VIDEO: British TV promotes a violent, racist, religious extremist Muslim woman

How marvelous the new multicultural Britain is. And just imagine what it will look like in five years.

“Anti-White Islamist Gets Promoted As ‘Muslim Woman Fighting Stereotypes’ On UK TV,” by Ian Miles Cheong, Daily Caller, August 28, 2017:

UK’s Channel 4 produced a short documentary last week celebrating a woman with a history of posting violent, racist, and religious extremist rhetoric online as an example of a “Muslim woman fighting back by rejecting stereotypes.”

Nadia Chan, a self-described “anti-colonialist Islamist” described Jews as “parasites” and called for violent militancy against the British government and white people. She has also called on Muslims to support “armed resistance from the Islamic Jihad […] and also Hamas,” on Islamic state TV.

Chan’s tweets ranged from hostility against whites and Jewish people, quotes by Robert Mugabe, and calls for violence against the police. She even advocated support for North Korea, Venezuela’s undemocratic socialist government, and the Castro regime in Cuba.

“The only white man you can trust is a dead white man,” she wrote, quoting Mugabe.

“We need straight up militancy, they trying to kill us and they’re getting brave. These honkies will kill more unless they are stopped,” she wrote.

In an anti-Jewish tweet, Chan called for the destruction of the “parasitic entity known as ‘Israel’.” “Furthermore, every single Israel is a parasite,” she added.

She expressed ceaseless hatred against white people, describing them as “parasites” and “cave people” in various tweets.

Nadia Chan also advocated her belief that Europeans were “given” the invention of soap by Muslims. “Actually Muslims (90% Pakistan is Muslim) clean themselves 5 times a day, unlike u dirty white cave parasites, muslims gave y’all soap remember.”…

RELATED ARTICLES:

Barcelona jihad murderer began praying more before his attack

Germany: Police investigate after anti-mass migration party gives out pepper spray to women

First Survey of Muslims In France Reveals Love for Sharia [Islamic] Law and Bin Laden

Dateline, Paris, France 2016: There is a reputable think tank in France called “Institut Montaigne.” The Institut Montaigne is a French think tank founded by Claude Bébéar in 2000 (he is a successful French businessman – a Warren Buffet of France. He is the founder and former CEO of AXA, a global financial services giant based in Paris). The Institut Montaigne was founded with the aim to promote both competitiveness and social cohesion and to help shape public policy to improve both economic and social environment in France. In translation – this means that the entrenched parasitical interests of profit and money wish to pacify French patriotism in order to allow the world to run over the nation of France in the interests of worldwide economic profit. The true capitalists of the West (masters of the democracy of the stock-exchange) have long ago betrayed the national interests of the countries in which they began. Still, Institut Montaigne is not as bad as it could be. It leans conservative, even though it is on the fence about many important issues on which the Left must be opposed because they lead to the ultimate suicide of France and the West. It almost broke a taboo in conducting a survey of Muslims. So this think tank produced recently an important survey of the French Muslims in which some startling findings were presentedChief among them is the preference for Shariah Law over any other among a full third of the French Muslims – and that Bin Laden’s Islam of no compromise is craved by a half of young French Muslims! The secular education system fit for spiritless materialists has failed! The emperor has no clothes! French culture, French literature, French history and the biographies of prominent men of French history – absolutely DO NOT inspire the immigrant Muslims in France – but ISIS and the Islamic culture of violence does!?

Benoit Rayski wrote a cynical assessment of the Institut Montaigne survey on Muslim attitudes and preferences because the reality of the situation forced him into the cynical corner. The cowardly LEFT misrepresents survey results to make the public drugged by lies into the sleepiness of the oblivion in which the West will perish unless an awakening is made to happen somehow. Rayski is a historian, a somewhat conservative writer, and journalist, one of a few Frenchmen with public access that are unafraid to speak up.

Of course, we would be reasonable to assume that those Muslims who responded to the survey better or more favorably to France’s interests are not clearly separated from their brethren that are openly supporting the radical Islam sentiment. A sizeable chunk of them could be considered as leaning radical, at the end of the day – just as their sympathies lie against Israel, which is always a solid litmus test of bottom-line Islamic attitudes.

