VIDEO: Danish Bishop who aided mosque gets Islamic wake-up call

The video sums up our first wake-up call to the Mayor the 13th July and shows a new video clip of how we tried to wake up the Bishop the same day at 5:15 in the morning. The Bishop was sleeping in another place in the house, so he didn’t hear our prayer call, or so he told the freedom fighters yesterday in the Church. We just thought that he slept with earplugs.

SIAD (Stop Islamisation of Denmark) promised him on national TV that he would get to hear the prayer call. That happened today, when the Bishop led the service in the Cathedral where he heard the prayer call not only one time, but three times during the service.

We think it is very strange that a Bishop in Roskilde refused to talk with the Pope of the Catholic Church in the late Nineties, and today we have a Bishop in Roskilde who cut the first sod and spoke at a ceremony for the new mosque building with minarets. He has a firm belief that there are many ways to God – not only through Jesus and the Christian faith.

The following is a transcript from the video, of the passages that are most difficult to hear. At the end of the video, the Bishop says he has read the Quran. It does not make his case any better!

Freedom fighter: You need to hear this. When did you convert to Islam? Can’t we get an answer to this question?

Bishop: We can talk about it afterwards.

Freedom fighter: Is your congregation not allowed to know the truth?

Freedom fighter: You also support Mohammed and Islam, so the congregation needs to know your point of view, don’t they?

Bishop: I will talk to you later about that.

Freedom fighter: Why can’t the congregation know the truth?

The Church steward appears

Freedom fighter: Are you throwing me out of God’s house? I’m just talking with the bishop!

Freedom fighter: Don’t you think you have double standards? You support mosques with minarets and you still call yourself a bishop?

Freedom fighter: When can we expect to see you in the mosque – preaching about the Quran and Islam?

Freedom fighter: The church is entitled to know – why are you only talking to the two of us? You call yourself a bishop? We have kept our word: we promised you that you would hear the prayer call – we kept our promise today for both you and your congregation.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Muslim who rammed car into soldiers illegal immigrant, not known to police

There are just so many such people, French authorities can’t possibly keep track of them all. And since he wasn’t known for “extremism,” they let him alone. After all, it isn’t as if reading the Qur’an and going to mosque could “radicalize” him, right? It’s a religion of peace!

“Pictured: Algerian, 36, suspected of mowing down six soldiers outside barracks in Paris terror attack before being shot five times and arrested while ‘driving his BMW towards Calais,’” by Sara Malm, Rory Tingle, and Peter Allen, MailOnline, August 9, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

This picture is believed to show the suspected terrorist shot and arrested in connection with this morning’s attack in Paris, which saw six soldiers injured when a BMW mowed down their patrol.

Hamou Bachir, 36, is under armed guard in hospital after he was ‘seriously wounded’ in a fierce gunfight close to the northern port town of Boulogne-sur-Mer after he was intercepted driving towards Calais.

Bachir, who was not known to the security services, was shot five times, with one officer also hit by a bullet, before being arrested, according to a security source.

The suspect – who also uses the name Benlatreche – is thought to be an illegal immigrant who was subject to a ‘foreigner infraction’ notice meaning he faced deportation to Algeria, which used to be French colony.

A search is underway at a building believed to be connected to Bachir in Sartrouville.

‘The suspect was driving a black BMW identical to the one used in the attack on the soldiers,’ said the source.

‘Its number plate was recorded by video surveillance, and put out to police forces around the country.’

Bachir was speeding along the A16 motorway, towards Calais, when specialist firearms officers from nearby Lille and Rouen engaged.

The suspect is thought to have a mad ‘a sudden movement’ as if he was taking a gun out, and then he tried to escape.

It is then that bullets were fired at the man. It is not known whether he was in fact carrying a weapon.

‘The arrested individual, born in 1980, is suspected to be the culprit of the assault in the Levallois-Perret area of Paris at around 8am,’ a security source said.

‘He was driving the vehicle we were looking for and tried to flee,’ the source added, explaining why police opened fire.

