Rapists and wife-beaters flocked to join ISIS

Of course. Islam justifies both.

A hadith depicts Muhammad saying:

“If a husband calls his wife to his bed [i.e. to have sexual relation] and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning” (Bukhari 4.54.460).

Another hadith attributes this to Muhammad:

“By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself [to him for sexual intercourse] she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel’s saddle” (Ibn Majah 1854).

The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.

As as for wife-beating:

“Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” — Qur’an 4:34

Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?” — Aisha (Sahih Muslim 2127)

“Rapists and wife-beaters flocked to join ISIS because the group’s systemised sexual violence appealed to them, study shows,” by Iain Burns, Mailonline, October 9, 2017 (thanks to Robert):

A new study has shown that many men with a history of sexual violence and domestic abuse joined ISIS because of the group’s use of slavery and rape.

The Henry Jackson Society report claims the sanctioning of systemic sexual abuse served as a way of ‘attracting, retaining, mobilising and rewarding fighters’.

It was also used as a means of delivering cruel punishment to ‘kafir’ – non-Muslims – and as a form of terrorism.

With slavery and rape given Islamic justification by the depraved group’s theologians, sexual exploitation was also used as a way of raising cash for the caliphate.

The study shows many ISIS fighters from the US and Europe had a background of abusing women, which implies a relationship between ‘committing terrorist attacks and having a history of physical and/or sexual violence’.

One infamous jihadist described as key in the savage persecution of non-Muslims in ISIS territory is the Briton Siddhartha Dhar.

The father-of-four, once a bouncy castle salesman in Walthamstow, is said to have even enslaved some Yazidi women and girls himself and regularly taken part in trafficking.

The Yazidis, deemed by ISIS to be ‘pagans’ that can be raped and enslaved without consequence, have provided much of the supply of women and girls for the group.

According to the report, the prospect of having unlimited access to women was intentionally advertised to attract men from conservative Islamic societies where casual sex is prohibited.

The group also sanctioned forced conversions and pregnancies after women were enslaved or abused as a means of adding to the ranks of the extremist cult.

Another Briton with a history of sexual violence – Ondogo Ahmed, from London, who was jailed for eight years after raping a 16-year-old girl – joined the group in 2013.

He fled to the caliphate in Syria when out of prison on licence.

Nikita Malik, the author of the report, was quoted in The Guardian as saying: ‘These cases indicate an existence of a type of terrorism that is sexually motivated, in which individuals with prior records of sexual violence are attracted by the sexual brutality carried out by members of Islamic State.’

Other men with a past of domestic or sexual abuse include London Bridge murderer Rachid Redouane and Westminster terrorist Khalid Masood….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Supreme Court throws out appeals court ruling that struck down Trump’s previous temporary travel ban

Belgium moves to expel “extremist” imam of Saudi-funded Brussels Grand Mosque

‘Allahu Akbar’ scrawled on Jewish home, 10-year-old Jewish girl beaten by classmates

It’s very likely that those classmates were also adherents of the Religion of Peace. Jews have not had this kind of trouble in France since World War II, until this period of massive Muslim immigration.

The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).

“French girl hospitalized following classmates’ antisemitic attack,” JTA, October 7, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

A 10-year-old girl was assaulted by her classmates and the home of a family was daubed with racist graffiti in two Paris-area incidents deemed antisemitic.

The alleged assault was reported to France’s ministry of education by the National Bureau for Vigilance Against Antisemitism, or BNVCA, the watchdog group wrote in a statement on its website Tuesday.  Separately, the same group reported that unidentified individuals on Wednesday wrote antisemitic slogans on the side of a home belonging to Jewish family in the eastern suburb of Noisy le Grand.

The mother of the girl who allegedly was assaulted, identified by BNVCA only as Ness, complained to police recently that a group of classmates of her daughter in the public school which she attends in Paris’ 18th district beat her on multiple occasions, often occurring day after day, only because she is Jewish. After one beating, Ness was brought to hospital with a visible contusion to her stomach and ribcage, the report said, requiring 10 days of recovery.

The child will be transferred to a different school, BNVCA wrote.

According to Francis Kalifat, the president of the CRIF federation of Jewish communities of France, antisemitic harassment has made public schools unsafe for Jews, leading to a sharp drop in the number of Jews attending them. In the past, a third of Jewish parents enrolled their children to public schools but now “no one does it,” he told JTA last year.