How can France survive as a nation? Bear in mind that nations are NOT economic units (contrary to what the Left will falsely make you believe) but political, cultural and ultimately – spiritual entities or unities emerging from the depths of political history! No economics can ever create a nation! So, economic immigration is a death-knell for every Western nation. It is a sign of an inorganic state of the West, because economics by themselves cannot be in the interest of any nation, just as people need food but don’t live just to eat!That is what history proper teaches us. How can we make the Left understand its errors? Are surveys enough? Of course, no….

MUSLIMS OF FRANCE: THE SURVEY THAT SURPRISES? NO, THE SURVEY IS SCARY!

Often, just as it is in the case of gifts, everything is a matter of packaging. The gift papers are, according to the designers who designed them, more or less pretty. And there – this is the Journal du Dimanche – which presented a terrible survey in packaging that has been treated so that the appearance is full of charm. But inside, it’s all but a gift …

In the “one” of the newspaper, this title appeared as a result of the published survey: “Muslims of France, the inquiry that surprises”. And we rush – a surprise, it’s always tempting – to see. The investigation for the survey, thorough and meticulous, was carried out by Ifop for the Institut Montaigne.

And, in a first impulse, we let ourselves be taken in by the packaging. The figures that are highlighted give off the sweet and soothing fragrance of the roses of our gardens. Coeducation ? “Do you agree to go to a mixed pool?” Answer: 75% yes in men, 56% in women. It’s good, no? “Are you in favor of wearing the full veil?” Answer: 65% not in men, 61% in women. It’s not too bad, right?

But we have the temptation – diabolical, not to say Islamophobic – to tear the wrapper in order to savor indiscriminately what is inside. The same figures quoted above say that 25% of men and 39% of women refuse to go to a mixed swimming pool! It’s worse, isn’t it? They also say, in these figures, that 20% of men and 39% of women agree on the full veil! That too is more or less good, isn’t it?

We continue ? Yes, and it will be even better. 29% of the Muslims and Muslims surveyed say that the Sharia is more important than the law of the Republic! Yes, 29%, that is to say a third of the population who declare themselves Muslim … This figure is not worrying: it is appalling. And to add to this – a [Muslim] declaration of war on France, for it is specified in the survey that this devouring passion for a rigorous, fundamentalist Islam is overrepresented among young Muslims: 50% of the under 25 years fervently advocate it!

I’m sorry to have to remove the veil (no pun intended) which is the subject of this survey’s investigation … Sorry also to say that, alas, there is nothing, strictly nothing, surprising in this survey. We all know, and for a long time, what is the status of Islam in France. It was subdued and seething: the figures, naked and cruel, prove it. So much the worse for the obtuse and blind supporters of the “no amalgam Islam”, the so-called religion of peace and love.

It is true that the expert of the Institut Montaigne who comments on these damning results tries to relativize them with a new concept. For him, we must just see the consequence of a breath of revolt which he calls “Islamic pride” (very naive). A bit like the “gay pride” that allowed homosexuals to show themselves and assert themselves. Do not stop here. Will we see one day a “catholic pride”, a “jew pride”, a “french pride”? And why not a “corsica pride”? Ah! But that’s already done.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Muslim gives finger to security cameras, urinates on front door of Philadelphia synagogue

Islamic Jew-hatred — it’s in the Quran. Imagine an ideology, a world where this is righteous. And that it is demanded, that we respect it. Well, we live in that world.

Why don’t Apple, J. P. Morgan and George Clooney give to our organizations to fight this bigotry and hate? No, instead, they support organizations such as the SPLC that censor, scrub and work in the cause of Islam.

Philadelphia: Muslim gives finger to security cameras, urinates on front door of synagogue

August 27, 2017, thanks to Robert Spencer:

The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).

“Bail set at $50,000 for suspect who urinated on Northeast Philly synagogue’s front door,” by Valerie Russ, Philly.com, August 16, 2017 (thanks to Creeping Sharia):

The man suspected of urinating on the front door of a Northeast Philadelphia synagogue and giving the finger to a security camera recording the act was arraigned on a host of charges Wednesday, including ethnic intimidation and indecent exposure.

Police said bail for Sheidali Dzhalilov was set at $50,000, but it was unclear Wednesday night whether he was still in custody.

On Tuesday night, Dzhalilov, 23, of the 2100 block of Hoffnagle Street in the Rhawnhurst section of the city, turned himself in to Northeast Detectives and announced that he was the man seen on the surveillance recordings desecrating the synagogue. The footage, released by investigators Monday, shows a man dressed in a white shirt and dark jeans walk up to Congregation Beth Solomon at 198 Tomlinson Rd. about 12:30 a.m. Sunday and urinate on the front door and the sidewalk. After emptying his bladder, he leaves in a white sedan, but not before making an obscene gesture toward the surveillance camera. The man’s face was clearly visible.

Police on Wednesday also charged Dzhalilov with institutional vandalism, desecration objects, open lewdness, harassment, and disorderly conduct.

In an interview Wednesday night, Rabbi Solomon Isaacson, founder of Beth Solomon, said he was relieved that a suspect was in custody. Beth Solomon has been vandalized two other times within the last 12 months. In September, a menorah was taken from outside the building, and in January, someone spray-painted graffiti on the wall of a nearby shopping center where the synagogue’s ritual bath is housed….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Rebel Media: Silicon Valley’s war on free speech

Wasserman Schultz’ ‘Islamophobia’ Claim Prompts Angered Marine To Go Public On Muslim IT Spies

Modern Left Uses the Soviet Model for Islam Policy

Israel: “Palestinian” Muslim prisoner released in Gilad Schalit exchange rearrested

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Muslim migrant preacher who called for deaths of non-Muslims got $620,000 in welfare payments

“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).

UK jihad preacher Anjem Choudary said in February 2013:

“We are on Jihad Seekers Allowance, We take the Jizya (protection money paid to Muslims by non-Muslims) which is ours anyway. The normal situation is to take money from the Kafir (non-Muslim), isn’t it? So this is normal situation. They give us the money. You work, give us the money. Allah Akbar, we take the money. Hopefully there is no one from the DSS (Department of Social Security) listening. Ah, but you see people will say you are not working. But the normal situation is for you to take money from the Kuffar (non-Muslim) So we take Jihad Seeker’s Allowance.”

“Refugee hate preacher received $620K in social benefits in Switzerland – media,” RT, August 23, 2017 (thanks to David):

A Libyan immigrant who called on Allah to “destroy” non-Muslims during his prayer in a Swiss mosque claimed $620,000 in social benefits for over a decade from a predominantly Christian state, local media report.

In his hate speech, Abu Ramadan called on Allah “to destroy the enemies of our religion,” Switzerland’s SRF broadcaster reported, citing an audio recording in its possession.

The “enemies” according to the preacher included “Jews, Christians, Hindus, Russians and the Shia [branch of Islam].”

Yet, Ramadan received some 600,000 Swiss francs ($620,000) in social benefits from the Swiss government over the last 13 years, according to research conducted by the Rundschau program of SRF and the Tages Anzeiger newspaper.

According to the newspaper, the man came to seek refuge in Switzerland in 1998 after he fled his homeland, explaining that he’d been pursued by authorities for spreading religious propaganda for the Muslim Brotherhood.

With political asylum granted and a residence permit, the 64-year-old Ramadan hardly ever worked, instead living on social payments from 2004 until 2017.

Ramadan, who can barely speak French or German according to news outlets, is said have preached in small towns of Biel and Neuchâtel, as well appeared on the Libyan Islamic channel, Tanaush TV.

In addition, research claims to have found his pictures at luxury hotels, made when he accompanied pilgrims to Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia.

Through a statement by his lawyer, the preacher claimed to Tages Anzeiger that he respects other religions. “Love, tolerance and generosity are my guideline in my relations with Muslims and non-Muslims,” the statement reads.

