Franciscan Monk Explains: ‘Islam Is Worse Evil Than Nazism’

Dateline, 2015-2017, Zagreb, Croatia: In order to understand where Father Daniel Maljur (Malyoor) with his statements in the article below (which shocked the Left in Croatia) is coming from we need to understand the volatile situation such as it existed for centuries on the porous eastern borders of Croatia. History tells us there was no tactic of terror that the Muslims did not exploit.

“As the first glow of dawn were appearing on the horizon of this cold winter day, you could hear the loud crackle and sparkle of the burning fires consuming the homes of the villagers who used to live in this section of the wide and treacherous border between this brave little European kingdom of Medieval Croatia and the new Bosnian province of the Turkish Empire.

All the houses were burning while the fleeing dogs barked wildly all around. The bearded horsemen who conducted this raid and caught the sleeping villagers by surprise at dawn were just evacuating the place after an orgy of plunder and slaughter, panting from excitement while on horseback with a saber and a spear in hand, wearing smelly cotton tunics covering their scrawny bodies. They just started escorting the oxen-hauled heavy wagon train moving the stolen property belonging to the villagers.

Then, one of these monsters galloped over to the head of the convoy of massive ox carts hauling away stolen goods still smeared with the blood of their slaughtered Christian owners, and shouted: Master, what shall we do with them?!?! – and pointed at the nearby animal farm pen in which there shuddered these barefoot children shivering in torn clothes while their old grandmothers who took them there hoping to avoid the wrath of Muslims were hugging these boys and girls, their young gasping eyes wide open and rolling in terror at the commotion around them.

SHIMDI HEPSINI OELDYR! (KILL THEM ALL NOW!) was the angry and coarse shouted response that everyone heard from the greasy snout of this big and hairy dude with a black turban on his square head sporting several special curved sabers dripping with blood (known as “scimitars” favored by the Turks who used to be the masters of quick hit-and-run steppe warfare). Right after screaming this order, as if to justify his sociopathic order, this swarthy and thick-set commander of the party of Muslim raiders murmured: “these are the Caour bastards anyway, what difference does it make to Allah?” (using a resonant ancient racial slur [Caour] employed by Muslims against the white people of the European races of Man). Then, as if to fulfill the order, the corral or pen in which the children of the liquidated village stood was overrun by horsemen of the raiding party.

The order was done. The squadron of Albanian horsemen galloped in, jumped the little fence and grounded up the Christian children inside who squirmed and shrieked under the heavy horseshoes of their muscular horses, blood, mud, torn hair, and crushed bone all mixed in. “Now they will never grow up to fight us!” blathered some of the gleeful horsemen. Those of the stomped children that were half-killed and still screaming were left to die in agony after hours of pain as the fires of their burning village were dying down.” – this is a veritable illustration based on many eyewitness accounts gathered over the centuries of border warfare between the Muslim Empire and the hapless subjects of the European kingdoms.

This began after the fall of Serbia and the conquest of Constantinople, in the 15th century. The new Turkish tactic of border terrorism was introduced with the twofold aim of satisfying the local allies of the Muslim Empire who would be enriched and rewarded by the state-sanctioned and even by the religion of Islam-sanctioned border skirmish warfare involving plunder, mayhem and pure destruction of property and lives of the Medieval Europeans, and also – of terrorizing the Christian states of Europe in order to discourage them from opposition.

After the Battle of Kosovo in 1389 (which was the most important and the most fateful single battle against the Turkish Muslims before they took over the lower third of eastern Europe) which was a battle that meant more than just the destruction of the Serbian kingdom for it opened the floodgates of armed and lustful Muslims onto Europe, putting immediate pressure on the new border states of Croatia with Dalmatia, Hungary and Romania. The way that the new Muslim empire (emboldened by the capture of the Christian headquarters of the old city of Constantinople in 1453) chose to act vis-a-vis Europe was to keep chipping away at the borders of the exposed kingdoms, create volatile border regions, expand the no-man’s zone between the farthest Muslim outpost (in western Bosnia, southern Hungary and southern Romania) and the nearest free Christian settlements in these countries. The hope was that the constant headache of having Turks on the border would push these states into submitting to the Muslim Empire and becoming its new provinces or vassals. At the same time, Istanbul pursued a diplomatic policy of ‘divide and conquer’ with the idea of facing the Europeans one-by-one, taking down each European country one at a time, left alone and without any allies, just like the fallen Serbia in 1389. The Ottoman Turkish policy was to prevent alliances between the European kingdoms so that Muslims would never face a united front against them in Europe.

