san diego muslim praying

VIDEO: Islamization of San Diego Public Schools

San-Diego-Unified-School-DistrictI appeared on One America News network’s The Daily Ledger to discuss the islamization and madrassing of the San Diego public schools.

The Islamization of public schools has been proceeding for many years.

Jewish students are the most bullied, but there are no safe places or Judaism lessons in public school. Or for Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, etc. This is part of the escalation of the Islamization of the workplace.

muslim prayingIt is telling that the public school district is working with a designated terrorist group, CAIR.

This is nothing short short of surrender to an brutal, invading ideology.

Textbook companies have their material on Islam vetted by Islamic groups that turn them into dawah presentations, proselytizing for Islam.

Innumerable textbooks and other material used in public schools today presents a rosy and whitewashed picture of Islam, while being harshly critical of Judaism and Christianity.

Our children are being taught to despise and be ashamed of their own heritage and culture, and to think that any negative word about Islam, even in connection with jihad terror attacks, is racist and Islamophobic. This is a recipe for surrender and subjugation.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Cover-Up of Florida Refugee Attack on 75-Year-Old Woman

Poll: Democrats More Out Of Touch Than GOP, Trump

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on The Geller Report.

Riyad Mansour Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine

VIDEO: Palestinian Leader, Muslim terrorists who murder Americans are ‘victims’

No matter how bloodthirsty jihadis become, and how high the death toll mounts, Islamic supremacist spokesmen will claim victim status. It is a tested tactic that has been proven repeatedly to bamboozle Western authorities and get them to start signing checks, so why not?

“Palestinian Authority Official: Terrorists Who Murder Americans Are ‘Victims,’” Washington Free Beacon, April 21, 2017:

…Riyad Mansour, the “Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine [sic] to the United Nations,” was asked to comment on the PA’s payment of benefits to the family of the terrorist who murdered an American tourist last year.

The Taylor Force Act, a bill under consideration in Congress that would cut U.S. aid to the PA over the payments, is named after the U.S. Army veteran and Vanderbilt graduate student who was killed.

The PA spends approximately $300 million a year on payments to convicted terrorists and their families, money that originates largely from aid donations by western countries. The terrorism benefits program, which comprises around eight percent of the PA budget, has emerged as a significant point of contention in U.S.-Palestinian relations.

“I don’t know exactly what you’re referring to,” Mansour responded, before claiming that the PA is against the killing of civilians. The reporter repeated his query about Taylor Force.

“Who? Who is?” Mansour asked.

“Taylor Force, an American who was killed in Jaffa last year, March 8, and the family of the terrorist who killed him are receiving payments from the PA. What do you have to say about that?” the reporter asked.

“Listen, this issue is, that is now, uh, in circulation for discussions,” Mansour said, later asking rhetorically, “Who is the killer and who is the terrorist?”

“There are a large number of Palestinians who are receiving compensation,” Mansour acknowledged. “They are victims of Israeli terrorism.”

RELATED ARTICLES:

Michigan: Another Muslim doctor and his wife arrested for conspiring to perform female genital mutilation

Anti-Semitic pro-Sharia advocate Linda Sarsour to give CUNY commencement speech

L-NYPD-cobradocs

New York City censored anti-terror handbook to appease Muslims

This is an illustration of the truth about what I said last Thursday at Truman State University: that charges of “Islamophobia” and “racism” are used to hinder legitimate counter-terror efforts, thus paving the way for more jihad terror attacks.

nypd anti terror unit“The purge of a report on radical Islam has put NYC at risk,” by Paul Sperry, New York Post, April 15, 2017:

The NYPD has had a stellar track record of protecting the city from another 9/11, foiling more than 20 planned terrorist attacks since 2001. But some worry the department is losing its terror-fighting edge as it tries to please Muslim grievance groups.

Last year, for instance, it censored an anti-terror handbook to appease offended Muslims, even though it has accurately predicted radicalization patterns in recent “homegrown” terror cases. Rank-and-file NYPD officers, detectives and even intelligence and counterterrorism units are officially barred now from referring to the handbook or the scientific study on which it was based.