Prime Minister Edouard Philippe has since confirmed that police had arrested the suspect behind the attack while speaking to MPs during parliament question time.

The anti-terrorism unit of the Paris prosecutors’ office has launched a probe into the ‘attempted killings… in relation to a terrorist undertaking’, the office said in a statement.

The driver of a dark BMW is alleged to have been waiting for the soldiers to leave the barracks in Levallois-Perret, a northwestern suburb of the capital, before speeding into the group.

Two soldiers were seriously injured in the incident, which took place at about 8am local time on Wednesday.

Levallois-Perret is meant to be one of the most secure towns in France, as it contains the headquarters of the DGSI (General Directorate for Internal Security), the country’s main counter-terrorism intelligence agency.

The security initiative was set up in 2015 following a series of atrocities inParis carried out by Islamic State and Al-Qaeda operatives….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Turkey: Muslim planned to down U.S. plane with drone at air base

UK: Muslim rape gangs weren’t probed due to “political correctness”

Lady Liberty in Hijab Hangs in Democrat Congressman Correa’s Office

Cultural jihad. When I had the Statue of Liberty in a burka on the cover of my 2010 book, people thought I was overstating it.

Now it hangs in a Congressman’s office (a Democrat, of course) — not as a warning but as an aspiration.

The art implies that we are all subjugated Muslim women. We are not.

This is deeply offensive to every freedom-loving American (and immigrant) “yearning to be free” who escaped the most brutal and extreme ideology on the face of the earth, the sharia.

Congressman J. Luis Correa, a congressional Democrat, is standing in support of gender oppression, gender apartheid, female genital mutilation and honor killing.

A PAINTING OF LADY LIBERTY IN HIJAB HANGS IN CONGRESSMAN’S OFFICE. DESPITE PROTESTS, HE SAYS IT’LL STAY

August 8, 2017, Samantha Schmidt August, Washington Post, August 8, 2017:

Each year, scores of high school students across the country compete in the Congressional Art Competition, submitting works of art for a chance to be featured at the U.S. Capitol.

Now, for the second year in a row, a teenager’s painting for the contest has become the center of a political controversy, drawing ire from conservative groups. This time around, the artwork stirred complaints even before making it to D.C.

The painting, a finalist in the competition, currently hangs in California, in the Santa Ana office of Rep. J. Luis Correa, a congressional Democrat. It depicts the Statue of Liberty wearing a hijab, holding her torch across the left side of her body.

While the painting is simply a piece of art created by a local female high school student, its symbolism is clearly political. It evokes imagery similar to other works of art that have circulated since President Trump’s election, such as the popular “We The People” poster  of a woman wearing an American flag as a hijab.

But for some conservatives, the painting has no place in the office of an elected congressman.

When local activist group We the People Rising saw the painting in Correa’s office, its members set out on a campaign to have it removed, calling it a separation of church and state issue.

Early last month, a member of the group, which advocates for stricter immigration laws, wrote a letter to Correa requesting that his office take down the painting, saying it was “not appropriate” for the public office of a congressman. The group said it received guidance from a legal consultant.

“Ultimately, to attribute a specific religion to the Statue of Liberty is inaccurate, unprofessional and offensive,” wrote Mike McGetrick, an activist in We the People Rising and a resident of Orange, Calif. “In addition, the painting displays the torch of the Statue of Liberty, not as the heralded beacon of light, but rather held awkwardly to one side — in a perplexing, even disturbing, manner.”

Since then, the group has passed out fliers in local neighborhoods, urging constituents to contact the congressman and ask him to remove the painting. It says it will organize a protest on Sept. 11 at Correa’s district office if the painting is not taken down, the Orange County Register reported.

In a videotaped meeting with a representative for Correa, McGetrick called the painting “reprehensible” and “more than a little bit insulting.”

The art “implies we welcome Syrian refugees and all that,” another group member said.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

VIDEO: California imam who called for ‘annihilation’ of Jews denounced democracy in 2016

Ammar Shahin recently called for the “annihilation” of the Jews. In the ensuing controversy, the Washington Post ran interference for him. Now the Post may have to go to bat for Shahin once again: it has come to light that last year he denounced democracy and the Constitution as “idols.”