Meanwhile, out in the Balkans, there were plenty of volunteers for the dirty work of the novel Muslim sport of border-raiding (which would save the Turks the cost of having to deploy the regular army and its crack troops for such unseemly activity). In fact, there was a coterie of provincial allies of the Turkish overlord (Sultan) in Istanbul (formerly known as Constantinople) among whom were all kinds of opportunistic plunderers and born ambush predators such as the vicious Albanian shepherds, wild Wallachian/Romanian converts to Islam, Bosnian Bogumils (which was a kind of Muslim sect in the Balkans before the Muslim Turks ever arrived) eager to prove their loyalty to the new masters, and various scary dogs of war known as the “Bashibozouks” (masters of irregular warfare in the wilderness) all gathered from every race and every gang known to the late Medieval times, among whom were sometimes even the irredeemable Christian renegades from the conquered lands of Europe. Whenever they could help it, the Turks enjoyed seeing Christians kill Christians for the sake of the Muslim interest, so they would often look to bribe or offer promises to disaffected Christians in the borderlands in order to dupe them into siding with the Turks against their fellow Europeans. The Sultan could order the cessation of border raids in order to incentivize the country to do the Turkish bidding. And if not – then the internally displaced refugees caused by Turkish raids would put pressure on the Christian leadership to listen to the Sultan.

Typically, on any given year in the 15th, 16th, 17th, and 18th century, the Turks (among whom there were sometimes even Kurds, Berbers, Moors, and Arabs) and their local Balkan allies would undertake ten major border invasion/raids a year into Croatia, Austria, Hungary and Romania using these cost-free irregular fighters deploying the tactic of destroying the attacked border areas and even the adjacent interior areas as far as the lower Austria! After Hungary fell to the Turks, Czechia, Slovakia, and Poland became the new targets. Typically, the Turks brought fire and brimstone to the Europeans; they would burn all the buildings in a settlement, slaughter all the people who were not economically viable (sometimes, if they had the time and expertise, impaling at the stakes a few) including the old and the helpless, and would take everyone else as slave (many enslaved or kidnapped pretty white Christian European women and boys died from merciless rapes in the camps of the Muslims on the Turkish side of the border). After all, Islam is the culture of rape.

An old and famous Croatian poet, Ivan Mazuranic [Mazhooranich], who was himself a witness to Turkish raids into the Croatian hinterland, once recorded in his celebrated verse the cold and merciless ruling Turkish logic at work [the word “rayah” is another Turkish slur, this one used to condescendingly describe a mindless mob of poor tax-paying people, usually Christian]:

“And what for the rayah? 

For them only the dry bread

Which they can moist with their tears.”

CROATIAN FRANCISCAN SHOCKS THE PUBLIC: ISLAM IS WORSE THAN NAZISM

The Vicar of St Nicholas Parish in Croatian city of Kostajnica, Franciscan monk Danijel Maljur, caused great sensation because in a short Youtube film named “Islam”  he explained why this religion of Islam is the greatest evil that mankind has ever suffered!

Maljur talks about Nazism, the Holocaust, Hitler, the atomic bomb in Japan, abortion. But, according to his interpretation, all this is nothing compared to Islam.

“Islam, who is entering our doorsteps through the back door, is without any doubt surpassing all the tragedies of mankind,” says Fr. Maljur, explaining further that the holy book of Islam, the Qur’an, as not an authentic work, and certainly not God’s revelation or the Word of God.

He also published his explanation on his public profile on Facebook [h[https://www.facebook.com/danijel.maljur]�He put in a link leading to the article which he calls ‘Islam in Statistics’ in which the author claims that Islam is a violent religion that destroys the world. This publication, Brother Maljur, accompanied with the text: “One of our bishops said yesterday that we all believe in the same God. Nope, not gonna happen … ‘.

On the same profile on September 18th, he stated that he was in Tovarnik in 2015 among the Muslim refugees. He claims that there are almost no old men, women and children among them, but there are so many prevailing young men in their prime of life averaging about 35 years of age.

“If you expect to see freedom-loving rebels [f[from Syria]you will have to pluck some journalistic footage because there is no such thing in reality. These are the faces of the kings or future rulers over us who have stormed into the European lands of their future slaves where they can lie in wait after having to suffer some temporary settlement hassles. Perhaps among them, there are also real refugees seeking only security in the first free country they can find, but I have not seen such a thing,” he continues.