Former law-enforcement officials fear its removal as a training tool may be hurting efforts to prevent terrorist activity, such as the vehicle-ramming attacks plaguing European cities.

“The report was extremely accurate on how the radicalization process works and what indicators to look for,” said Patrick Dunleavy, former deputy inspector general of the New York state prisons’ criminal-intelligence division, who also worked with the NYPD’s intelligence division for several years.

Mayor de Blasio agreed in January 2016 to purge the remarkably prescient police training guide “Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat” to help settle a federal lawsuit filed by the ACLU and Muslim groups who claimed the NYPD’s anti-terror training discriminated against Muslims.

Written 10 years ago, the seminal NYPD report detailing the religious steps homegrown terrorists take toward radicalization is now more relevant than ever, with recent terror suspects closely following those steps. But in 2007, the same year the study was released, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) organized a protest against it, complaining it “casts suspicion on all US Muslims.” Even though federal law enforcement has long-shunned CAIR as a suspected terrorist front organization, “groups like CAIR were insistent on having it removed, and de Blasio caved into them,” Dunleavy said.

Under the city’s unusual settlement agreement, the NYPD as well as New York state agencies were forced to remove its 90-page anti-terror study — described by plaintiffs as “deeply flawed” and “inflammatory” — from databases and no longer rely on it “to open or extend investigations” into terrorist activities. Also, police must now commit to “mitigating the potential impact” of any counterterrorism investigation on the Muslim community.

The deal has had a chilling effect on other city police forces’ ability to use fact-based, trend analysis to develop terrorism cases, experts say. They warn that purging such studies deprives local law enforcement of the ability to understand how ISIS and other jihadists recruit, organize and operate — which is critical to disrupting terrorism plots.

“The FBI has its hands full with over 1,000 open cases on ISIS terrorist suspects already in the US,” former FBI Agent John Guandolo said, “and it needs the help of well-trained eyes and ears on the ground at the local and state level.”

“The bad guys know if police don’t know this stuff at the ground level, they win,” added Guandolo, who trains sheriffs departments across the country to ID local jihadi networks through his consulting firm, Understanding the Threat LLC.

The authors of the report, led by Mitch Silber, former NYPD director of intelligence analysis, examined hundreds of “homegrown” terrorism cases and found that suspects followed the same “radicalization” path. Key indicators include: alienating themselves from their former lives and friends; giving up cigarettes, drinking and partying; wearing traditional Islamic clothing; growing a beard; becoming obsessed with Mideast politics and jihad; and regularly attending a hardline mosque. In other words, the more they immersed themselves in their faith, the more radical they grew.

“You can take all the terrorist cases since that report and compare the information on the subject and the case and see stark similarities to what Mitch laid out,” Dunleavy noted.

The terrorists who carried out recent attacks in Boston; Fort Hood, Texas; Little Rock, Ark.; Chattanooga, Tenn.; San Bernardino, Fla.; Orlando; Philadelphia and at Ohio State University, among others, followed a similar pattern of radicalization. In each case, the Muslim attacker was influenced through “incubators of extremism” within the Muslim community, including Islamic student associations, schools, bookstores and mosques. Jihadi websites also played a role, but what unifies them all is Islamic doctrine. As the NYPD study found, “The ultimate objective for any attack is always the same — to punish the West, overthrow the democratic order, re-establish the caliphate, and institute Sharia,” or Islamic law.

“The radicalizer is Sharia, not the Internet,” said Philip Haney, a former Homeland Security counterterrorism analyst. Haney says the feds are plagued by their own PC censorship. Bowing to pressure from CAIR and other Muslim groups, Homeland Security and the Justice Department have purged anti-terrorism training materials and fired instructors deemed offensive to Muslims. CAIR-launched protests also helped convince the FBI to recently suspend an Internet program aimed at preventing the radicalization of Muslim youth.