Now, only greasy Islamophobes are supposed to believe that democracy and Islamic law are incompatible. Is Ammar Shahin a greasy Islamophobe?

“California Friday Sermon by Imam Ammar Shahin: Democracy and the Constitution Are Like Idols Made of Dates – Archival,” MEMRI, November 11, 2016:

On November 11, 2016, Imam Ammar Shahin gave a Friday sermon at the Islamic Center of Davis, California, in which he compared democracy and the constitution to “idols that the infidels used to worship, which were made from dates.” Imam Shahin said that unlike the Quran, democracy is man-made and could be changed. “You are taking democracy, the constitution, and all these matters that they fool you with… as a sacred religion now?” he asked.

MEMRI recently exposed two antisemitic sermons by Imam Shahin (for his July 21, 2017 sermon, see https://www.memri.org/tv/california-sermon-antisemitic-sermon-kill-jews-liberate-al-aqsa-mosque; for his July 14 sermon, see https://www.memri.org/tv/california-sermon-ammar-shahin-prays-allah-turn-jerusalem-palestine-into-graveyard-for-jews/). Following the Islamic Center of Davis’s claim that MEMRI had mistranslated and taken Imam Shahin’s July 21 statements out of context, MEMRI published a response: see https://memri.org/reports/memri-responds-islamic-center-daviss-statement-following-exposure-imam-shahins-july-21).

Sheikh Ammar Shahin: “You want to go and protest in the streets, if it is going to change anything? Go ahead! You chose democracy and you chose… The ruling of people is the ruling of people that could change at any time because it is a law made by the hand of humans. Therefore it could be changed. You are taking democracy, the constitution, and all these matters that they fool you with… You are taking it as a sacred religion now? It’s not Quran. It’s a change. If they want a change, they will change it. One amendment they don’t like. There you go – let’s vote to change it. Finished! It is not Quran. It is not Sahih Bukhari. It is not Sahih Muslim. This is what Muslims should know. You know this. We follow the law. We live by the law wherever we are. But know that this law could change any time. If they want to change it for you, they will, and against you, they will.

“They are talking about people getting deported – if they want to do that, they will do it. Who cares if it is against the constitution? It is not revealed by God. Muslims now have taken these matters as revelation. And you know better – that it is not. Like someone described it before – he said: These things, these matters, democracy, constitution, all of these things that people make today, are like the idols that the infidels used to worship, which were made from dates. The infidels used to worship idols from dates. They’ll make their own date idol that looks very nice. But when they get hungry, what would they do? They eat it. This is what happened. They eat their gods. Yeah, because they need it… Omar said: ‘When I look back at what I used to do, I used to make an idol from dates, and I looked at it and I worshipped it.’ He said: ‘How dumb was I – that when I get hungry, I eat my god?’ This is what they do now.”

RELATED ARTICLES:

271 jihadis have returned to France from the Islamic State, only some are in custody

Hamburg police tried to recruit supermarket jihad murderer as informant

DC Comics TV show’s new Muslim superhero declares ‘I am ISIS!’

Talk about bad taste and liberal values gone nose blind: DC’s new Muslim superhero manifests her superpower after declaring herself to be “Isis.”

“Upon holding the amulet and speaking “I am Isis“, Adrianna was transformed and instilled with the powers of the goddess.”

The cartoon battleground in the jihad war is intense. People have lost their lives drawing cartoons of Muhammad. This is such a serious offense that when ISIS irregulars came to kill Pamela Geller in Texas, the country turned on Pamela. It was all about shaming Pamela for drawing Muhammad, and saying nothing about the killers. Somehow, popular opinion got confused, and thought Pamela Geller was the villain in the story of her attempted assassination. This level of confusion is to be combined with the absolute certainty that you will not draw Muhammad.