The video that Danijel Maljur put on youtube is now marked as private and can not be opened, but on the Facebook page of the Defense of Faith and the web portal www.obranavjere.com you can read about the religious convictions of this young Franciscan friar.

Islam without any doubt surpasses all the above-mentioned tragedies of humanity,” says Brother Daniel after he listed all the major tragedies that history had experienced in mankind – from Genghis Khan’s conquests to Nazism. Furthermore, Fr. Daniel believes that Judaism and Christianity derive from the common roots of Abraham, while “the only thing that pulls Islam is dried weeds,” adding that Judaism and Christianity have nothing in common with either Allah or the Quran. According to him, Islam defies the true God, spites all the people, and opposes common sense. For Fr. Daniel, the Quran is an unbelievable book because it was created a long time after Muhammad’s death.

“Not only is the Quran the word of God not revealed, but its devilish inspiration is clear,” Brother Daniel denotes his arguments on the Qur’an. For him, Muhammad is the embodiment of everything bad. “It is alarming that Muhammad is still a model for all Muslims today,”

Furthermore, he believes that Islam is not a peaceful religion. “All those Muslims who are called radical are nothing but normal Muslims, such as they are according to Islamic standards and should be”. “According to some estimates, in the Islamic conquests since its founding 270 million people have been killed,” he expounds.

“There can be no dialogue with Islam,” Daniel says, adding that this is because the nature of Islam is against dialogue.

“We must know that human rights violations are at the core of this ideology,” says the Franciscan.

Thus, in an article entitled “Islam in Statistics,” he says “there are some statistics that show Islam as a violent religion that destroys the whole world.”

On the pages of the Croatian Franciscan Parish of Saints Cyril and Methodius, Fr. Danijel Maljur is described as a Franciscan with an unusual sense of humor, determined in the defense of the faith and ready for the challenges of modern society. Through his YouTube channel, he has been speaking to the general public for some time, and the reason, as he said in an interview on the above-mentioned page, is the fact that the Church has never been attacked in the past as it is being attacked today.

The Turkish Empire At The Height of Its Power and Spread

The Turkish Empire At The Height of Its Power and Spread.

A painting depicting the Turkish raid on a Croatian country parson's home

A painting depicting the Turkish raid on a Croatian country parson’s home.

RELATED ARTICLE: Hrvatski franjevac šokirao javnost: Islam gore zlo od nacizma (VIDEO)

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

“Arabs think what Hitler did was a good thing”

The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).

“At a site of Nazi terror, Muslim refugees reckon with Germany’s past,”

by Isaac Stanley-Becker and Alexandra Rojkov, Washington Post, August 10, 2017:

ORANIENBURG, Germany — He walked across the bleak expanse of what was once the Sachsenhausen concentration camp, toward the gas chamber that had been stocked with liquid Zyklon B, and posed the question that still strains the conscience of modern German society.

“How was it possible?” Osman Jamo asked.

Yet he also wondered why the site, where barbed wire and guard towers stood dark against the brilliant sunshine of a summer afternoon in this town north of Berlin, had been preserved at all.

“Maybe the Jews want to keep these places going so they can be seen as victims forever,” he said of Sachsenhausen, which was mainly used for political prisoners but by the beginning of 1945 held 11,100 Jews.

Jamo’s response is not the usual reaction toEurope’s [sic] postwar conversion of concentration camps into memorials and museums, places of atonement and civic education that ask visitors never to forget the Nazi past.

But this was not a typical tour — nor was Jamo a typical visitor. This was an effort to sensitize Muslim migrants to the dark history of the country that today offers them asylum. Two years ago, Jamo, 38, fled to Germany from Kobane, a Syrian city occupied by Islamic State militants in late 2014. His ambivalent response to the suffering of Jews at Sachsenhausen speaks to centuries-old religious strife as well as to the political conflict that has torn the Middle East since Israel’s founding after World War II.

At the same time, the refugee’s views reflect the moral quandaries posed by mass migration for a nation rebuilt after the Holocaust on a set of bedrock principles that includes responsibility to the Jewish people.