“If we fail to correct this situation, it is inevitable that more attacks will occur,” warned Haney, author of “See Something, Say Nothing.”…

RELATED ARTICLES:

Fresno shooting rampage – 3 people killed, suspect yelled ‘Allahu Akbar,’ made posts against white people

Muslim cleric: Wife-beating “is more of a psychological beating, the purpose of which is to humiliate the wife”

Al-Azhar, the foremost institution in Sunni Islam, refuses to declare the Islamic State apostate

Muslims-in-prison

Why Prisons Are Breeding Grounds for Jihad Terrorists by Ming Gordon

Recent headlines have lamented Islamic sharia control of entire prison housing blocks in Great Britain. At home, American political leaders are beginning to recognize and assess the threat of religious radicalization in prisons. It is a growing threat, in need of vigorous oversight and management. But efforts to combat this serious homeland security threat will flounder so long as well-intentioned but constitutionally unnecessary religious liberty legislation continues to be extended beyond the general public to inmates. It’s one thing to address the encroachment on religious free exercise that was rampant in the Obama years, as witnessed during its death throes. And legislation passed in the early 1990s was necessary to protect free exercise by law-abiding religious believers, as evidenced by Obamacare’s preventative care mandate that requires coverage for potentially abortion-inducing drugs. Designed as a shield against government intrusions on religious liberty, hostile inmates and their allies will use it as a sword to harass and intimidate prison chaplains, administrators and policy makers. Extending extra-constitutional protection to inmates is a recipe for trouble that will undermine correctional officials and embolden radical elements. The danger is easily remedied if Congress has the will and the courage to retract an unwarranted extension of religious liberty legislation known as RLUIPA as it applies to prison populations, and leave inmate free exercise issues to be governed by the First Amendment. Unless this modest remedy is advanced, prison radicalization will deepen and correctional authorities will soon face a crisis.

US prisons are not free to develop their own policy about religion based on First Amendment standards. As odd as it may sound, local jails and state and federal correctional institutions are bound to a higher standard than is established by the First Amendment. And the reason is that politically conservative religious liberty advocates have required it. Here, in brief, is the backstory.

In 1990 Justice Antonin Scalia authored Smith v. Oregon — his one great error. Smith held that laws of general applicability that are religiously neutral yet have an incidental impact of religious free exercise are not constitutionally suspect and are reviewed in court challenges by a low standard: is the law rationally related to some legitimate government power? If so, the incidental impact of free exercise is part of life. That is termed the “rational relationship test” — usually an easy test for government to satisfy.

In response Congress and 22 states have passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). It elevates the standard in all such cases for federal government action (and state action in states where similar state laws have been adopted). That standard is that the government must show a “compelling government interest” that cannot be achieved by any alternative means that is less restrictive of religious free exercise. That is “strict scrutiny,” and is often fatal to challenged government action. That is critical, and is the reason the Hobby Lobby case defeated the Obamacare mandate for an employer with a religious objection to provide its employees with “preventative care” insurance coverage that included emergency contraception that the employer and the FDA said may be an abortifacients. Hobby Lobby was an RFRA case.

Jump ahead to the year 2000. Congress passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). It amended RFRA and applies it to all prisoners. It thus applies  “strict scrutiny” to any action that constitutes a “substantial burden” to an inmate’s practice of religion and defines religion so broadly that it includes everything from typical religious activity we are familiar with in the USA to anything an inmate sincerely professes – things such as Tarot cards, Wiccan practices, and Santeria are all protected, and so are “religions of one” in which the inmate is the only person in the world who holds a particular belief, so long as it is sincere. Of course, the law covers Judaism, Islam and Christianity. It has some good results — such as kosher meals for sincere Jewish inmates, etc. But there are problems brewing. Here is the key: RLUIPA’s strict scrutiny is not required by the Constitution. US Supreme Court case law holds that when you go to prison, part of the penalty for crime is potential restriction of religious liberty. If a prison has a “legitimate penological justification” for restricting some religious practice — say, inmates drinking communion wine or possessing a dagger for a Satanic ritual — that is enough to limit the free exercise.