In the incident involving antisemitic graffiti, BNVCA said it was part of a campaign of intimidation against the family that owns the building targeted.

This time, they wrote “screw the shitty Jews, death to Jews, long live Palestine.” In recent years, the same family found in their mailbox an envelope featuring the words “Allah hu akbar” – Arabic for Allah is the greatest — with 9-milimeter bullets inside. They later received another envelope with a bullet for an AK-47 assault rifle and the words: “The next one is for you.”

The family is afraid to live in their home, wrote BNVCA, which complained to police about the incidents committed against the family and called on authorities to apprehend the culprits….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Polish President: “Forcing migrants on nations will mean the end of the EU”

France: Le Pen calls for anti-terror law that “truly combats the Islamist ideology that has planned our enslavement”

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image is of a man wearing a skullcap looking on as people take part in a demonstration called by the Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France (CRIF) on July 31, 2014 in front of Lyon’s synagogue, as France is considering disbanding a radical Jewish group, the Jewish Defence League (LDJ), whose members clashed with pro-Palestinian activists during rallies over Israel’s offensive in Gaza. The rally is in response to weeks of pro-Palestinian protests marred by clashes, arrests and allegations of anti-Semitism in which synagogues were targeted and Israeli flags burnt. AFP PHOTO / ROMAIN LAFABREGUE

Francis: The Pope of Islam

Pope Francis welcomes to the Vatican the head of a Muslim group tied to the financing of jihad terror. My latest in FrontPage:

As if he weren’t already committed enough to foolish false charity and willful ignorance regarding the jihad threat, Pope Francis on Wednesday met in the Vatican with Dr. Muhammad bin Abdul Karim Al-Issa, the secretary general of the Muslim World League (MWL), a group that has been linked to the financing of jihad terror.

During the meeting, al-Issa thanked the Pope for his “fair positions” on what he called the “false claims that link extremism and violence to Islam.” In other words, he thanked the Pope for dissembling about the motivating ideology of jihad terror, which his group has been accused of financing, and for defaming other religions in an effort to whitewash Islam.

I don’t object to the Pope’s meeting this man. After all, Jesus was a friend of tax collectors and sinners. But the meeting appears to have been a pointless feelgood session, probably featuring some sly dawah from al-Issa. According to Breitbart News, “the two men reportedly exchanged views on a number of ‘issues of common interest’ including peace and global harmony, and discussed cooperation on issues of peaceful coexistence and the spread of love.”

The spread of love. Yes, that’s what the Muslim World League is all about.

Nor is this the first time a Muslim leader has thanked the Pope for being so very useful. Last July, Ahmed al-Tayeb, the Grand Imam of Cairo’s al-Azhar, thanked him for his “defense of Islam against the accusation of violence and terrorism.”

Has any other Pope of Rome in the history of Christianity ever been heralded as a “defender of Islam”?

Of course not. But the Catholic Church has come a long way since the days of Pope Callixtus III, who vowed in 1455 to “exalt the true Faith, and to extirpate the diabolical sect of the reprobate and faithless Mahomet in the East.”

If time travel could be arranged and Pope Francis could run into Callixtus III, Callixtus could “expect a punch,” for Francis is not just a defender of Islam, but a defender of the Sharia death penalty for blasphemy: after Islamic jihadists murdered the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists who had drawn Muhammad, Francis obliquely justified the murders by saying that “it is true that you must not react violently, but although we are good friends if [an aide] says a curse word against my mother, he can expect a punch, it’s normal. You can’t make a toy out of the religions of others. These people provoke and then (something can happen). In freedom of expression there are limits.”

So for the Pope, murdering people for violating Sharia blasphemy laws is “normal,” and it isn’t terrorism for “Christian terrorism does not exist, Jewish terrorism does not exist, and Muslim terrorism does not exist. They do not exist,” he said in a speech last February. “There are fundamentalist and violent individuals in all peoples and religions—and with intolerant generalizations they become stronger because they feed on hate and xenophobia.”

So there is no Islamic terrorism, but if you engage in “intolerant generalizations,” you can “expect a punch.” The Pope, like the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, apparently thinks that the problem is not jihad terror, but non-Muslims talking about jihad terror; Muslims would be peaceful if non-Muslims would simply censor themselves and self-impose Sharia blasphemy restrictions regarding criticism of Islam.