Yes, we know this “Isis” is supposed to be the Egyptian goddess. We can tell the difference, but we are beginning to wonder about people who think it is neat to have a Muslim super-heroine declare herself to be Isis after we have seen numerous attacks on artists, and cartoonists by devout Muslims, including those who have declared allegiance to ISIS.

This is supposedly a response to the election of Donald Trump.

“You might have heard there was this election,” said Marc Guggenheim.

“Not to get political, but something that we all gravitated toward in the writers room was making this character Muslim,” he explained.

Nothing too political, you understand. And, so this is what they came up with.

“the Muslim superhero reacts to the rise of populism in 2017 and challenges the other heroes to change history to avoid the future dystopia she comes from.”

So Trump is bad, and a Muslim declaring herself to be Isis is good. This probably won’t cause as much controversy as they think, because we see so much of this in other areas of life. We had eight years of it from Obama. There is so much pandering to Islam these days that a Muslim declaring herself Isis is too coy. If they really want attention, DC should be bold and create superheroes such as “Young Bin Laden,” “Super Hezbollah,” “Hamasman,” and “the Adventures of ISIS.”

The response from the cartooning community, including Charlie Hebdo, to Islamic intimidation of cartoonists has been less than heroic. This offering from DC comes across as downright dhimmi behavior.

TV SHOW ADDS MUSLIM SUPERHERO IN RESPONSE TO TRUMP’S ELECTION – HER NAME IS INTERESTING

The Blaze, August 3, 2017

The executive producer of “DC’s Legends of Tomorrow” says that part of the motivation for adding a Muslim superhero to the show was the “political climate” after the 2016 election. He made the comments Wednesday at the Television Critics Association press tour in Beverly Hills.

“You might have heard there was this election,” said Marc Guggenheim.

“Not to get political, but something that we all gravitated toward in the writers room was making this character Muslim,” he explained.

The new hero will be introduced in the upcoming third season of the show. She is named Zari Adrianna Tomaz, a Muslim computer hacker from the future. Ironically, and rather unfortunately, the superhero is based on a character already introduced in comic books – named “Isis.”

To be clear, the ‘Isis” character is named after the Egyptian goddess of the same name, and not the Muslim extremist terrorist group.

Zaria Adrianna Tomaz will be portrayed by Iranian actress Tala Ashe.

“Representation is a really powerful thing,” said Ashe.

“When I was growing up watching television,” she explained, “I didn’t see anyone who looked like me. When I think of the kid version of myself, I think it broadens your perspective. What I think is so lovely about this show is that the Legends are this tapestry that represent America today.”

In an interview about her character, Ashe says that the Muslim superhero reacts to the rise of populism in 2017 and challenges the other heroes to change history…

Zaria Adrianna Tomaz will be portrayed by Iranian actress Tala Ashe (right).

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Colleges Treat Conservatives as Enemies, But Would Welcome a Guantanamo Inmate Yelling Death to America

This morning I was on Breitbart Radio, speaking about my book The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Free Speech (and Its Enemies):

“Robert Spencer: Colleges Treat Conservatives as Enemies, But Would Welcome a Guantanamo Inmate Yelling Death to America,” by Dan Riehl, Breitbart, July 28, 2017:

Robert Spencer, director of Jihad Watch, spoke with Breitbart News Daily SiriusXM host Raheem Kassam on Friday regarding his new book, “The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Free Speech (and Its Enemies)” and the steady erosion of free speech born by political correctness.

Said Spencer, “It is becoming impossible for people who are opposed to jihad terror and people who dissent from the leftist line in general from saying anything with any significant platform.”

Spencer said of the battle for free speech, “I spoke at three universities this past Spring and at every one it was as if Jack the Ripper was speaking. But I guarantee you that if a Guantanamo inmate showed up at any of those universities and started screaming death to America, he would have been welcomed as a hero.”

Having said the extreme left is winning the war on speech, he continued, “It’s just a fact that’s taken for granted widely that only one point of view is allowed on campuses today.”

Breitbart News Daily airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Eastern.