“There is an expectation that people coming to Germany will assume that sense of historical duty,” said Fatih Uenal, a German-Turkish political psychologist who is founding a vocational training program for refugees in Frankfurt. “That makes the higher incidence of anti-Semitic views among Muslims hard to talk about, and so we haven’t found a good way of engaging different sorts of people about the violence that went on here.”…

The spectacle of brutality on display at Sachsenhausen did not awe Jamo, a former photographer who had known daily violence in Syria. No matter the direct perpetrator of the violence Jamo had witnessed, the greatest cause of conflict in the region, he said, was Israel.

“Israeli aggression is the most basic problem,” he said….

The history that binds Germany to Israel is interpreted differently by many in the Arab world, Jamo said: “The Arabs think what Hitler did was a good thing, because he freed them from the Jews.”

He spoke bluntly before a video camera that followed him around the site of the former camp. His remarks will appear in a documentary film about how refugees in Germany understand the mass murder of Jews.

Jamo was one of only two refugees involved in R.future-TV who agreed to participate in the film project on Holocaust history. Germany’s treatment of Jews has been a difficult topic of debate, said Alkomi, a Christian whose family escaped to Germany from Syria when he was 9. At a meeting of the group last month, one man admitted, “In some ways, we think of the Jews just like the Nazis did.”…

“A lot of Muslim refugees,” said Josef Schuster, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany “grew up in countries where hatred of Jews and of Israel is normal.” Many know little about the Holocaust, he said, “and some even admire Hitler.”…

In Iraq, anti-Semitic influences are pervasive, said Mohammed Kareem, the other refu­gee who had agreed to participate in the film. But Kareem, 34, who had been a police officer in Baghdad, spoke with his back to the camera, worried for his family still in Iraq if he were to be identified as “a friend of the Jews.”

“Everywhere — whether on the TV, from Imams or at school — we hear, ‘Jews are not good,’ and we don’t know any Jews to see them differently,” Kareem said. Since arriving in Germany in 2015, he has encountered several Jews who volunteer at a Berlin church that works with refugees. And now he is asking himself, “‘Why does my country say Jews are not good?’ Their armies — that’s different.”…

“If Germany paid reparations to Israel, then Americans should pay for what they did in Iraq,” Kareem said. By the end of the day, Jamo was firm on one point: “We are definitely still against the Zionists.”…

RELATED ARTICLES:

Switzerland: Imam charged with incitement to murder non-practicing Muslims

Swedish hostage kidnapped by al-Qaeda “pretended to be Muslim” to survive

The Democrat Party: The New Anti-Semitism Party

Warren, Booker, Gillibrand — it’s not them — it’s the party. It’s not possible to be on the left today and support Israel. You have to support the “Palestinian” jihad, and turn a blind eye to the savage murder of innocent civilians, including families eating Shabbat dinner and sleeping in their beds. The Democrats: the New Evil Party.

“Elizabeth Warren Comes Out Against Senate’s Anti-BDS Bill,” by David Colon, Gothamist, August 8, 2017:

As debate continues to rage over the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, and one rumored 2020 presidential candidate distances herself from it, another prominent Democrat and rumored presidential candidate has come out against it as well. Senator Elizabeth Warren announced her opposition to the bill this week, calling it a violation of free speech.

Warren, who was never a sponsor of the bill, was asked about it by a constituent at a town hall last night. In response, she said that while she disagreed with BDS, she also said that “outlawing free speech-protected activity violates our basic constitution.”

The bill is an addition to the Export Act of 1979, which criminalized a company knowingly joining the Arab League boycott of Israel. This addition would update the bill to criminalize US companies from joining on to boycotts of US allies called for by intergovernmental organizations such as the United Nations or the European Union. Violations could be punishable by up to $1 million in fines and 20 years in prison.

Besides Warren, other Democratic Senators are feeling the heat regarding the bill as well. Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon was confronted by constituents this past weekend who questioned why he supported the bill. Wyden argues that the bill simply updates the previous 1979 law targeting the Arab League boycott of Israel, and that no one has been imprisoned for violating that.

While supporters of the law like Wyden and Chuck Schumer claim that the bill doesn’t infringe on free speech, a critic of the bill suggests that it still does, even if it doesn’t punish individuals participating in the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement….

“Democrats Who Want to Be President Back Away from Israel,”

by Jonathan S. Tobin, National Review, August 7, 2017:

The shift to the left by Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York demonstrates the power of a party base that is abandoning the Jewish state.

Both were once rock-solid supporters of Israel. But both have other priorities these days — they are thinking about running for president in 2020. Their problem is that no one who plans to compete in future Democratic primaries can ignore the growing power of their party’s left wing, which has grown increasingly hostile to Israel.