For Pope Francis has no patience with those who discuss such matters: “I don’t like to talk about Islamic violence, because every day, when I read the newspaper, I see violence.” He said, according to Crux, that “when he reads the newspaper, he reads about an Italian who kills his fiancé or his mother in law.” The pontiff added: “They are baptized Catholics. They are violent Catholics.” He said that if he spoke about “Islamic violence,” then he would have to speak about “Catholic violence” as well.

That comparison made no sense, for Italian Catholics who killed their fiancés or mothers in law were not acting in accord with the teachings of their religion, while the Qur’an and Islamic teaching contain numerous exhortations to violence.

But Pope Francis, defender of Islam, cannot concern himself with such minutiae. Nor does he appear to be particularly concerned about the fact that all his false statements about the motivating ideology behind the massive Muslim persecution of Christians over the last few years only enables and abets that persecution, for if that ideology is not identified and confronted, it will continue to flourish.

The Pope of Rome, whom Catholics consider to be the earthly head of the Church, should be a defender of Christianity, not a defender of Islam, the religion that has been at war with Christianity and Judeo-Christian civilization since its earliest days. That any Christian leader would be called a “defender of Islam” by anyone only casts into vivid relief the absurdity of our age and the weakness of the free world. The creeping idolatry of the papacy that is rampant in today’s Catholic Church, with all too many Catholics treating every word of the Pontiff as if it were a divine oracle, only makes matters worse.

Can you imagine any Muslim leader ever being called a “defender of Christianity”? Of course not: Muslim leaders are more aware than their fond defender in the Vatican that Islam mandates warfare against unbelievers, not defense of their theological views.

Pope Francis is not only disastrously wrongheaded about an obvious fact that is reinforced by every day’s headlines; he is also deceiving and misleading his people about a matter of utmost importance, and keeping them ignorant and complacent about a growing and advancing threat.

“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Filial Correction’ to Pope Francis for ‘Propagating Heresy’

EU-funded exhibit “Islam, It’s Also Our History!” opens after delay caused by jihad massacres

Oklahoma Muslim who beheaded female coworker says Qur’an commands beheading

He says also that he has no remorse for his actions, and will attain Paradise. Cleveland County District Attorney Greg Mashburn, meanwhile, says that Nolen “didn’t know the difference between right and wrong, and (he) didn’t know the consequences of his actions.”

Nonsense. He knows very well the difference between right and wrong. The Qur’an says “When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks” (47:4), and as far as he is concerned, that is right, and he knows that as a consequence of his actions, he will go to Paradise. Mashburn is saying that standard Islamic belief is tantamount to insanity. Does he have any idea of how “Islamophobic” he is being?

“‘I Beheaded The First Woman’ – Alton Nolen Interviews Played In Trial,” by Tiffany Liou, News 9, September 20, 2017:

NORMAN, Oklahoma – Throughout the trial, defendant Alton Nolen has been sitting in the court room with his eyes closed and his hands covering his ears. But today, the jurors heard two interviews where Nolen was attentive and responsive.

The interviews were conducted by Moore police detectives and FBI agents. One was done the day after the beheading incident at Vaughan Foods in Moore. The other was done two days later with the same officers. They spoke to the suspect at the hospital.

During the first interview, Nolen admitted to the crime on both victims, Colleen Hufford and Traci Johnson. They asked him about stabbing Johnson and he responded, “That was right after I beheaded the first woman.”

Nolen said in the interview that the Quran taught him that anyone who oppressed him should be beheaded, and he talked a lot about his own interpretation of the Muslim religion.

When asked if he felt remorse or regret for his actions, Nolen responded “no”. He said he would go to heaven….

Then on Monday, the defense will make their case. The defense is asking the jury to find Nolen not guilty by reason of insanity.

After court, Mashburn said, “It’s all in the context of what legally insane means. And that is (Nolen) didn’t know the difference between right and wrong, and (he) didn’t know the consequences of his actions. And clearly he knew what he did was wrong.”…

RELATED ARTICLE: EU-funded exhibit “Islam, It’s Also Our History!” opens after delay caused by jihad massacres

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image is of murder defendant Alton Nolen is led from the courtroom following the jury selection phase of his trial on Thursday, Sept. 14, 2017 in Oklahoma City, Okla. Nolen is on trial for the beheading of Colleen Hufford at Vaughan Foods food processing plant in Moore. Photo by Steve Sisney, The Oklahoman

90% of asylum seekers end up on welfare

Surprised? Don’t be. Thought that the Muslim migrants were coming to Europe to serve as a work force for the aging population? Don’t be naive. Non-Muslims paying for the upkeep of Muslims is a Qur’anic dictate:

“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).

