presided over the trial, said once the final verdicts were handed out: ‘Systematic and widespread grooming, that is what this case has revealed.

‘The investigation has involved countless hours of work and [the police] are entitled to commendations for the work they have done.’

He also thanked jurors for their ‘assidious’ and ‘phenomenal’ dedication to the case in returning their verdicts, following the longest jury deliberation in Oxford Crown Court history.

The lengthy trial saw seven defendants convicted – Raheem Ahmed, Moinul Islam, Kamran Khan, Kameer Iqbal, Khalid Hussain, Alladitta Yousaf and Assad Hussain.

Two others who stood trial, Saboor Abdul and Haji Khan, were acquitted of all charges. Two other men involved in proceedings cannot be named for legal reasons.

The court heard throughout the trial how the seven men on numerous occasions coerced the girls into sex at a number of addresses across Oxford.

These included at guest houses, in cars parked at lay-bys, and at local parks….

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story – and it’s every story – it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

California professor: It is Islamophobic to NOT hate Jews. Hate speech?

This is actually true — Islamic Jew-hatred is a central tenet of Islam. So if you are not a Jew-hater, you are challenging a very basic premise of Islamic texts and teachings. That is Islamophobic, is it not?

The problem here is that the professor is teaching this as if it’s a good thing, a correct hate, much like Nazi intellectuals did in the 30s.

SFSU professor says that it is Islamophobic to NOT hate Zionists

By Elder of Ziyon, March 22, 2018:

San Francisco State University president Leslie Wong

San Francisco State University president Leslie Wong clarified his earlier position about Zionism on campus, by issuing an apology and statement that read in part:

My comments about Zionists and whether or not they are welcomed at San Francisco State University caused a lot of anguish and deeply hurt feelings.  I am responsible for those words and, after study and reflection, I have come to understand how flawed my comments were.

Thus, I want to sincerely apologize for the hurt feelings and anguish my words have caused.  Let me be clear: Zionists are welcome on our campus.

I know this apology alone may not be enough.  But I am committed to a new course of dialogue and actions to ensure that my own awareness and learning will move this great university forward.  Admitting fault and desiring a path forward based upon mutual respect motivates me.  Making peace is hard work.  And hard work has long inspired me.  I hope you will join me.

In response Rabab Ibrahim Abdulhadi, Associate Professor of Ethnic Studies/Race and Resistance Studies, wrote what would be considered an astounding statement anywhere outside of academia:

I consider the statement below from President Wong, welcoming Zionists to campus, equating Jewishness with Zionism, and giving Hillel ownership of campus Jewishness, to be a declaration of war against Arabs, Muslims, Palestinians and all those who are committed to an indivisible sense of justice on and off campus….

I am ashamed to be affiliated with SFSU administration and demand the immediate retraction of this racist, Islamophobic and colonialist statement, and the restoration of SFSU social justice mission.

At a time when we are marking 50 years since the 1968 SFSU student strike and the quest to decolonize the curriculum, it is embarrassing to have our campus leadership cater to donor pressures and the Israeli lobby.

The dear academic is saying that  the statement “Zionists are welcome on our campus” to be a declaration of war, Islamophobic, racist and colonialist.

Oh, and the only reason anyone would say that a campus can welcome pro-Israel opinions is because they are getting money from the “Israeli lobby” (wink, wink.)

A fun postscript: Leslie Wong addressed Abdulhadi’s group in 2015, and described her as a “first-rate scholar, the model of the kind of person that I want around young people.” (16:53 of video.) Already at that time the professor had been known to meet with real, honest to goodness terrorists.

That’s what universities have become.

Amcha Initiative has issued a press release about Abdulhadi’s hate.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story – and it’s every story – it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

VIDEO: Muslims riot, assault people to shut down free speech at London’s ‘Speakers Corner’

The religion of peaceniks stormed the last vestige of free speech in the UK, Speakers’ Corner, the one area where open-air public speaking, debate, and discussion are allowed. Or I should say was. The last corner of freedom in the UK isn’t, and the pretense that the UK is a free country is shattered.