Now, those examples are obvious, and would likely survive even strict scrutiny analysis. But recently, some state’s correctional systems, under the pressure of RLUIPA litigation, have recognized groups previously considered “disruptive groups” as religions – including the Nation of God on Earth, a.k.a. the 5% or Five Presenters. It is an offshoot of Nation of Islam. In another case, one state yielded to an adult inmate who converted to Islam and wanted a circumcision. Prison authorities were obliged to accommodate him and transport him to a hospital for the procedure.  The standard in those cases was not the constitutional test of “reasonable penological justification” — with its deference to correctional experts to identify security and safety risks — but strict scrutiny under RLUIPA. So as a result, we may see challenges in the future that go to the heart of what may be fertile recruiting ground for radicalization — prisons — like the problem that is happening in Great Britain. This could be about any religion.

In the federal system, Muslim inmates at Terre Haute, a maximum security federal compound that holds special monitoring inmates, are allowed to participate in group prayer, which is led by one of the inmates who is elected as the leader. That includes the “American Taliban” guy.

But the Constitution and federal judges are not the ones who mandate this. Congress is. It is all about RLUIPA. And religious conservatives are its main supporters. They have championed the law in some worthwhile cases, but the broad reach of the law is dangerous. In many states, no inmate is permitted to “lead” a group religious activity, as it may give him power or influence over other inmates. But challenges are sure to come, in view of the federal prison system yielding on the issue. This is why RLUIPA is a bad idea. But the conservatives don’t think so. They point to Judge Gorsuch’s decision in Yellowbear v. Lampert. But RLUIPA opens up the breeding ground for radicalization — and not just in one religion, but also in any, although jihadis are clearly taking concerted advantage of this situation.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Hugh Fitzgerald: Prester John in the Forbidden City?

Muslim Chechnya opens first concentration camp for homosexuals since Hitler

ISIS-Threat-to-USA

The Islamic State Strikes in Russia

“Listen, Putin, we will come to Russia and will kill you at your homes” – and subways. My latest in FrontPage:

Ten people were killed and many others injured Monday when an Islamic jihadi exploded a bomb filled with shrapnel on the St. Petersburg metro. Another bomb was found in a different train station but was defused before it exploded. According to Reuters, “authorities had established the identity of the suspected suicide bomber and that the suspect was a 23-year-old from central Asia who had carried an explosive device into the St Petersburg metro in a rucksack” and had links to the Islamic State. And so this jihad attack looks to be the fulfillment of a vow the Islamic State made last summer: to strike in Russia, and strike hard.

In a video released last August, an Islamic State jihadi declared: “Listen, Putin, we will come to Russia and will kill you at your homes … Oh Brothers, carry out jihad and kill and fight them.” The video also showed Islamic State jihadis, according to a subtitle, “breaking into a barrack of the Rejectionist military on the international road south Akashat [Anbar province, Iraq].”

“Rejectionists” are Shi’ites, who in the view of Sunnis are guilty of rejecting the legitimate authority of the first three caliphs, Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman. The Russians in Syria are backing the Alawite regime of Bashar Assad, which is aligned with the Shi’ites of Iran (and the Alawite religion is itself an offshoot of Shi’ite Islam), and fighting the Islamic State. Hence the rage of the Islamic State against Russia – although Western analysts would do well to avoid the pitfall of thinking that if Russia were not involved in Syria, the Islamic State would not have struck in St. Petersburg.

In reality, the Islamic State’s enmity toward Russia goes much deeper than anger at its presence in Syria. On July 1, 2014, just after the Islamic State had declared itself the new caliphate – that is, the sole legitimate government for all Muslims anywhere on earth – its new caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, issued a declaration entitled, “A Message to the Mujahedin and the Muslim Ummah in the Month of Ramadan.” In it, he said:

O ummah of Islam, indeed the world today has been divided into two camps and two trenches, with no third camp present: The camp of Islam and faith, and the camp of kufr (disbelief) and hypocrisy – the camp of the Muslims and the mujahidin everywhere, and the camp of the jews, the crusaders, their allies, and with them the rest of the nations and religions of kufr, all being led by America and Russia, and being mobilized by the jews.” – Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the Islamic State’s caliph Ibrahim, in his message upon being named caliph, “A Message to the Mujahedin and the Muslim Ummah in the Month of Ramadan,” July 1, 2014 (capitalization as in the original).

