Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar called for lighter sentences for Muslims who tried to join ISIS

And her basic premise was that jihad terrorism is all the fault of non-Muslims:

“Such punitive measures not only lack efficacy, they inevitably create an environment in which extremism can flourish, aligning with the presupposition of terrorist recruitment: ‘Americans do not accept you and continue to trivialize your value. Instead of being a nobody, be a martyr.’”

So you see, all we have to do is accept the poor dears, and jihad violence will disappear. This is a foolproof jihad-enabling argument, because when non-Muslims advocate for tough measures against jihadis, Rep. Omar can say that those measures will just “radicalize” more Muslims, and that the better way is simply to do nothing. This will, of course, allow jihad activity to continue unimpeded, since it doesn’t actually stem from “alienation,” but from imperatives within Islamic texts and teachings.

“Rep. Omar Called for Lighter Sentence for Men Who Tried to Join ISIS,” by Aaron Bandler, Jewish Journal, January 24, 2019:

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) called for a more lenient sentence for nine Somalian men in Minnesota who were convicted of attempting to join ISIS in November 2016.

Omar, then a Minnesota assembly member-elect, wrote in a letter to the judge presiding the case, Michael Davis, about “the ramifications of sentencing young men who made a consequential mistake to decades in federal prison.”

“Incarcerating 20-year-old men for 30 or 40 years is essentially a life sentence. Society will have no expectations of the to be 50 or 60-year-old released prisoners; it will view them with distrust and revulsion,” Omar wrote. “Such punitive measures not only lack efficacy, they inevitably create an environment in which extremism can flourish, aligning with the presupposition of terrorist recruitment: ‘Americans do not accept you and continue to trivialize your value. Instead of being a nobody, be a martyr.’”

Omar advocated for “a system of compassion” as a response to “fanaticism.”

“If we truly want to affect change, we should refocus our efforts on inclusion and rehabilitation,” Omar said. “A long-term prison sentence for one who chose violence to combat direct marginalization is a statement that our justice system misunderstands the guilty. A restorative approach to justice assesses the lure of criminality and addresses it.”

Omar added that such violent fanaticism stems from “systematic alienation” resulting from being barred from the instruments needed to induce change.

“If the guilty were willing to kill and be killed fighting perceived injustice, imagine the consequence of them hearing, ‘I believe you can be rehabilitated. I want you to become part of my community, and together we will thrive,’” Omar wrote. “We use this form of distributive justice for patients with chemical dependencies; treatment and societal reintegration.”

Omar’s letter concluded by stating, “The restorative approach provides a long-term solution – though the self-declared Islamic State may soon suffer defeat, their radical approach to change-making will continue as it has throughout history – by criminalizing the undergirding construct rather than its predisposed victims.”…

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column with images is republished with permission. The featured image of Ilhan Omar is from her Facebook page.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *