Pro-Sharia, hijabbed Muslim Rep.-elect Ilhan Omar mocks Mike Pence’s Christian faith

Just imagine the establishment media uproar that would ensue if Pence had mocked Omar’s faith. But in this case, Leftist “journalists” will just join in with Omar and mock Pence themselves.
“Incoming Muslim Congresswomen Mock Pence’s Christian Faith,” by Patrick Goodenough, CNS News, December 13, 2018:

One of the first two Muslim women elected to the U.S. Congress took a snide dig on Twitter at Vice President Pence for sitting with eyes closed during a heated Oval Office meeting, posting a photo with the caption, “Jesus take the wheel!” – and the other incoming Muslim congresswoman applauded the insult.

Ihlan Omar’s (D-Minn.) tweet ended with the hashtag #BorderWall, a reference to the contentious issue discussed during President Trump’s meeting Tuesday with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)

The second Muslim woman elected to the House, Palestinian-American Congresswoman-elect Rashida Tlaib, “liked” Omar’s Pence tweet….

RELATED ARTICLE: Rashida to Wear Palestinian Garb Upon Her Swearing in to U.S. Congress

RELATED VIDEO: Will Newly Elected Pro-BDS Democrats Hurt US-Israel Alliance?

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images originally appeared on Jihad Watch. It is republished with permission. The featured photo is by David Beale on Unsplash.

The Fetishization of Islam in the West

Adherents to Islam – Muslims — are not rare on planet earth. They comprise a quarter of the world’s population, and yet they are treated in the West as though they are delicate flowers on the verge of extinction. They are above criticism and are not responsible for any of the atrocities that come out of their communities.

Islam is practiced by every race of people in every country on the globe, so it’s safe to say that Islam is not a race. That should be very clear by this point, and the ‘racist’ label has never applied. Islam is also a very bad idea at every level – religiously, politically and legally. Islam gives rise to societies that are corrupt and unjust, and where minorities and non-Muslims suffer. I don’t just question people who say they are Muslims, I question anyone, regardless of skin tone or gender, who looks at Islamic doctrines and tells me that Islam is a good idea worth defending.

What does it mean to fetishize something?

It means to have an irrational and excessive commitment to a thing. This is what we are seeing in the West today. People are overly invested in Islam whilst being unable to articulate why they are so drawn to and protective of it. Jews, who are a minority, are not accorded the same protection or respect as Muslims are in the West, with anti-Semitism becoming normalized and even slightly fashionable. Jews are fleeing the West because we are seeing the rise of anti-Semitism with the advent of more and more Muslims settling here. What is it about Islam that people are so passionate about? Freedom of speech is being eroded, with Parliaments in the UK and Canada drafting bills that outline what ‘Islamophobia’ is and determining what punishments should be meted out if a person doesn’t like Islam and is critical of it.

Animal welfare activists are silent when it comes to Islam. Police, councilors, politicians, care-home workers and teachers all turn the other way when it comes to grooming and rape gangs. Children’s lives don’t matter when it comes to supporting and defending or confronting Islam. Segregation goes on in London universities and at Labour party meetings in the UK, and feminists don’t bat an eyelid. A senior police officer tweeted out that arresting parents who commit female genital mutilation (FGM) on their daughters isn’t in the child’s best interests (physical abuse does not come without psychological and emotional abuse being applied also, so yes, arrests are in the child’s best interests). The officer’s sergeant had to take to Twitter to delete that tweet and tell us that every instance of FGM will be investigated and arrests will be made in his area. After a two-year period that saw hundreds of girls butchered, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests show that there has not been one arrest made in Middle England, and none in the area this sergeant presides over. In Bristol, the Somali community are saying they are being racially targeted because police want to ensure that girls aren’t being cut, even though FGM is a cultural practice of Somalis – clearly they would like to continue with the practice in the UK unchallenged.

Islam is very akin to fascism, insofar that it enjoys suppressing any opposition to it, and it also enjoys living under strict autocratic dictators (think Palestine or any Muslim majority country outside of capitalist and Westernized Dubai). Muslims vote for Muslims wherever they settle, no matter how qualified or not the person is. The only thing that matters to Muslims is that their representatives are sharia-compliant. Muslims have the notion of the Ummah, and by this they would classify themselves, wrongly, as being of one race worldwide, one brotherhood. The left align with Islam in this regard (think Antifa from UK to the USA to Australia – same tactics and of one mind). The left and Islam want more government and more suppression of any opposing factors who disagree with them, as well as wanting less freedom of speech and the closing down of differing ideas. And, like angry Muslim men who are infuriated for the smallest of reasons, they attempt to use violence to intimidate others in a bid to get their own way.