However, according to the tape obtained by the Swiss outlets, he also preached that “a person who befriends a disbeliever is cursed until the Day of Judgment.” In fact, the man apparently never studied theology and also denied being an imam, the newspaper says….

RELATED ARTICLES:

PayPal blocks German counterjihad site PI News

Video: Robert Spencer on Google changing its search results to spike criticism of Islam

American Muslim boy in ISIS video calls Trump ‘puppet of the Jews,’ vows jihad massacres in U.S.

Cute little lad. Imagine what will happen when young Yusuf meets up with the young Americans who have been trained to be enraged over public bathrooms and sensitive to microaggressions.

“American boy in ISIS video warns Trump ‘puppet of the Jews,’” by Lisa Daftari, Foreign Desk, August 23, 2017:

The Islamic State has released a new propaganda video featuring an American boy who speaks directly to President Trump, calling him “the puppet of the Jews” and warns that “this battle will not end in Raqqa or Mosul;” it will end in the United States.

In the video, entitled The Fertile Nation 4, the young boy, identifying himself as 10-year-old “Yusuf,” says he made hijrah, or pilgrimage, to the Caliphate from America, “the land of the Kuffar (nonbeliever)” along with his mother two years ago. He is now in Raqqa, he says.

According to Yusuf, his father is an American soldier who served in Iraq, and without any knowledge about Islam, he began to learn once he reached the Islamic State.

He roots his threats to President Trump and the American people on an “Allah” who has “promised victory and not defeat,” and ends with “so get ready because the fighting has just begun.”

“We will remain until the day of judgement,” his 7-year-old ‘comrade’ says in the video, as an instructor shows them how to adjust the lens on viewfinder mounted on top of a gun.

In the past, the Islamic State has frequently called upon its native English speakers from England, Australia, South Africa and the U.S. to deliver stern warnings in its videos in English and to demonstrate the interest of Western supporter to the jihadi cause.

Also typical of previous ISIS videos, Yusuf again mentions U.S. culpability in the bombing Raqqa with “all kind of bombs including phosphorus shells.”

He introduces a friend, “Abdullah from Sinjar,” a 7-year-old who says he is a Yazidi who was abducted by ISIS when they captured Sinjar. He continues that he lives with Yusuf and is now learning about Islam.

“Islam is what unites Yusuf and I together” he says, with subsequent video footage of the two boys walking in a Raqqa playground followed by showing homes that they allege were targeted by the U.S.-led coalition….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Maryland imam bankrolled purchase of weapons for jihad massacre inside U.S.

Australia: Jihad plot to blow up plane with bomb hidden in Barbie doll

Jew-hating pro-BDS professors organizing Antifa campus network

The nation’s universities are such toxic environments of leftist Jew-hatred that this teaming-up of BDS profs with Antifa was inevitable. It will increase the violence that we already see on campuses, and the forcible shutting-down of any remaining voices of sanity and reason.

If you love your children, don’t send them to college today. They’re not institutions of higher learning. They’re radioactive deserts of leftist indoctrination.

“Anti-Israel pro-BDS profs organizing Antifa campus network,” by William A. Jacobson, Legal Insurrection, August 17, 2017:

The teaming of BDS and Antifa is the single most dangerous development I have witnessed in many years

Female BDS protester in San Francisco in July, 2014.

The anti-Israel Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement is notorious for campus violence and disruption directed at Israelis and pro-Israeli students and faculty.

We have featured dozens of incidents of shout-downs and disruptions of events, including physical acts of intimidation. Many of these incidents are discussed in our post, With campus shout downs, first they came for the Jews and Israel.

In an extremely dangerous development, anti-Israel pro-BDS faculty are organizing a nationwide campus Antifa network.

Inside Higher Ed reports, Campus Antifascist Network (h/t Cam Edwards on Twitter):

Given that college campuses have been central to activism by the so-called alt-right, is it time for a campus-based countermovement? Scholars behind the proposed Campus Antifascist Network, or CAN, think so.