LISTEN:

RELATED ARTICLES:

World Council of Churches again defends Palestinian jihadists over Israel

Germany: Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” murders one, injures four, police say motive unknown

Muslim rape gang members get over $1.3M in legal aid to fight deportation

“By contrast, Chris Gard and Connie Yates were denied any legal aid in their case against Great Ormond Street Hospital to take sick 11-month-old son Charlie to the US for experimental therapy.”

The British government seems determined to appease Muslims and enable jihad terror and Sharia supremacism at all costs. The lot of them, from Theresa May on down, should be removed from office and tried for treason. But that, of course, would be “Islamophobic.”

“Anger as members of Rochdale grooming gang get legal aid to fight deportation… after already receiving £1m to unsuccessfully defend their criminal charges,” by Ian Drury, Daily Mail, July 27, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Members of an Asian grooming gang are being given legal aid to fight deportation – after it emerged they have already received more than a £1million to unsuccessfully defend criminal charges.

There was outrage last night as it was revealed the paedophiles – who preyed on girls as young as 13 – are getting more taxpayers’ money to battle moves to strip them of their British passports and send them back to Pakistan.

The case is particularly sickening because, despite the depraved nature of their crimes, the men are trying to exploit Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – which safeguards the right to family life.

The four – who raped, abused and tormented young girls – claim booting them out of the country will harm their families.

Shabir Ahmed, 64 – the ringleader of the Rochdale child sex gang – Abdul Aziz, Adil Khan and Abdul Rauf all received hundreds of thousands of pounds in legal aid at their original trial.

By contrast, Chris Gard and Connie Yates were denied any legal aid in their case against Great Ormond Street Hospital to take sick 11-month-old son Charlie to the US for experimental therapy.

Victims of the IRA Hyde Park bomb attack have also been refused legal aid to fund a private prosecution against chief suspect John Downey, 64, who is accused of murdering four soldiers and injuring 31 in the July 1982 atrocity.

David Spencer, of the Centre For Crime Prevention think-tank, said: ‘These men have been convicted of some truly abhorrent offences and it beggars belief that they are now able to run up even bigger taxpayer-funded bills making spurious appeals in an effort to extend their stay in the UK.

‘These men clearly pose a threat to public safety. If someone is born overseas and commit such crimes in the UK, it is absolutely right that their citizenship should be revoked.’…

RELATED ARTICLES:

Legal loophole means Muslim cop who killed unarmed woman may never face criminal charges

Germany: Hamburg jihadi “stopped drinking alcohol and started talking about the Quran”

Effects of Centuries of Extreme Inbreeding Among Muslims: Low IQ, Violence and Terrorism by Nicolai Sennels

Taboo: Almost half of Muslims are inbred. How does that affect intelligence and health? And is there a connection to terrorism and violence?

Lise Egholm, longtime school leader in the Muslim-dominated area of Nørrebro in Copenhagen, Denmark, recently warned against not talking about the widespread practise of inbreeding among Muslims:

“A study shows that infant mortality doubles, along with a high risk of congenital malformations, also that increased birth defect rates and inheritance of recessive traits are more common in consanguineous marriages. I think it’s time to express concern. We must talk about this problem. All parents want healthy children. Fortunately, we live in a society where our health system does much to ensure that a pregnancy ends with a viable child. What amazes me and has made me wonder for years is why we do not talk about, maybe they even ban, the many cousin marriages?”

While health systems in otherwise less-developed countries in the Muslim world are openly discussing and warning against consanguineous marriages, it is considered politically incorrect in the West to regard as a problem the vast genetic and societal difficulties resulting from this religious-cultural practise.

Prevalence

Statistical research on Arabic countries shows that up to 34 percent of all marriages in Algiers are consanguineous (cousin marriages), 46 percent in Bahrain, 33 percent in Egypt, 80 percent in Nubia (southern area in Egypt), 60 percent in Iraq, 64 percent in Jordan, 64 percent in Kuwait, 42 percent in Lebanon, 48 percent in Libya, 47 percent in Mauritania, 54 percent in Qatar, 67 percent in Saudi Arabia, 63 percent in Sudan, 40 percent in Syria, 39 percent in Tunisia, 54 percent in the United Arab Emirates and 45 percent in Yemen (Reproductive Health Journal, 2009 Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs). In Pakistan, 70 percent of marriages are consanguineous, and in Turkey, the percentage is 25-30. There seems to be no national data on Indonesia, but there are reports on 17 percent consanguinity on East Timor and a high level of consanguineous marriages in some areas of Java.”