The self-styled caliph couldn’t have been clearer: as far as he is concerned, the greatest enemies of the Muslims are the Jews, as he knows from his Qur’an (5:82). This sinister enemy of the Muslims has mobilized the United States and Russia to lead “the camp of kufr (disbelief) and hypocrisy” against “the camp of Islam and faith.” As far as the Islamic State is concerned, this is an eschatological struggle, the apocalyptic showdown between good and evil.

And given the exultant brutality of the Islamic State, they may very well have a point. But Western analysts would do well to realize that no adjustment of foreign (or domestic) policy is going to prevent attacks such as the one in St. Petersburg Monday, or the recent Islamic State jihad attack in London, or any of the others. Nor will the destruction of the Islamic State itself end this conflict: not only will its jihadis in Iraq and Syria be dispersed throughout the world to wage jihad in new countries, but other Muslims will also take up this cause, and enlist in the war between Islam and unbelief.

This is not just one way that the Islamic State and other like-minded Muslims look at the world. It is the only way. It is the prism through which they view all political events and issues. It is, likewise, the one aspect of this broad and spreading conflict that Western analysts continue to minimize, downplay, or ignore outright. And so as long as we fail to heed Sun Tzu’s adage that one must know one’s enemy in order to defeat him, we will continue to fail to defeat him.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Denial begins: Daily Mail highlights claim that St. Petersburg jihad murderer “didn’t say his prayers”

St. Petersburg jihad murderer is Muslim from Kyrgyzstan, Akbarzhon Jalilov

france burning cars

France: 60% of the population doesn’t feel safe anywhere

And it’s only going to get worse. The 40% just don’t fully realize what is happening yet. The jihad is upon France, and its restive Muslim population that is already turning parts of Paris into a war zone isn’t going to calm down and become a productive and loyal sector of French society. The unrest that already has 60% of the French people feeling unsafe has only just begun.

“Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere,’” by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, March 17, 2017:

Fearing terror attacks, the majority of people in France are pessimistic about the nation’s security situation, with six in 10 saying they no longer feel safe anywhere according to an IFOP-FIDUCIAL poll.

The survey found that 93 per cent of French believe the threat of more terror attacks is high, and 71 per cent feel the security situation in France has got worse over the last five years.

More broadly, 59 per cent of those polled said they did not feel safe anywhere, with almost one in four (24 per cent) opting to “strongly agree” with the statement.

Reflecting the insecurity respondents said they felt, 69 per cent think the police and gendarmerie are understaffed, and the survey found the French overwhelmingly have a positive view of law enforcement.

The vast majority of respondents (88 per cent) believe France should deport foreigners sentenced to prison for serious offences, and 84 per cent want the country to create more prison places.

A slight majority (55 per cent) would like to see France exit the European Union’s open borders Schengen zone.

With security a major issue in this year’s presidential elections, the survey found Marine Le Pen was judged the candidate with the best policies in both keeping property and people safe (32 per cent) and in the fight against terror (35 per cent).

Some way behind the Front National candidate were Emmanuel Macron (21 per cent citing security of goods and people, 19 per cent fighting terrorism) and Francois Fillon (19 per cent backed the centre-right candidate’s policy solutions in the two areas).

A national state of emergency has been in force in France since Paris suffered one of the worst terror attacks in recent European history in November 2015, when 130 were killed in a series of bombings and shootings across the city.

And in June the following year, a Tunisian migrant deliberately drove a 19-tonne cargo truck into crowds celebrating Bastille Day on the Promenade des Anglais in Nice, in an attack which resulted in the deaths of 86 people.

However, terrorism isn’t France’s only worry, as last month saw weeks of violent riots spread through Paris suburbs, with cars torched, windows smashed, and shops looted.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Germany: Five Muslim migrants gang-rape seven-year-old girl at refugee center

Convert to Islam from Texas is now top Islamic State leader

burka-with-children-800x536

‘You are the future of Europe’: Turkish President urges Muslims to have at least 5 kids

Immigration jihad, population jihad, academic jihad, violent jihad, workplace jihad, economic jihad, legal jihad — every which way, they’re coming at us.