“The election of Donald Trump has emboldened fascist and white nationalist groups nationwide, on campus and off, and their recent upsurge requires antifascists to take up the call to action once again,” reads an invitation to join the group, posted on social media this week by David Palumbo-Liu, the Louise Hewlett Nixon Professor and professor of comparative literature at Stanford University….

Network co-organizer Bill Mullen, a professor of American studies at Purdue University, on Wednesday called CAN a “big tent” that “welcomes anyone committed to fighting fascism.”

“We are diverse in our political points of view but unified by our fight against fascism,” he said. The idea is “to drive racists off campuses and to protect the most vulnerable from fascist attack.”

And of objections made by some that Trump is not a fascist? Palumbo-Liu said that is “literally an academic argument in the worst sense of the word. We need to pay attention to what is happening, not the labels that we feel are most fitting.” ….

Since Charlottesville, the network has jumped to 200 members and 1,000 followers on its Facebook page, Mullen said. Antifascist branches are being formed on campuses and the group is preparing teach-ins and self-defense materials for faculty and students who may meet with white supremacist protesters.

The network has been endorsed by writers Junot Díaz and Viet Nguyen, as well as graduate student unions. In addition to faculty members, graduate students and some undergraduates have joined.

According to the Inside Higher Ed article, they claim they are not seeking violence, but the wording of their responses is ambiguous:

Mullen said CAN’s approach to protests will be to protect those most vulnerable to attack and “to build large, unified demonstrations against fascists on campuses when they come.”

Asked specifically about the possible use of violence, Palumbo-Liu said antifa activists include those whose tactics CAN would reject. “We would advocate self-defense and defense in various forms of those who are being threatened by fascists, but not violence,” he added, saying his group can’t control the antifa label or who ascribes to it.

Palumbo-Liu and Mullen, the organizers of the campus Antifa network, are two of the most aggressive anti-Israel pro-BDS faculty members in the country. They each have long histories of demonizing Israel and supporting the academic boycott of Israel.

Palumbo-Liu, who was once dubbed Stanford’s Most Radical Professor, was featured in a post we did about the dangerous blockade of the San Mateo Bridge by anti-Israel protesters, Anti-Israel activists caused car crashes on San Mateo Bridge.

. Palumbo-Liu expressed pride that some of this students were involved:

https://twitter.com/palumboliu/status/557394707970420736

Mullen also is one of the most aggressive BDS faculty activists, well known for his BDS activities at Purdue.

This fits a pattern of anti-Israel activists co-opting and hijacking other movements, something we explored in If you are surprised #BlackLivesMatter joined war on Israel, you haven’t been paying attention.

Under the leadership of anti-Israel, pro-BDS faculty, expect the campus Antifa network to be re-directed against Israel, Israelis and Jews. We’ve seen this in Chicago, where Jewish symbols were banned at an LGBT event, and Jewish LGBT groups have been attacked….

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau Objects to Calling Honor Killings Barbaric

Meagan Fitzpatrick from CBC News in a column titled “Trudeau retracts ‘barbaric’ remarks” reported:

Liberal MP Justin Trudeau offered an apology and retraction Tuesday over comments he made about the description of honour killings as “barbaric” in a new citizenship guide.

The apology came shortly after the Montreal MP spent most of his morning trying to defend and explain his comments on the social media website Twitter.

“Perhaps I got tangled in semantic weeds in my comments, particularly in view of the Conservatives’ cynicism on these issues,” Trudeau said in a statement. “I want to make it clear that I think the acts described are heinous, barbaric acts that are totally unacceptable in our society.”

The controversy around Trudeau started brewing on Monday when the MP, who is immigration critic for his party, was asked for reaction to the government’s new citizenship guide released earlier in the day. The publication is used as the study guide for Canada’s citizenship test.

The updated Discover Canada booklet includes a line that says, “Canada’s openness and generosity do not extend to barbaric cultural practices that tolerate spousal abuse, ‘honour killings,’ female genital mutilation, forced marriage or other gender-based violence.”

The term “barbaric” has been in the guide since 2009, but “forced marriage” was added to the line in this new version.