The influence of the far left is the only thing that might explain why Booker and Gillibrand are presenting themselves to their party’s base as less than fully supportive of Israel. The context for this development is a sea change in the Democratic party that has been taking shape over the past two decades. Where once the Democrats were the lockstep pro-Israel party and Republicans were divided about backing Israel, the parties’ positions are now reversed. Republicans today are nearly unanimous in their enthusiastic support for the Jewish state, and they oppose all measures that endanger its security. Now it is the Democrats who are split, with polls showing that those who identify with the party are far less likely to back Israel than Republicans are.

The left-wing grass roots of the Democratic party are increasingly hostile to Israel, something that became clear in 2012 when the delegates at the Democratic National Convention revolted against their leadership’s efforts to include in the party platform a recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. The delegates booed loudly and rejected the measure in a voice vote while the convention chairman ignored the crowd and declared that the measure had passed. The spectacle was a benchmark moment.

Congressional Democrats also demonstrated the limits of their sympathy for Israel during the debate over the Iran nuclear deal. When President Obama declared that support for the agreement was a litmus test of party loyalty, few Democrats bucked him. Both Gillibrand and Booker supported the deal’s ratification by the backhanded method the administration employed rather than by gaining the support of two-thirds of the Senate – which the Constitution requires for treaties.

In 2016, Democrats growing split over Israel was evident in the Clinton and Sanders campaigns. The candidates disagreed over Israel’s right of self-defense and over support for Palestinian ambitions — one of the few areas where they differed substantively. The Clinton forces were able to quash any potential revolt over the issue, but the presence on the platform committee of Sanders delegates such as Representative Keith Ellison and Cornel West — prominent supporters of anti-Israel measures — was a harbinger of the growing animosity toward Israel….

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Christian to be deported to Iran, told ‘it’s your problem you decided to become a Christian’

“An Iranian actress, who moved to Sweden after her conversion from Islam to Christianity” is being deported back to Iran.

Shame on Sweden. The country is already under siege from Islamic supremacists and jihadists because of its suicidal immigration policy. 80 percent of its police force wants to quit because of its dangerous work. Violent no go zones have expanded to include a mall and respectable business districts. The country is the rape capital of Europe. It has been deemed on the verge of civil war. But instead of deporting the real troublemakers, Sweden is turning its back on Aideen Strandsson, who possibly faces death for apostasy at the hands of Iranian regime if she is sent back.

Rather than receive from Swedish authorities the slightest sympathy and humanitarian assistance, Strandsson says she was told:

“It’s not our problem if you decided to become a Christian” even if the refusal of asylum results in rape, torture or death.

Aideen Strandsson

Oddly, Sweden has a reputation as “the world’s humanitarian conscience and a safe haven for refugees.” Sweden would apparently prefer to see its country continue to be decimated by the wrong kind of asylum seekers than extend a helping hand to this innocent Christian lady.

“Sweden Tells Iranian Christian Woman Fearing Deportation It’s Her ‘Problem She Decided to Become Christian’”,

by Anugrah Kumar , Christian Post, August 7, 2017:

An Iranian actress, who moved to Sweden after her conversion from Islam to Christianity following a vision of Jesus in her dream, is now facing deportation and has been told by Swedish authorities “it’s not our problem if you decided to become a Christian” even if the refusal of asylum results in rape, torture or death.

“They said to me it’s your personal life and it’s not our problem if you decided to become a Christian, and it’s your problem,” Christian Broadcasting Network quoted Aideen Strandsson as saying.

Strandsson traveled to Sweden in 2014 on a work visa, and has twice been denied asylum in that country. “It is really dangerous for me and I don’t know why immigration doesn’t believe that,” she said. “I’m really in danger.”

However, Swedish authorities do not seem to care. “Her case has been appealed and processed by the Migration Agency and thereafter by the Swedish courts, which have also decided that she cannot be granted asylum,” Swedish migration board official Ulrika Langels told CBN.

Swedish attorney Gabriel Donner pointed out, “The (Swedish) migration board information regarding Iranian prisons tell us that torture and rape is common and it is a breach of international law to subject any person to such treatment. Some of them are killed straight off, some of them succeed in going into hiding, some of them escape to another place, but you are putting them at risk.”

Strandsson’s Iranian passport has been taken away. Her first choice is to remain in Sweden, if possible, the actress said.

“I read the Bible and I understood what Jesus said about peace, about love, about kindness, and in my heart I became a Christian when I was in Iran,” she said earlier.

Sweden has otherwise been generous in granting asylum to others.

In April, a prominent pro-choice activist from El Salvador, Maria Teresa Rivera, became the first known person to be granted asylum for “abortion persecution” after Sweden agreed to provide her protection from “political persecution” in her country.

The Swedish Migration Agency officially granted Rivera and her 11-year-old son political asylum, agreeing it is “clear that this (political) persecution is rooted partly in her sex as female,” and “political opinions.”

Last year, Lund County administration in south Sweden said it was considering giving state-financed driving licenses and housing grants to those Swedish Islamic State fighters who had returned to the country after fighting for the terror group in Iraq and Syria, saying it would help them reintegrate into society.

Around 140 Swedish nationals had been identified as having returned to their home country after fighting for Islamic State, an al Qaeda offshoot also known as ISIS, ISIL or Daesh.

Severe persecution of Christians in Iran is common knowledge.

Iran is ranked eighth on Open Doors’ World Watch list of the world’s top 50 Christian-persecuting countries. The Islamic government in Iran persecutes Christians, particularly converts, on the belief that their religion is Western-influenced and a threat to the country’s Islamic identity.

Iranian authorities regularly raid and shut down house churches, imprisoning their leaders and torturing them. The government follows Sharia law, which calls for the death penalty for apostates……

RELATED ARTICLES:

Muslims enraged that Trump still hasn’t condemned Minnesota mosque bombing

Hugh Fitzgerald: Convenience Conversions In Prison

Afghani Muslim migrant German soldier dismissed, supports Hamas, said “F**k the Jews”

“The court’s decision said he claimed he had language difficulties because he was raised in Afghanistan and has only been in the Federal Republic for a few years.”

Why was he admitted into the Germany military in the first place? Do the Germans let anyone who walks into the country immediately join the military? When he was admitted, was he questioned to the slightest degree about his beliefs? Or would that have been “Islamophobic”?

“German court dismisses soldier for denying Israel’s existence,”

by Benjamin Weinthal, Jerusalem Post, August 5, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

A court in Hanover in the state of Lower Saxony affirmed in June the German armed forces’ decision to discharge a soldier because of his rejection of Israel’s right to exist and support for the US- and EU-classified terrorist organization Hamas.

The soldier of Afghan background lashed out at Israel, Jews and the United States during questioning by Germany’s military counter-intelligence service (MAD) in 2016.

According to the legal decision obtained by The Jerusalem Post on Friday, the unnamed soldier said “F***… the Jews and the USA” and justified support for Hamas and Fatah. The German military determined in March that the soldier’s comments violated Germany’s anti-hate law. MAD said the soldier also rejected Israel’s legitimacy as a state.

The court stated that the soldier’s pro-Hamas and anti-Israel assertions are incompatible with military conduct in Germany’s free, democratic social order.

In February, the soldier denied he is a supporter of Islamist groups and merely stated his position toward Israel. He added it does not matter to him what Israel does.

The soldier started his service in 2016 and planned to serve until 2024. The court’s decision said he claimed he had language difficulties because he was raised in Afghanistan and has only been in the Federal Republic for a few years. The soldier denied his allegedly anti-Jewish and anti-American statements when questioned by MAD. He said he is a Shi’ite and has showed sympathy for his religious brethren….

RELATED ARTICLES:

California: Muslims Attack Counter Jihad Coalition, Law Enforcement Caves to Muslims

271 jihadis have returned to France from the Islamic State, only some are in custody

Leaving a bacon sandwich outside a mosque is worse than sexually abusing an 11-year-old girl

Britain has made its priorities clear: offending Muslims and Islam is far, far more serious than jihad terror or the sexual abuse of Infidel girls. To move strongly against such crimes would be “Islamophobic.” The British authorities have made their taste for jihad terrorists, and disdain for their foes, abundantly clear. While I am banned from the country for the crime of noting — correctly — that Islam has doctrines of warfare against unbelievers, Britain has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation. Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain.

The UK Home Office recently admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth – tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the above.”

May’s government also admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Meanwhile, the UK banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country.

“In UK, Leaving a Bacon Sandwich Outside a Mosque Is Worse Than Sexually Abusing An 11-Year-Old Girl,” by Pardes Seleh, Independent Journal Review, August 2, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

In the UK, you can get jailed if you leave a bacon sandwich outside a mosque — but if you’re a Koran teacher who sexually abused his 11-year-old student, you might get spared because your wife doesn’t speak English.

That is what is being portrayed in a side-by-side comparison of two vetted news stories:

In 2014, a 40-year-old Islamic teacher by the name of Suleman Maknojioa was spared prison time despite reportedly sexually assaulting an 11-year-old girl. During a private tutoring session with the girl and her two brothers, Maknojioa had repeatedly rubbed the girl’s leg and reached underneath her headscarf to feel her chest.

He was first convicted of five counts of sexual abuse and given a 40-week jail sentence, but that was suspended after courts heard his family was “dependent” on him and he was on state benefits, and his wife speaks “very little English.”…

Later, in 2016, a man who was arrested for placing a bacon sandwich outside a British mosque was found dead in his prison cell halfway through his 12-month sentence.

35-year-old Kevin Crehan and his friends, 46-year-old Alison Bennett, 48-year-old Mark Bennett, and 31-year-old Angelina Swales, pleaded guilty to a “racially motivated attack” on the Jamia Mosque in Bristol earlier that year.

The four had reportedly shouted racial slurs to worshippers, tied a flag with the words “no mosques” to the fence outside the mosque, and placed their bacon sandwiches in front of the mosque door and on the door handle….

RELATED ARTICLES:

UK cops release decision-making game ending with “right-wing extremists” beating Muslim to death

Australia: Synagogue construction blocked because Islamic jihadists would target it

Muslim who murdered Jewish girlfriend says ‘I’m going to kill every Jew. One isn’t enough for me.’

The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).

Muhammad Kharoff (centerr).

“‘I’m going to kill every Jew,’” by Hezki Baruch, Israel National News, August 2, 2017:

Muhammad Kharoff, the Shechem (Nablus) Arab who was arrested on suspicion of murdering 29-year-old Michal Halimi, admitted in court that the murder was done in order to help free convicted terrorists.

Halimi, who lived in the Binyamin-region town of Adam, was found dead in the Holon sands on July 24.

“I wanted to kidnap her and swap her for the prisoners,” Kharoff told the court.

Kharoff also denied that there was a relationship between himself and Halimi and threatened “to kill all the Jews.”

“One isn’t enough for me,” he said.

Kharoff was in a relationship with Halimi, and the two published on their Facebook pages their intent to become engaged.

An indictment will be filed against Kharoff in the coming days.

Meanwhile, Lehava CEO Bentzi Gopshtein said, “The price of assimilation and the left’s co-pollution (a play on the Hebrew word for coexistence) is pushing us [to the edge]. Here, another Jewess was murdered for the sake of coexistence.”…

RELATED ARTICLES: 

Sophisticated Australian Airplane Bombing Plot a Warning To the West

Jihadis in the U.S. military? “Security risks” found in Obama’s military recruitment of foreigners

UK: Christian woman prosecuted for talking about Christianity to a Muslim colleague

Attack on Israeli Embassy in Jordan

The Muslim war on the Jews must stop. Enough. Islam must be purged of its Jew hatred and its teachings calling for annihilation of the Jews must be expunged. The Jewish State of Israel must recognized by the Muslim world.

Of course that will not happen making war inevitable – which they will lose badly.

TWO JORDANIANS KILLED AND ISRAELI INJURED IN DEADLY EMBASSY SHOOTING AS TENSIONS ESCALATE

TWO JORDANIAN MEN HAVE BEEN KILLED AND AN ISRAELI INJURED AFTER A DEADLY SHOOTING AT THE “FORTRESS–LIKE” ISRAELI EMBASSY IN AMMAN, LOCAL AUTHORITIES HAVE CONFIRMED.

By Thomas Hunt, The Express, July 24, 2017:

In a statement, police said the two men had entered the embassy to carry out furniture repairs before the shooting took place.

Jordanian police sealed off the embassy compound and deployed dozens of anti-terrorism forces following the incident.

A police statement said: “We have started a large scale investigation into the incident and ordered the prosecutor general to look at all the details.
“Initial checks suggested the two Jordanian men had entered the embassy compound as workmen.”

Tensions escalated between the two countries when Israel installed metal detectors at entry points to Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem after two Israeli policemen were shot dead by three Arab-Israeli gunmen near the site on Friday.

The move sparked a series of violent clashes and led Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority President, to halt security cooperation with Israel.