Islam and the left, at this particular juncture in time, make for good bedfellows. The left, I suspect, visualize a world where their tactics have succeeded and no one is allowed to hold any differing opinions to their own. Like thought-police or Nazis, they would walk among us, listening in to conversations for any wrongthink, and making arrests on a whim, much like the morality police do in Muslim-majority lands. Muslims, for their part, I can only imagine are gleeful that they have found such massively ignorant and uninformed support from the left. I also suspect the left visualize themselves living peacefully among their Muslim allies when they have won the ideological war that is raging in their heads and in real life. If there ever does come a day when we are living under leftist/Islamic rule, it will be interesting to see for how long these two groups can peacefully coexist.

Islam doesn’t tolerate non-Muslims when it becomes the majority. When Muslims become the majority, then the persecutions begin and rule of law does not apply, and Muslims demand that they are viewed as superior to everyone else and able to hold special privileges. The one thing that might allow Islam not to put its boot on the throat of the left is their united hatred of Jews and Israel.

Only time will tell, and we shall see if reason and logic win out, or whether or not we’ll be living under a leftist/Islamic regime.

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images originally appeared on Jihad Watch. It is republished with permission.

Al-Arabiya slams Linda Sarsour as “Islamist activist” and Muslim Brotherhood ally

“The Democrats battle against Republican control of the US Congress led to an alliance with political Islamic movements in order to restore their control on [sic] government.”

The Saudis can say that (al-Arabiya is a Saudi enterprise), but if you’re an American who says that, you’ll be smeared as a racist, bigoted “Islamophobe.”

Linda Sarsour

“Al-Arabiya slams Linda Sarsour as Muslim Brotherhood ally,” Jerusalem Post, December 9, 2018:

Linda Sarsour is an extremist who has “roots in [the] Muslim Brotherhood,” according to an English-language feature on Al-Arabiya, the Saudi Arabia based news channel. The article published in idiomatic English on Sunday accused the Brotherhood of “shaping the thoughts of American activist Linda Sarsour, [which resulted in] her declaring her ‘Jihad’ against US President Donald Trump.”…

Written by Huda al-Saleh, the article sought to expose what it called “details of calls to attack Trump by US ‘Muslim Sisters’ allied to the Brotherhood.” The article began by noting that two Muslim women, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, were recently elected to the US Congress.

However, “those sponsoring and supporting the two Muslim women to reach the US Congress adopted a tactic to infiltrate through their immigrant and Black minority communities in general,” insinuating that Muslim Brotherhood activists sought to drum up support for the Democratic candidates.

“The Democrats battle against Republican control of the US Congress led to an alliance with political Islamic movements in order to restore their control on [sic] government.” The piece asserted that the Brotherhood and “all movements of political Islam” are also tied to fighting against sanctions on Iran….

Under the headline “Sarsour activities with Muslim Brotherhood,” the feature detailed a series of events attended by the activist. It claimed she went to the International Network of Muslim Brotherhood in North America in 2016 which was “organized by the Islamic Circle of North America.” In 2018, groups in Canada raised concerns about Sarsour’s participation at another ICNA event, according to The Canadian Jewish News.

But Al-Arabiya pointed out that Sarsour appeared next to Samah Safi Bayazid, who had posted a photo with Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan on her Twitter account. In this roundabout explanation, the article sought to link Sarsour to Siraj Wahhaj, a “pioneering Islamic preacher in New York.” Unsurprisingly, the article then claimed that Wahhaj – “whom Linda Sarsour has admired and who in turn influenced her” – has been in the spotlight for being arrested in New Mexico.

Sarsour was also accused of using the term “jihad” during a speech about Trump. “These are terms used by the Muslim Brotherhood teachings and in the views of Sayyid Qutb,” the article claimed, going on to then link the same terms “used and preached also by [the] al-Qaeda terrorist organization.”

The article labeled Sarsour an “Islamist activist” for this speech, and asserted that her support of human rights is coded within use of terms that are also used by extremists. “What Linda Sarsour has said is not far from those [words] of Zainab al-Ghazali, one of the most prominent women of the Muslim Brotherhood.”