Mark Steyn tackles the population jihad in his excellent book, America Alone: The End of the World As We Know It. Ten years ago, Steyn foresaw this: “It’s the Demography, Stupid.”

Most people reading this have strong stomachs, so let me lay it out as baldly as I can: Much of what we loosely call the Western world will not survive this century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our lifetimes, including many if not most Western European countries. There’ll probably still be a geographical area on the map marked as Italy or the Netherlands–probably–just as in Istanbul there’s still a building called St. Sophia’s Cathedral. But it’s not a cathedral; it’s merely a designation for a piece of real estate. Likewise, Italy and the Netherlands will merely be designations for real estate. The challenge for those who reckon Western civilization is on balance better than the alternatives is to figure out a way to save at least some parts of the West.

Every Muslim woman in the West has an obligation to jihad. As Europe imports millions from the Muslim world, the women bring this with them.

Former Muslim physician, Wafa Sultan, The God Who Hates:

The status of women in Muslim countries is a human catastrophe that the world has ignored for centuries and for which it is now paying a high price for ignoring. An oppressed and subjugated woman cannot give birth to an emotionally and mentally well-balanced man. The invisible Muslim woman has been and continues to be the hen who incubates the eggs of terrorism and provides them with the necessary warmth to hatch the terrorists. The woman who stands before the television camera and tells the world, “Three of my sons were martyrs and I hope the fourth becomes one, too,” is a woman who has been deprived of her motherhood. And when she continues, “My sons are now celebrating their marriage with their virgins in paradise,” we must conclude that she has been deprived of sense and conscience, too! Who has deprived this woman of her motherhood, her mind, and her conscience? People, both men and women, fall into the trap laid for them by those who educate them in the first years of their lives. People are what they are told to be.

And with the rich entitlement program for Muslim migrants in rich countries across Europe, the more Muslim children, the stealthier.

‘YOU ARE THE FUTURE OF EUROPE’: ERDOGAN URGES TURKS IN EU TO HAVE AT LEAST 5 KIDS

By RT, March 17, 2017:

Turkish President Recep Erdogan has urged all Turks living in Europe to have at least five children, saying they are the future of the continent and that it would be the best response to the “injustices” imposed on expatriates there.

“Go live in better neighborhoods. Drive the best cars. Live in the best houses. Make not three, but five children. Because you are the future of Europe. That will be the best response to the injustices against you,” Erdogan said in the city of Eskisehir on Friday, according to AP.

The comments were made while the Turkish president was campaigning for a ‘yes’ vote in an upcoming constitutional referendum that would grant him sweeping new powers.

It is the latest in an ongoing string of comments aimed at Europe after Turkish ministers were prevented from holding campaign rallies there.

The Netherlands has bore the brunt of the criticisms, after it prevented the ministers from addressing a crowd in Rotterdam on Sunday, and later used water cannons to disperse Turkish demonstrators in the city.

Since then, Erdogan has hurled a string of insults at the European country, including accusing it of state terrorism, acting like “Nazi remnants,” and having a “rotten” character.

However, the president is not the only government official who has made his distaste for the Dutch known.

The country’s interior minister, Suleyman Soylu, said late Thursday that the EU is “playing games” to prevent Ankara from becoming strong, suggesting that Turkey could send 15,000 refugees a month to Europe to “blow its mind.” The minister singled out both the Netherlands and Germany, as three German states previously cancelled scheduled rallies.

Also on Thursday, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu warned that Europe is headed for “wars of religion,” claiming Dutch politicians are taking the continent “to a cliff.”

In an effort to achieve a ‘yes’ vote in the referendum, Erdogan is heavily relying on support from the 5.5 million Turkish citizens living abroad.

If the legislation goes ahead, it would give the president the power to issue decrees, declare emergency rule, appoint ministers and state officials, and dissolve parliament.