The caliph Umar said the jizya payments from the dhimmis were the source of the Muslims’ livelihood:

“Narrated Juwairiya bin Qudama at-Tamimi: We said to `Umar bin Al-Khattab, ‘O Chief of the believers! Advise us.’ He said, ‘I advise you to fulfill Allah’s Convention (made with the Dhimmis) as it is the convention of your Prophet and the source of the livelihood of your dependents (i.e. the taxes from the Dhimmis.)’” (Bukhari 4.53.388)

Anjem Choudary said in February 2013:

“We are on Jihad Seekers Allowance, We take the Jizya (protection money paid to Muslims by non-Muslims) which is ours anyway. The normal situation is to take money from the Kafir (non-Muslim), isn’t it? So this is normal situation. They give us the money. You work, give us the money. Allah Akbar, we take the money. Hopefully there is no one from the DSS (Department of Social Security) listening. Ah, but you see people will say you are not working. But the normal situation is for you to take money from the Kuffar (non-Muslim) So we take Jihad Seeker’s Allowance.”

“90 Per Cent Of Asylum Seekers In Austria End Up On Welfare,” by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, September 16, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Austrian Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka is resisting EU efforts to increase his country’s migrant quota, claiming that 90 per cent of asylum seekers in Austria end up on welfare benefits and strain the system.

The Austrian Interior Minister once again railed at attempts by the European Union to send more migrants to Austria, saying that the vast majority end up claiming benefits, Kronen Zeitung reports.Sobotka says “Austria has borne the main load from 2014 to 2017. Our system is simply overwhelmed,”

Sobotka says “Austria has borne the main load from 2014 to 2017,” and “Our system is simply overwhelmed”.

He added: “If you look at the asylum seekers, you can see that 90 percent are migrating to the needs-oriented minimum security system,” and said it was still of great importance to maintain border security.

“We had up to 15,000 refugees per day on some days, today it is an average of 30.

“It is important to keep the pressure on those who bring migrants illegally to Europe via the Mediterranean and in other ways.” he added saying that if the European Union fails to keep up the pressure it will be a sign for people smugglers who will double their efforts to smuggle more migrants into Europe.

He warned that if the European Union fails to keep up the pressure it will send a signal to people-smugglers, who will double their efforts to bring more migrants into Europe.

“They tell them that they can quietly live their religion here and that Austria will soon be theirs.” https://t.co/CUuj61BDpi

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) August 11, 2017

The EU’s migrant redistribution plan has been controversial in many countries, and some like Hungary and Poland have rejected the plan entirely. Hungary held a referendum on the issue last year in which the vast majority of Hungarians voted to reject the proposal as well.

Hungary and Slovakia made an appeal to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) claiming that the distribution agreement was invalid as it did not have unanimous consent from member states and their citizens.

The ECJ rejected the appeal last week, but both Hungary and Poland have maintained that they will still refuse to take in migrants.

Austria Sends Soldiers to Migrant Gateway Where Alt-Left Attacked Policehttps://t.co/ppyJfboJuk

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) August 18, 2017

It was also revealed this week that foreign-born mothers are drastically overrepresented among those who claim child care allowance in Austria, with one-third of all claimants coming from foreign backgrounds.

In the capital of Vienna, foreign-background families account for 55 per cent of claimants, costing taxpayers millions of euros….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Zanzibar: “We rounded them up because we suspect they were engaged in homosexuality”

London subway jihad bomber held by police two weeks ago but freed

Muslim who slaughtered British soldier demands $132,000 for being ‘mentally scarred’ in prison

We see this again and again: no matter what they have done, Muslims are the victims. Islamic jihadists and supremacists eagerly take up the victim role, without the slightest indication of shame at doing so. And the establishment media abets them in this, by consistently framing jihad massacres as if their primary victims were Muslims who now fear a “backlash” that rarely, if ever, materializes.

Michael Adebolajo

“‘Blood money’: Lee Rigby’s mother blasts her son’s murderer as he chases £100,000 from taxpayers over claims jail injury left him mentally scarred,” by Anthony Joseph, MailOnline, September 8, 2017:

Lee Rigby’s murderer wants £100,000 ‘blood money’ over allegations that prison officers left him mentally scarred.