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images originally appeared on Jihad Watch. It is republished with permission.

Merkel urged EU countries not to move their embassies to Jerusalem

It’s not just that appeasement and kowtowing to violent intimidation and bullying has been the West’s foreign policy for so long; even worse is the fact that the powerful forces that are trying to preserve it as a policy are so self-righteous about it.

“Merkel urged EU countries not to move embassies to Jerusalem,” by Benjamin Weinthal, Jerusalem Post, December 4, 2018:

The founding director of the European Coalition for Israel in Brussels, Tomas Sandell, announced in a shocking video message on Thursday that German Chancellor Angela Merkel waged a campaign to prevent central and eastern European countries from moving their capitals to Jerusalem to preserve the Iran nuclear deal.

Sandell said in a Jerusalem Post exclusive report in November that Merkel called Romanian president, Klaus Iohannis, to convince him to not relocate his country’s embassy to Jerusalem. The move prompted him to go public.

Speaking from the European parliament, Sandell said, “What we have found out, something I heard for quite some time already, from central and eastern European countries that would have an inclination to move their embassy to Jerusalem, this is the natural thing for them to do, is that they have received phone calls from Berlin, from Angela Merkel, the chancellor. Basically, this cannot happen under any circumstances.”

“I have spoken to many Germans these last few days in Brussels,” he said. “They are not aware of this, and all of them would be shocked that all of the countries in the European Union today would want to block an embassy move to Jerusalem, not only for your own country, but for other countries that have the conviction [that] this is the right thing to do, the only country to do would be Germany. This is a big shock.”

He added that “this is something unprecedented. This is not the Germany we once knew. This is not the even Angela Merkel we once knew when she was elected.”

Sandell said many of Merkel’s telephone calls took place to European leaders in April when “many of the nations were seriously considering moving their embassies.”

Sandell said Merkel’s anti-Israel moves have to do with the Iran nuclear deal, which “has been very much supported by Germany [and] the German government.”

He added that Merkel’s move to block the relocation of embassies was also sparked by “how Germany did not block the marking of Israeli goods from disputed territories” in 2015. He said it was anticipated that Germany would stop the penalties against Israeli products. Germany instead implemented “this counterproductive measure” to punish Israeli goods, said Sandell….

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images originally appeared on Jihad Watch. It is republished with permission.

23 Million Nigerian Girls are Victims of Child Marriage

Over 23 million girls in Nigeria are victims of child marriage. 32 million, meanwhile, have suffered female genital mutilation as well. But what do these practices have to do with Islam? Bukhari 5.58.234 and Umdat al-Salik e4.3, respectively. And as they foster mass migration and open borders, globalists apparently believe that deeply ingrained religious indoctrination magically disappears upon migration. And just in case they do not disappear, everyone else must accept such practices, because it is “Islamophobic” not to do so.

Already the UK is considering raising the minimum age of marriage in order to try to stop forced child marriage.

 “U.N.: 23 Million Girls in Nigeria Are Victims of Child Marriage,” by Edwin Mora, Breitbart, December 3, 2018:

Over 23 million girls in Nigeria are victims of child marriage, the country representative for the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women revealed Sunday amid a campaign against gender-based violence in the African country.

Nigeria’s Leadership newspaper cited Comfort Lamptey, the U.N. Women’s country representative to Nigeria, as indicating on Sunday that “one in three women and girls aged 15-24 has been [a] victim of violence while one in five has experienced physical violence which is the highest in Africa.”

“She also said for too long, many women and girls have been subjected to various forms of violence, yet have remained silent due to impunity, stigma, and shame, among other inhibiting factors,” Leadership noted.

“With women and girls bearing the brunt of abduction, forced marriage and being used as human bombs [by Boko Haram]. Gender-based violence is evident also in the political realm, where women have reported numerous cases of victimization, intimidation, and harassment, in order to sideline them in the upcoming 2019 General Elections,” Lamptey said.

Violence against women takes many forms in Africa. Last month, Kenyan authorities sentenced a mother to six years for forcing her 13-year-old twin daughters to undergo female genital mutilation (FGM) “to avoid a curse from her deceased grandfather,” Reuters reported.