Trudeau took the government to task, however, for using the term “barbaric” and said an official government publication should make an “attempt at responsible neutrality.” He said the acts are “absolutely unacceptable” and that’s not a matter of debate, but the language chosen by the government to describe them is objectionable, the MP said.

Statement by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau saying he thinks the government shouldn’t call honour killings barbaric.

VIDEO: Danish Bishop who aided mosque gets Islamic wake-up call

The video sums up our first wake-up call to the Mayor the 13th July and shows a new video clip of how we tried to wake up the Bishop the same day at 5:15 in the morning. The Bishop was sleeping in another place in the house, so he didn’t hear our prayer call, or so he told the freedom fighters yesterday in the Church. We just thought that he slept with earplugs.

SIAD (Stop Islamisation of Denmark) promised him on national TV that he would get to hear the prayer call. That happened today, when the Bishop led the service in the Cathedral where he heard the prayer call not only one time, but three times during the service.

We think it is very strange that a Bishop in Roskilde refused to talk with the Pope of the Catholic Church in the late Nineties, and today we have a Bishop in Roskilde who cut the first sod and spoke at a ceremony for the new mosque building with minarets. He has a firm belief that there are many ways to God – not only through Jesus and the Christian faith.

The following is a transcript from the video, of the passages that are most difficult to hear. At the end of the video, the Bishop says he has read the Quran. It does not make his case any better!

Freedom fighter: You need to hear this. When did you convert to Islam? Can’t we get an answer to this question?

Bishop: We can talk about it afterwards.

Freedom fighter: Is your congregation not allowed to know the truth?

Freedom fighter: You also support Mohammed and Islam, so the congregation needs to know your point of view, don’t they?

Bishop: I will talk to you later about that.

Freedom fighter: Why can’t the congregation know the truth?

The Church steward appears

Freedom fighter: Are you throwing me out of God’s house? I’m just talking with the bishop!

Freedom fighter: Don’t you think you have double standards? You support mosques with minarets and you still call yourself a bishop?

Freedom fighter: When can we expect to see you in the mosque – preaching about the Quran and Islam?

Freedom fighter: The church is entitled to know – why are you only talking to the two of us? You call yourself a bishop? We have kept our word: we promised you that you would hear the prayer call – we kept our promise today for both you and your congregation.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Muslim who rammed car into soldiers illegal immigrant, not known to police

There are just so many such people, French authorities can’t possibly keep track of them all. And since he wasn’t known for “extremism,” they let him alone. After all, it isn’t as if reading the Qur’an and going to mosque could “radicalize” him, right? It’s a religion of peace!

“Pictured: Algerian, 36, suspected of mowing down six soldiers outside barracks in Paris terror attack before being shot five times and arrested while ‘driving his BMW towards Calais,’” by Sara Malm, Rory Tingle, and Peter Allen, MailOnline, August 9, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

This picture is believed to show the suspected terrorist shot and arrested in connection with this morning’s attack in Paris, which saw six soldiers injured when a BMW mowed down their patrol.

Hamou Bachir, 36, is under armed guard in hospital after he was ‘seriously wounded’ in a fierce gunfight close to the northern port town of Boulogne-sur-Mer after he was intercepted driving towards Calais.

Bachir, who was not known to the security services, was shot five times, with one officer also hit by a bullet, before being arrested, according to a security source.

The suspect – who also uses the name Benlatreche – is thought to be an illegal immigrant who was subject to a ‘foreigner infraction’ notice meaning he faced deportation to Algeria, which used to be French colony.

A search is underway at a building believed to be connected to Bachir in Sartrouville.

‘The suspect was driving a black BMW identical to the one used in the attack on the soldiers,’ said the source.

‘Its number plate was recorded by video surveillance, and put out to police forces around the country.’

Bachir was speeding along the A16 motorway, towards Calais, when specialist firearms officers from nearby Lille and Rouen engaged.

The suspect is thought to have a mad ‘a sudden movement’ as if he was taking a gun out, and then he tried to escape.

It is then that bullets were fired at the man. It is not known whether he was in fact carrying a weapon.