Michael Adebolajo, 32, who murdered the fusilier Mr Rigby, 25, in Woolwich, south east London, in 2013, lost his two front teeth when prison staff tried to restrain him four years ago.

He has now officially launched a court writ in which he claims he was left with a ‘psychiatric injury’.

And Mr Rigby’s mother, Lyn, 50, hit out at her son’s killer and said he deserves to ‘die in jail’.

Adebolajo, wants £25,000 in compensation after claiming to ‘suffer distress, loss and damage’ on remand at London’s top-security Belmarsh jail.

But he has been fighting the battle for two years and it could cost the taxpayer a further £75,000 in police and legal costs.

The writ has now been officially passed on to the High Court in London.

It claims that while Adebolajo, who killed Mr Rigby with Michael Adebowale, 26, was being escorted back to his cell after a phone call he dropped his hands from his head and spun round to confront officers.

He warned staff to ‘watch themselves’ and asked ‘Allah to strike down his oppressors’.

The killer claims he was ‘verbally abused’ before he was smashed into bars of his cell windows.

He also claimed officers twisted his left arm and that he was ‘stamped on’ in an ‘unreasonable, unjustified and excessive’ assault.

The Crown Prosecution Service ruled out action against the five prison officers after a police investigation.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman told The Sun: ‘The public will be rightly outraged at the thought of this offender claiming compensation from the taxpayer.’…

RELATED ARTICLES:

SPLC “discredited, left-wing organization that seeks to silence its opponents with ‘hate group’ label”

Germany: Veiled Muslima assaults shopkeeper for selling lingerie near Islamic headscarves

Lee Rigby’s evil killer ‘radicalising inmates’ at Frankland Prison

Linda Sarsour says her hijab transformed her from ‘white’ into a ‘person of color’

Elder of Ziyon has made the most amazing discovery: Linda Sarsour “magically changed from white to a ‘woman of color’ in an instant,” just by putting on a hijab.

Sarsour says in the above video: “When I wasn’t wearing hijab I was just some ordinary white girl from New York City.” That comes from a Vox video published in January 2017.

But in an April 2017 interview, there is this:

After watching Michelle Pfeiffer’s character in Dangerous Minds, Sarsour decided to become a high school teacher, “inspiring young people of color like me, to show them their potential.” She graduated a year early, gave birth to her eldest son, and enrolled in community college.

I’ve often argued against the idea that opposition to jihad terror is “racist” by pointing out the Islam is not a race, and that converts to Islam don’t change their race when they change their religion. But now I see how it works, courtesy of Linda Sarsour: conversion to Islam, or at least devout observance of Islam, really does change one’s race! It’s magic! Sarsour should help a sister out and call Rachel Dolezal to tell her that all she has to do in order to become a member of her preferred race is don a hijab.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Myanmar: Muslims murder dozens of Hindus

UK Police Are Investigating My Group for “Hate Crime” for Posters Warning of Grooming Gangs

Brooklyn Muslim: ‘Then we will go to FBI headquarters, kill the FBI people’

Apparently Akhror Saidakhmetov didn’t get the memo on how the FBI steadfastly refuses to acknowledge the motivating ideology behind the jihad threat, falsely claims that “right-wing extremists” are as much or more of a violent threat than jihadis, and apparently tried to get foes of jihad terror and Sharia oppression murdered. If he had known all that, he might have had a better sense of who his friends were.

Akhror Saidakhmetov

Akhror Saidakhmetov is a resident of Brooklyn.

“Man arrested in Villa Park, charged with fundraising for ISIS fighters,” by Jason Meisner, Chicago Tribune, September 1, 2017:

A 31-year-old truck driver living in west suburban Villa Park was arrested by the FBI on Thursday on charges out of New York that alleged he raised money in 2015 to help send fighters from the U.S. to ISIS fronts in Syria.

At a hearing in federal court in Chicago, prosecutors asked that Dilshod Khusanov, a native of Uzbekistan, be detained as a flight risk and danger to the community.

He would then be taken to Brooklyn to face the two-count indictment charging him with conspiring and attempting to provide material support to the Islamic State and a second terrorist organization, al-Nusrah Front. Each count carries a maximum of 15 years in prison if convicted….

According to a release from the U.S. attorney’s office in Brooklyn, Khusanov was part of a cell of “like-minded individuals” seeking to aid ISIS and al-Nusrah Front in Syria.

Four other members of the support group, as well as two people who allegedly tried to travel to Syria to join ISIS fighters, have already pleaded guilty to their roles in the conspiracy, according to prosecutors.