Referring to the recent conviction in Kenya, Mercy Chege, the director at the Plan International charity that rescued the twin girls, told Reuters, “A community member alerted us when they had heard the mother was organizing the girls to undergo the cut, so we informed the local authorities. Unfortunately, we were not able to prevent the circumcision as by the time the police conducted the raid and rescued the girls, they had already been cut.”…

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images originally appeared on Jihad Watch. It is republished with permission. The featured photo is by Joshua Oluwagbemiga on Unsplash.

CAIR official Zahra Billoo mocks Muslims in U.S. military after praising jihad terrorists

“The U.S. Air Force formally granted Staff Sgt. Abdul Rahman Gaitan a religious waiver to don a beard in service. Gaitan is the first Muslim airman to receive such an accommodation. In response, Billoo mocked Muslims serving in the U.S. military, sarcastically tweeting: ‘Great news, MashaAllah [according to God’s will]. You can now rock your Sunnah beard while bombing your Muslim brothers and sisters.’”

Zahra Billoo is executive director of CAIR’s San Francisco Bay Area chapter. She not only has problems with Muslims in the U.S. military, but in 2015, she tweeted that she “struggles with Memorial Day each year” about whether to honor American soldiers who died in wars.” Now Billoo is mocking Muslims who serve in the U.S. military.

CAIR continues to be accepted in mainstream American society, despite the fact that the group is Hamas-connected and anti-American/anti-Western at its core. Billoo “labeled American Muslims in the military as traitors for participating in combat operations targeting terrorists in predominately Muslim-majority countries.” Billoo has also “glorified Palestinian ‘martyrs’ families’ whose relatives participated in a terrorist attack against Israelis” as “an act of resistance,” called Israel supporters “baby killers,” and stated that she was “more afraid of racist Zionists who support Apartheid Israel than of the mentally ill young people the FBI recruits to join ISIS.”

Billoo does not accept as Muslim leaders those who support Israel or oppose the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

Zahra Billoo

“CAIR Official Mocks Muslims in U.S. Military After Praising Terrorists,” IPT News, November 27, 2018:

Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) official Zahra Billoo continues to judge Muslims who do not fall in line with her radical agenda.

Last week, reported that the U.S. Air Force formally granted Staff Sgt. Abdul Rahman Gaitan a religious waiver to don a beard in service. Gaitan is the first Muslim airman to receive such an accommodation.

In response, Billoo mocked Muslims serving in the U.S. military, sarcastically tweeting: “Great news, MashaAllah [according to God’s will]. You can now rock your Sunnah beard while bombing your Muslim brothers and sisters.”

Billoo, an attorney, leads CAIR’s San Francisco-Bay area chapter.

Instead of praising the U.S. military for overturning long standing practices to accommodate religious practices, Billoo basically labeled American Muslims in the military as traitors for participating in combat operations targeting terrorists in predominately Muslim-majority countries.

This sentiment is not surprising given Billoo’s history of defending terrorists. On Saturday, at an American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) conference, Billoo glorified Palestinian “martyrs’ families” whose relatives participated in a terrorist attack against Israelis – or as Billoo called it: “an act of resistance.”

“Even I don’t fully understand how horrible an apartheid Israel is doing,” Billoo said in a recording obtained by the Investigative Project on Terrorism. She was describing a recent trip to the Palestinian territories. “We hear here that the martyrs’ families are rewarded with homes and flowers and food. We learn that in Palestine that happens, because it doesn’t matter whether or not you approve of your teenager committing a crime. Whether or not it’s a crime is something we can debate. But it doesn’t matter whether or not you approved of it. The soldiers show up at your house the day after you lose child in an act of resistance. And they bulldoze your home. So of course, your community buys you a home.”

These are the views of a person who received a Community Builder Award last month, someone with a history of propagating radical Islamist and anti-Semitic remarks.

Earlier this month, Billoo openly stoked division by drawing a line in the sand by defining who she believes is a legitimate Muslim leader and who is not[.]

“I’m really cautious of who I call a Muslim leader,” Billoo said at a gathering with the Ecumenical Peace Institute, warning others to be aware “as you see countries in the Middle East, and even Muslim activists in the United States, take problematic positions supporting the state of Israel or opposing the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.”…..

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images originally appeared on Jihad Watch. The featured photo is by Luke Braswell on Unsplash.

Israeli “Freedom is basic” ad featuring model taking off niqab ripped as “Islamophobic,” is withdrawn

The propaganda arm of Teresa May’s shabby little police state chirps “Islamophobia” on cue. But isn’t it true that some women who wear the niqab or hijab do not do so freely?