Israeli Minister for Regional Development Tzachi Hanegbi said: “They [the metal detectors] will remain.“The murderers will never tell us how to search the murderers.“If they [Palestinians] do not want to enter the mosque, then let them not enter the mosque.”The Jordanians were reportedly working for a furniture company
But Israel’s public security minister Gilad Erdan called for the measures to be eased for some “regular” worshippers.Mr Erdan instead called on officials to “avoid putting all of these [people] through metal detectors” and focus only on potential troublemakers.Secretary General of the Arab League Ahmed Aboul Gheit said: “The Israeli government is playing with fire and risking a major crisis with the Arab and Islamic world.Jordanian police sealed off the embassy compound and deployed dozens of anti-terrorism forces
“Jerusalem is a red line that Muslims and Arabs cannot allow to be crossed… and what is happening today is an attempt to impose a new reality on the Holy city.”He added that the current Israeli policies “hurt the feelings” of the whole Muslim world not only Palestinians.Many observers are worried that the violence will overspill into neighbouring countries in the Middle East.Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish President, said: “No one can expect the Islamic world to remain unresponsive after the humiliation Muslims suffered with the restrictions at the Noble Sanctuary.”

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Islamic State calls on Muslims to target businesses owned by Jews

The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); as fabricating things and falsely ascribing them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); claiming that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); loving to listen to lies (5:41); disobeying Allah and never observing his commands (5:13); disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more.

“Three businesses in Glasgow’s south-side named as ‘targets’ in ISIS-affiliated hit list,” by Craig Williams, Glasgow Live, July 18, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Three businesses in Glasgow have been included in a list of ‘target’ sites in the UK by fanatics linked to ISIS.

In messages encouraging aspiring terrorists to carry out ‘lone wolf’ attacks on the UK’s Jewish community, the three locations on the south side of the city are listed in posts on pro-ISIS social media channel Lone Mujahid.

The information comes from Spanish ISIS monitoring group Asesoria de Inteligencia y Consultoria de Seguridad (the Spanish Consultancy of Intelligence and Security or AICS), where analysts there have labelled the social media channel as “very dangerous” owing to its distribution of explosive manuals and attack procedures, thought to have been used by ISIS sympathisers in Europe.

Their report, seen by Glasgow Live and dated July 14, indicates that information concerning businesses and shops owned by Jewish people in the UK is being shared widely amongst Islamist propaganda sites tied to ISIS.

Contained within the list are the business locations and opening times alongside information about the proprietors themselves.

The AICS report ends by concluding that, given the information “they cannot rule out that some types of hostile action could be levelled against some of the listed establishments.”…

It is feared that as many as 30 Scots are believed to have travelled to Syria and Iraq to join the extremist groups over the past few years….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Muslim cop tells friends, not investigators, he was “startled” by unarmed woman he killed

Islamic State flogs teenagers for playing soccer

Muslim screaming ‘Allahu Akbar breaks into New York City church, vows to ‘kill any Christians’

Don’t be concerned. He was just a homeless guy. Don’t be concerned. He was mentally ill. Don’t be concerned. He was reacting to the bombing of his homeland. Don’t be concerned. He was lashing out after the President marginalized him. What’s that? The Islamic doctrine of jihad warfare against Christians and other non-Muslims? Oh, don’t pay any attention to that. That’s entirely irrelevant, in each and every case.

“Homeless man busted for breaking into Midtown church, threatening to kill all Christians,” by Shayna Jacobs and Rocco Parascandola, New York Daily News, June 1, 2017 (thanks to Creeping Sharia):

A homeless man shouting “Allahu akbar” busted a Midtown church’s door with a wrench and threatened to return and shoot all Christians, police sources said Wednesday.

The drama began when Noel Droni asked a 37-year-old homeless man outside the interdenominational Times Square Church, on W. 51st St., if he was a Christian on Monday, cops said. When the man told Droni he was Christian, Droni allegedly pulled a red wrench from his backpack and smashed the church’s glass door.

He yelled “Allahu akbar,” Arabic for “God is great,” and then vowed violence, police said.

“I am going to blow up the church and come back and kill any Christians,” he said, according to court papers….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Pakistan: Muslim refuses to pay repair bill, has Christian repairman jailed for blasphemy

Hugh Fitzgerald: Rabbis Stand Up For Their “Hoosier Sisters and Brothers Who Are Muslim” (Part One)