Abdul Hamid and his devout friends assaulted people with weapons today in front of the police. Not one of them were arrested, but the real telling thing is to watch the police not put one hand on the rioting Muslim protesters, and instead manhandle the victims by continuously pushing them away from the aggressors……Two-tier policing in full view of the people. This is Britain in 2018. (source Tommy Robinson Facebook)

Voices of freedom are banned from entering the country. I have been banned along with Robert Spencer, Lauren Southern, Brittany Pettibone and Martin Sellner — all banned because our “presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good.” In other words, Muslims might get violent, so you see, the assassin’s veto prevails in the crippled and dying UK.

Tommy Robinson vowed to deliver Martin Sellner’s speech today at Speakers’ Corner after Sellner was banned from the UK. Sellner, an Austrian and prominent figure in Generation Identity, was due to make that speech in Speakers’ Corner in Hyde Park.

This bloke sums it up rather neatly:

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story – and it’s every story – it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

VIDEO: Democrats Defend Their Admiration for Farrakhan

Unconscionable. The left is forever accusing conservatives of being Nazis, but here they are defending their support and admiration for a man who has openly praised Hitler. Who are the real Nazis? Look for the Jew-haters, the foes of the freedom of speech, the ones who advocate violence against their political opponents. Yes, the real Nazis are the “anti-fascist” leftists. Imagine if Carson and Jarrett and the rest were defending their admiration for David Duke. They would be discredited and disgraced. But no one minds this. Madness.

“WATCH: Democrat Congressman Defends Meeting Farrakhan By Attacking Jews,” by Ryan Saavedra, Daily Wire, March 9, 2018:

On Friday, Rep. Andre Carson (D-IN) admitted to meeting with radical Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan in the past and then appeared to defend himself by attacking Jews.

Fox 59 anchor Angela Ganote asked Carson to address the scandal and the Republican Jewish Coalition’s call for him and six other Democrats to resign for meeting with Farrakhan, who has openly praised Hitler in the past.

Carson responded by attacking the Republican Jewish Coalition, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Israel’s government.

“That organization doesn’t have any credibility with me. I know they have a political agenda,” Carson replied. “The Congressional Black Caucus is asking that organization to condemn Benjamin Netanyahu and the government for discriminating against Africans who are migrating, who are fleeing dictatorships, who are fleeing oppression. There’s a great deal of bigotry and racism happening right now that they failed to condemn.”

“Meghan McCain Takes on Valerie Jarrett for Likening Farrakhan to the Koch Brothers,” by Pam Key, Breitbart, March 9, 2018:

Friday on ABC’s “The View,” the panel took on the controversy over Women’s March co-chair Tamika Mallory attending a speech which included anti-Semitic rhetoric by Louis Farrakhan and her praise of the Nation of Islam leader.

Co-host Meghan McCain said, “It’s not just that she attended. She posted a photo to Instagram calling Farrakhan G.O.A.T. which means greatest of all time.”

Co-host Joy Behar said, “Let me read one thing from her point of view. She credits the Nation of Islam for supporting her after her son’s father was murdered 17 years ago, which she calls ‘the most difficult period of my life.’ So she has a personal relationship with them.”

McCain said, “Remember when we had a conversation about how CPAC was Nazi-friendly? Louis Farrakhan said, ‘Hitler was a very great man.’ This is black and white. It’s simple: You think Hitler is a great man, don’t associate with that person. There should be no normalizing of this one way or the other.”

Guest co-host Valerie Jarrett said, “Part of learning to be a leader effectively is you have to use your voice, and you have to be very clear. You work with people all the time with whom you disagree. Goodness knows I worked with the Koch brothers when we were working on criminal justice or Rupert Murdoch when we were working on immigration reform. If you want to lead an inclusive movement, you have to be clear about hate. And you have to be against it every single time.”…

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story – and it’s every story – it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.