What about Aqsa Parvez? Her Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it.

What about Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab?

Or the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; or Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; or Amira Osman Hamid, who faced whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized by her family for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told they had to wear the hijab or be fired; or the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; or the women in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; or the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; or the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; or the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; or the women in Iran who protested against the regime, even before the recent uprisings, by daring to take off their hijabs; or the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; or the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents; or the fifteen girls in Saudi Arabia who were killed when the religious police wouldn’t let them leave their burning school building because they had taken off their hijabs in their all-female environment; or the girl in Italy whose mother shaved her head for not wearing hijab; or all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab.

Courageous women in the Islamic Republic of Iran have been taking off their hijabs as a sign of resistance to the oppressive Sharia regime under which they live, and at least 29 women have been arrested for doing so. Who is standing in solidarity with them? No one. Apparently it would be “Islamophobic” to do so.

“Israeli ‘Freedom is basic’ niqab advert criticised,” by George Pierpoint and Osob Elmi, BBC News, October 31, 2018:

An advert for an Israeli clothing company which shows a woman ripping off a niqab and headscarf, has been heavily criticised online.

The ad, for clothing brand Hoodies, opens with a caption reading “Is Iran here?” and shows Israeli supermodel Bar Refaeli wearing a face veil.

Ms Refaeli then removes the niqab and dances before a voiceover states: “Freedom is basic.”

The video has been viewed thousands of times on various social media platforms and has triggered outrage and attracted accusations of Islamophobia.

It comes at a time of rising tension between Israel and Iran.

Many took to social media to express their disappointment and anger at the advert.

Bar Refaeli also shared the video on her Facebook page.

Ms Refaeli is one of the most prominent Israeli supermodels, and has more than five million followers on Instagram and Facebook.

Popular Israeli-Arab vlogger Nas Daily shared his reaction to the advert with his almost 10 million followers on Facebook.

He called the advert “terrible” and said he felt “angry” about the representation of Islam and women generally.

The online clip is part of a wider marketing campaign by the company which includes billboards and TV adverts.

The video was viewed more than 200,000 times on Instagram before it was removed by Hoodies on Tuesday evening….

EDITORS NOTE: This column with video and images was first published on Jihad Watch. It is republished with permission.

Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle supported community kitchen in mosque linked to 19 jihadists

Experts say the Duchess of Sussex has been ‘poorly advised’ and a simple internet search should have raised some questions.”

By whom?

“Meghan’s community kitchen housed in mosque ‘linked to 19 jihadists,’” by Jane Wharton, Metro, November 24, 2018:

A community kitchen supported by Meghan Markle is housed inside a mosque that has been connected to 19 extremists, it has emerged.

Experts say the Duchess of Sussex has been ‘poorly advised’ and a simple internet search should have raised some questions.

Meghan visited the Al Manaar Hubb Community Kitchen in a West London mosque after helping them write a cookbook following the devastating Grenfell fire disaster.

The Hubb lease the space in the mosque, which is run by Imam Samer Darwish, who has preached a number of inflammatory views on social media.

He has said that girls who listen to music may become strippers and women should not pray on their period or cry when visiting graves.

The anti-extremism think tank, Henry Jackson Society (HJS), has also linked the mosque to 19 jihadists, according to the Telegraph.

They include three of the four so-called ‘Beatles’, the Isis terror cell charged with torturing and killing hostages in Syria and Iraq….

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images originally appeared on Jihad Watch. It is republished with permission. The featured image is from Facebook.

Judge orders FGM charges dropped against Muslim doctor, says law against it is unconstitutional

“The federal judge in Detroit ruled in the historic case on Tuesday, ruling the law that prevents female genital mutilation (FGM) is unconstitutional.”

So apparently it cannot be outlawed at all. Welcome to the new, diverse, multicultural America.

“Federal judge orders female genital mutilation charges dropped in Detroit,” WJBK, November 20, 2018:

U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman

DETROIT (WJBK) – A federal judge has dismissed six charges of female genital mutilation against a doctor, declaring the nation’s female genital mutilation law as unconstitutional.

The federal judge in Detroit ruled in the historic case on Tuesday, ruling the law that prevents female genital mutilation (FGM) is unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman ruled that congress does not have the authority to make FGM illegal, which it had been classified as illegal under the Necessary and Proper Clause or the Commerce Clause.