The investigation began when one of Khusanov’s co-conspirators, Abdurasul Juraboev, posted on an Uzbek-language website that he wished to martyr himself on U.S. soil, possibly by assassinating then-President Barack Obama, according to prosecutors.

Another co-conspirator, Akhror Saidakhmetov, was arrested in February 2015 at Kennedy International Airport as he attempted to travel to Turkey and then Syria “for the purpose of waging violent jihad on behalf of ISIS,” according to the charges.

Khusanov helped fund those efforts by providing his own money and promising to raise other funds to help pay Saidakhmetov’s travel expenses, prosecutors alleged….

In one conversation from November 2014, Saidakhmetov talked about joining the U.S. military as an ISIS spy, according to a criminal complaint. When Juraboev criticized that plan, Saidakhmetov responded he could always just “open fire on American soldiers and kill as many of them as possible,” the complaint alleged.

Two months later, Saidakhmetov was recorded by an FBI informant talking about another plan to secure an automatic weapon and shoot a police officer, the complaint alleged.

“Boom … then we will take his gun, bullets and a bulletproof vest (and) do the same with a couple of others,” Saidakhmetov allegedly said. “Then we will go to FBI headquarters, kill the FBI people.”

RELATED ARTICLES:

UK: Muslims condemn as “Islamophobic” posters warning about Muslim rape gangs

Indiana: Taxpayer-funded Ball State University gives academic credit to students for meeting Muslims

VIDEO: British TV promotes a violent, racist, religious extremist Muslim woman

How marvelous the new multicultural Britain is. And just imagine what it will look like in five years.

“Anti-White Islamist Gets Promoted As ‘Muslim Woman Fighting Stereotypes’ On UK TV,” by Ian Miles Cheong, Daily Caller, August 28, 2017:

UK’s Channel 4 produced a short documentary last week celebrating a woman with a history of posting violent, racist, and religious extremist rhetoric online as an example of a “Muslim woman fighting back by rejecting stereotypes.”

Nadia Chan, a self-described “anti-colonialist Islamist” described Jews as “parasites” and called for violent militancy against the British government and white people. She has also called on Muslims to support “armed resistance from the Islamic Jihad […] and also Hamas,” on Islamic state TV.

Chan’s tweets ranged from hostility against whites and Jewish people, quotes by Robert Mugabe, and calls for violence against the police. She even advocated support for North Korea, Venezuela’s undemocratic socialist government, and the Castro regime in Cuba.

“The only white man you can trust is a dead white man,” she wrote, quoting Mugabe.

“We need straight up militancy, they trying to kill us and they’re getting brave. These honkies will kill more unless they are stopped,” she wrote.

In an anti-Jewish tweet, Chan called for the destruction of the “parasitic entity known as ‘Israel’.” “Furthermore, every single Israel is a parasite,” she added.

She expressed ceaseless hatred against white people, describing them as “parasites” and “cave people” in various tweets.

Nadia Chan also advocated her belief that Europeans were “given” the invention of soap by Muslims. “Actually Muslims (90% Pakistan is Muslim) clean themselves 5 times a day, unlike u dirty white cave parasites, muslims gave y’all soap remember.”…

RELATED ARTICLES:

Barcelona jihad murderer began praying more before his attack

Germany: Police investigate after anti-mass migration party gives out pepper spray to women

First Survey of Muslims In France Reveals Love for Sharia [Islamic] Law and Bin Laden

Dateline, Paris, France 2016: There is a reputable think tank in France called “Institut Montaigne.” The Institut Montaigne is a French think tank founded by Claude Bébéar in 2000 (he is a successful French businessman – a Warren Buffet of France. He is the founder and former CEO of AXA, a global financial services giant based in Paris). The Institut Montaigne was founded with the aim to promote both competitiveness and social cohesion and to help shape public policy to improve both economic and social environment in France. In translation – this means that the entrenched parasitical interests of profit and money wish to pacify French patriotism in order to allow the world to run over the nation of France in the interests of worldwide economic profit. The true capitalists of the West (masters of the democracy of the stock-exchange) have long ago betrayed the national interests of the countries in which they began. Still, Institut Montaigne is not as bad as it could be. It leans conservative, even though it is on the fence about many important issues on which the Left must be opposed because they lead to the ultimate suicide of France and the West. It almost broke a taboo in conducting a survey of Muslims. So this think tank produced recently an important survey of the French Muslims in which some startling findings were presentedChief among them is the preference for Shariah Law over any other among a full third of the French Muslims – and that Bin Laden’s Islam of no compromise is craved by a half of young French Muslims! The secular education system fit for spiritless materialists has failed! The emperor has no clothes! French culture, French literature, French history and the biographies of prominent men of French history – absolutely DO NOT inspire the immigrant Muslims in France – but ISIS and the Islamic culture of violence does!?

Benoit Rayski wrote a cynical assessment of the Institut Montaigne survey on Muslim attitudes and preferences because the reality of the situation forced him into the cynical corner. The cowardly LEFT misrepresents survey results to make the public drugged by lies into the sleepiness of the oblivion in which the West will perish unless an awakening is made to happen somehow. Rayski is a historian, a somewhat conservative writer, and journalist, one of a few Frenchmen with public access that are unafraid to speak up.

Of course, we would be reasonable to assume that those Muslims who responded to the survey better or more favorably to France’s interests are not clearly separated from their brethren that are openly supporting the radical Islam sentiment. A sizeable chunk of them could be considered as leaning radical, at the end of the day – just as their sympathies lie against Israel, which is always a solid litmus test of bottom-line Islamic attitudes.

How can France survive as a nation? Bear in mind that nations are NOT economic units (contrary to what the Left will falsely make you believe) but political, cultural and ultimately – spiritual entities or unities emerging from the depths of political history! No economics can ever create a nation! So, economic immigration is a death-knell for every Western nation. It is a sign of an inorganic state of the West, because economics by themselves cannot be in the interest of any nation, just as people need food but don’t live just to eat!That is what history proper teaches us. How can we make the Left understand its errors? Are surveys enough? Of course, no….

MUSLIMS OF FRANCE: THE SURVEY THAT SURPRISES? NO, THE SURVEY IS SCARY!

Often, just as it is in the case of gifts, everything is a matter of packaging. The gift papers are, according to the designers who designed them, more or less pretty. And there – this is the Journal du Dimanche – which presented a terrible survey in packaging that has been treated so that the appearance is full of charm. But inside, it’s all but a gift …

In the “one” of the newspaper, this title appeared as a result of the published survey: “Muslims of France, the inquiry that surprises”. And we rush – a surprise, it’s always tempting – to see. The investigation for the survey, thorough and meticulous, was carried out by Ifop for the Institut Montaigne.

And, in a first impulse, we let ourselves be taken in by the packaging. The figures that are highlighted give off the sweet and soothing fragrance of the roses of our gardens. Coeducation ? “Do you agree to go to a mixed pool?” Answer: 75% yes in men, 56% in women. It’s good, no? “Are you in favor of wearing the full veil?” Answer: 65% not in men, 61% in women. It’s not too bad, right?

But we have the temptation – diabolical, not to say Islamophobic – to tear the wrapper in order to savor indiscriminately what is inside. The same figures quoted above say that 25% of men and 39% of women refuse to go to a mixed swimming pool! It’s worse, isn’t it? They also say, in these figures, that 20% of men and 39% of women agree on the full veil! That too is more or less good, isn’t it?

We continue ? Yes, and it will be even better. 29% of the Muslims and Muslims surveyed say that the Sharia is more important than the law of the Republic! Yes, 29%, that is to say a third of the population who declare themselves Muslim … This figure is not worrying: it is appalling. And to add to this – a [Muslim] declaration of war on France, for it is specified in the survey that this devouring passion for a rigorous, fundamentalist Islam is overrepresented among young Muslims: 50% of the under 25 years fervently advocate it!

I’m sorry to have to remove the veil (no pun intended) which is the subject of this survey’s investigation … Sorry also to say that, alas, there is nothing, strictly nothing, surprising in this survey. We all know, and for a long time, what is the status of Islam in France. It was subdued and seething: the figures, naked and cruel, prove it. So much the worse for the obtuse and blind supporters of the “no amalgam Islam”, the so-called religion of peace and love.

It is true that the expert of the Institut Montaigne who comments on these damning results tries to relativize them with a new concept. For him, we must just see the consequence of a breath of revolt which he calls “Islamic pride” (very naive). A bit like the “gay pride” that allowed homosexuals to show themselves and assert themselves. Do not stop here. Will we see one day a “catholic pride”, a “jew pride”, a “french pride”? And why not a “corsica pride”? Ah! But that’s already done.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.