Full story at 10news.one

RELATED ARTICLES:

Anni Cyrus Video: Muslim Killer “Cops” and Why Only Muslim Lives Matter

Glazov Gang: ISIS’s Horrifying How-To Terror Manual

22-year-old Muslim takes 5-year-old bride

“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria

“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law

There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council

“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology

Few things are more abundantly attested in Islamic law than the permissibility of child marriage. Islamic tradition records that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:

“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).

Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).

Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.

Marrying young girls was not all that unusual for its time, but because in Islam Muhammad is the supreme example of conduct (cf. Qur’an 33:21), he is considered exemplary in this unto today. And so in April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.

Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:

The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.

Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”

According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.

“Police arrest culprits after 5-year-old girl married to 22-year-old man near Shikarpur,” by Hanif Samoon, Dawn, July 22, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

A five-year-old girl was on Saturday married off to a 22-year-old man at village Raman Shar in the outskirts of Dakhan Town, some 40 kilometres from Shikarpur, before police intervened to arrest key individuals involved, local police said.

According to an official, a special police party headed by SHO Khuda Bakhsh Panhwar raided the ceremony and succeeded in arresting the nikkah khwan, Molvi Kifayatullah Bhutto, 40, the ‘groom’, Habibullah Shar, and the father of the groom, Gul Meer. The police also took the five-year-old bride, the daughter of Zameer Shar, into custody along with her mother.

According to police sources, the marriage had been solemnised before police reached the place….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Jordan: Muslims attack Israeli embassy in Amman, murder Israeli security guard

Orban: “Europe must regain sovereignty from the Soros empire,’ build border wall to stop ‘Muslimized Europe’

Muslim migrants riot, attack police trying to arrest Muslims who sexually assaulted girls

Merkel’s new Germany in the full flower of multiculturalism.

“Girl, 17, is sexually assaulted by ‘three Afghan asylum seekers’ and Iraqi migrant is accused of sexual harassment as youths riot at German music festival,” MailOnline, July 17, 2017:

A German folk festival descended into violence after Iraqi and Afghan asylum seekers were accused of sexually harassing local women, it has been reported.

Several cases of sexual harassment and aggression were reported at Volksfest in the town of Schorndorf, Baden-Wuerttemberg state, police said.

No arrests have been made but police are treating a 20-year-old Iraqi man as a suspect – and three Afghan asylum seekers in a separate incident in which a 17-year-old girl was groped.

A crowd of more than 1,000 are reported to have hurled bottles at police officers who moved in to detain one of the suspects on charges of dangerous physical assault.

Police said small groups of youths, many of whom are said to be immigrants, then began to vandalise the town which is home to just 40,000 people.

Authorities claimed they were roving through the streets armed with knives and replica handguns, firing flares and teargas….

He said ‘the aggression and escalation of violence’ was unprecedented in the town, near Stuttgart, and that the local police force had to request backup from other cities.

Police said in a statement that many youths ‘with migrant backgrounds’ were seen in the crowd, but Eisele said that it was impossible to estimate a percentage.

In a press conference Monday, Eisele evoked the chaos of Cologne’s infamous 2015 New Year’s Eve celebrations when men of North African and Middle Eastern appearance groped and assaulted hundreds of women, sparking widespread public outrage….

RELATED ARTICLES:

The 20 diseases ‘refugees’ bring into the West

Merkel Rejects Limit On Refugees. Meanwhile, Jihadists Terrorize Germany.

Robert Spencer: The West Adopts Sharia Blasphemy Laws

UK: Islamic State supporter who mocked jihad victims has worked in numerous state schools