The case involved Dr. Jumana Nagarwala who had been awaiting trial on female genital mutilation charges. She was arrested in the summer of 2017 and was released on a $4.5 million bond.

According to the opinion filed by Friedman, congress had banned FGM under a statute that states “whoever knowingly circumcises, excises, or infibulates the whole or any part of the labia majora or labia minora or clitoris of another person who has not attained the age of 18 years shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.”

Prosecutors said she did that with at least six girls at a clinic in the Detroit area, including two girls from Minnesota. The doctor denies that she committed a crime and says she performed a religious custom from her Muslim sect, the India-based Dawoodi Bohra.

The doctor, through her attorneys, argued that the law that the federal government had been using to charge her was passed through Congress without proper vetting.

Her attorneys argued that the act of FGM had no bearing on commerce, which judge Friedman agreed with in his opinion:

“That clause permits Congress to regulate activity that is commercial or economic in nature and that substantially affects interstate commerce either directly or as part of an interstate market that has such an effect. The government has not shown that either prong is met.”…

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images originally appeared on Jihad Watch. It is republished with permission. The featured photo is by Arwan Sutanto on Unsplash.

VIDEO: Muhammad, The Adult Infant by Joshua Winston

David Wood has made a great video on the hadiths (Sahih Muslim and Sahih al-Bukhari) that claim Muhammad was a cross-dresser who would receive his revelations whilst dressed in the garments of his favourite wife, the child-bride Aisha.

One more thing to be noted in relation to Muhammad’s alternative lifestyle choices is that he was also an adult infant. People seem to overlook the fact that Aisha was a child, so her clothes would not have fit him properly. There’s a name for this fetish: it’s called paraphilic infantilism or psychosexual infantilism. Essentially, it’s when an adult chooses to dress like a child. In major cities today, there are clubs where grown men can go and walk around with diapers on whilst sucking on oversized pacifiers. They can ‘goo’ and ‘gaa’ and roll around on the floor and soil their diapers if they so please.

There are also adults who accommodate this, people who do not dress as adult infants, people who will play the role of mummy or daddy. I wonder what role Aisha played while Muhammad was rolling around, squeezing his adult male form into her clothing. Did she wipe his botty? Did he suckle on her for comfort? These are all of the things that adult-infants do. It doesn’t stop at simply putting on a child’s clothing.

In today’s degenerate world of ‘anything goes’ (particularly when it comes to Islamic grooming gangs, which I would say absolutely is inspired by Muhammad’s love of sex with children), we can see Muhammad as being ahead of his time. A trail blazer for sexual degenerates. His own degeneracy knows no bounds. He will thigh children, dive into graves for one last shot at a corpse (claiming he’s sending her on her way to Heaven – any old excuse will do), take his adopted son’s wife off of him, and have more wives than he stipulated was legal.

Why do you think these things are all the norm in Islamic lands? A Moroccan cleric stated that marriage was still valid even after death and that the female could also still have sex with her deceased husband if she so chose (although how that would work, I’ve no idea). Six hours, I believe, was supposed to be the guideline if the law got passed on the deadline for having sex with a corpse. If my loved one died, I’d be overwhelmed with grief. The last thing on my mind would be one last roll in the hay.

When you discuss these things with Muslims, they always say that it’s got nothing to do with Islam and that it’s instead ‘cultural’. Well, Islam is a culture. Cultures are comprised of the religious, legal, and political systems within any given land. The religious element will shape (for the most part) a person’s moral compass and values. The legal element states what’s permissible – rape, robbery, etc. And the political element lets a person know what kind of government he is living under – Marxism, Communism, Capitalism, etc. Islam is all three of these things – a religion, a legal system, and a political system. Islam is a culture in itself. It controls everything a devout Muslim does, from when and how he urinates through to what he eats and how he prays.

Degeneracy can be found everywhere, of course, but it’s important to be able to stand up to and answer Muslims who would seek to erase the degeneracy of their prophet. And it’s also important to know why sex with children is so commonplace in Muslim lands. It’s because Muhammad normalized it.

RELATED VIDEO: Muhammad Was a Sex Addict! (Fun Islamic Fact #8) by David Wood.

EDITORS NOTE: This column with video by David Wood and images originally appeared on Jihad Watch. It is republished with permission.