‘The arrested individual, born in 1980, is suspected to be the culprit of the assault in the Levallois-Perret area of Paris at around 8am,’ a security source said.

‘He was driving the vehicle we were looking for and tried to flee,’ the source added, explaining why police opened fire.

Prime Minister Edouard Philippe has since confirmed that police had arrested the suspect behind the attack while speaking to MPs during parliament question time.

The anti-terrorism unit of the Paris prosecutors’ office has launched a probe into the ‘attempted killings… in relation to a terrorist undertaking’, the office said in a statement.

The driver of a dark BMW is alleged to have been waiting for the soldiers to leave the barracks in Levallois-Perret, a northwestern suburb of the capital, before speeding into the group.

Two soldiers were seriously injured in the incident, which took place at about 8am local time on Wednesday.

Levallois-Perret is meant to be one of the most secure towns in France, as it contains the headquarters of the DGSI (General Directorate for Internal Security), the country’s main counter-terrorism intelligence agency.

The security initiative was set up in 2015 following a series of atrocities inParis carried out by Islamic State and Al-Qaeda operatives….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Turkey: Muslim planned to down U.S. plane with drone at air base

UK: Muslim rape gangs weren’t probed due to “political correctness”

Lady Liberty in Hijab Hangs in Democrat Congressman Correa’s Office

Cultural jihad. When I had the Statue of Liberty in a burka on the cover of my 2010 book, people thought I was overstating it.

Now it hangs in a Congressman’s office (a Democrat, of course) — not as a warning but as an aspiration.

The art implies that we are all subjugated Muslim women. We are not.

This is deeply offensive to every freedom-loving American (and immigrant) “yearning to be free” who escaped the most brutal and extreme ideology on the face of the earth, the sharia.

Congressman J. Luis Correa, a congressional Democrat, is standing in support of gender oppression, gender apartheid, female genital mutilation and honor killing.

A PAINTING OF LADY LIBERTY IN HIJAB HANGS IN CONGRESSMAN’S OFFICE. DESPITE PROTESTS, HE SAYS IT’LL STAY

August 8, 2017, Samantha Schmidt August, Washington Post, August 8, 2017:

Each year, scores of high school students across the country compete in the Congressional Art Competition, submitting works of art for a chance to be featured at the U.S. Capitol.

Now, for the second year in a row, a teenager’s painting for the contest has become the center of a political controversy, drawing ire from conservative groups. This time around, the artwork stirred complaints even before making it to D.C.

The painting, a finalist in the competition, currently hangs in California, in the Santa Ana office of Rep. J. Luis Correa, a congressional Democrat. It depicts the Statue of Liberty wearing a hijab, holding her torch across the left side of her body.

While the painting is simply a piece of art created by a local female high school student, its symbolism is clearly political. It evokes imagery similar to other works of art that have circulated since President Trump’s election, such as the popular “We The People” poster  of a woman wearing an American flag as a hijab.

But for some conservatives, the painting has no place in the office of an elected congressman.

When local activist group We the People Rising saw the painting in Correa’s office, its members set out on a campaign to have it removed, calling it a separation of church and state issue.

Early last month, a member of the group, which advocates for stricter immigration laws, wrote a letter to Correa requesting that his office take down the painting, saying it was “not appropriate” for the public office of a congressman. The group said it received guidance from a legal consultant.

“Ultimately, to attribute a specific religion to the Statue of Liberty is inaccurate, unprofessional and offensive,” wrote Mike McGetrick, an activist in We the People Rising and a resident of Orange, Calif. “In addition, the painting displays the torch of the Statue of Liberty, not as the heralded beacon of light, but rather held awkwardly to one side — in a perplexing, even disturbing, manner.”

Since then, the group has passed out fliers in local neighborhoods, urging constituents to contact the congressman and ask him to remove the painting. It says it will organize a protest on Sept. 11 at Correa’s district office if the painting is not taken down, the Orange County Register reported.

In a videotaped meeting with a representative for Correa, McGetrick called the painting “reprehensible” and “more than a little bit insulting.”

The art “implies we welcome Syrian refugees and all that,” another group member said.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.