Critics of the move say the success of the referendum would abolish the country’s system of checks and balances.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on The Geller Report.

germanminarets

Over 400 police, raid, search, then close mosque that was recruiting for ISIS

Oddly enough, the Muslim moderates and reformists that no doubt made up the overwhelming majority of the members of this mosque did not rise up and expel those who were working for the Islamic State. The reason for the anomaly eludes authorities.

“Germany: Over 400 police raid mosque,” by Victor Laszlo, The Rebel, March 15, 2017:

Hundreds of police in Germany raided, searched and closed a mosque and eight homes, and banned the organization “German Islamic Circle of Hildesheim” on March 14.

Bild reports:

Concerning the ban and dissolution of the association, Interior Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD) said: “With the ban on the organization, a hotspot of the radical salafist scene in Germany was destroyed.” Muslims were targeted for indoctrination there to mobilize them to leave for Syria and Iraq, according to Pistorius. They were incited in the mosque of the DIK [German Islamic Circle] to the IS and to commit the most serious crimes. “The ban is a hard and important blow against Islamists in Lower Saxony.”

(Full translation.)…

RELATED ARTICLE: Zuhdi Jasser’s assistant attended Garland jihad shooters’ mosque in Phoenix

islam bloody knife

Stop Playing ‘Let’s Pretend’ about Islam

The Catholic Thing published an article titled “Stop Playing ‘Let’s Pretend’ about Islam” by William Kilpatrick, who writes that we should be telling Muslims, as diplomatically as possible, that many aspects of their faith are deeply disturbing.

It’s disappointing that Lt. General William Mc Master, President Trump’s new National Security Advisor, has said that the Islamic State is “un-Islamic.” He also insists that organizations like ISIS “cynically use a perverted interpretation of religion to incite hatred and justify horrific cruelty against innocents.”  In short, the General seems to think that terrorism has nothing to do with Islam.

This kind of thinking prevailed under the Obama administration. And during those eight years, the Islamic threat grew by leaps and bounds. It would be a shame if a key person in the new national security team perpetuated such simplistic views of Islamic terrorism.

Many Church leaders have views not much different. For the last four years, we’ve been treated to a litany of ecclesiastical pronouncements that there is a solid wall of separation between Islam and violence. 

Some people seem actually to believe this counter-factual nonsense. Others probably see it as a good strategy – a way to strengthen “moderate Islam.”  The strategists are fond of saying that criticism of Islam itself will drive the moderates into the radical camp. From this point of view, the only way to promote positive change in Islam is to praise it, and hope that a self-fulfilling prophecy is set in motion.

But it’s not a good strategy. In fact, it gives the upper hand to the radicals. Here’s why. If everyone from national security advisors to the pope says that Islam fine as is, then there is no incentive to change. If there’s no problem with Islam – only with extreme splinter (“un-Islamic”), you undercut Muslim reformers. It’s difficult enough being a moderate Muslim; it’s downright dangerous to be a Muslim reformer. Why should the reformers stick their necks out if they get no reinforcement from prominent non-Muslims? And why should other Muslims listen to them if everything is fine the way it is?  This strategy turns Muslims away from the moderates and reformers and towards the imams. [Emphasis added]

Click here to read the rest of Mr. Kilpatrick’s column . . .

In line with Kilpatrick’s statement that denying that Islam is inherently violent only will “undercut Muslim reformers” a new website has been launched to help inform and thereby reform Islam. Kafir Net (KFRNET) is a new type of web site that allow us to work together to defeat political Islam. Watch this video for an introduction to a new concept for victory.

RELATED ARTICLES: 

Kansas City Bombing Scheme Becomes First Terror Plot of 2017

Rutland, VT mayor defeated over his plan to seed city with Syrian refugees

donald-trump

Opposition to Trump immigration ban is based on false pretenses

In this new video, I explain why opposition to President Trump’s immigration ban is based neither on fact nor on sound reasoning, but on a false imputation of motives. I taped this after the first ban was struck down, but since the same arguments are recurring now, this video remains relevant.

RELATED ARTICLE: Reza Aslan eats human brains, but it’s unlikely to help