Posts

Swedish government commissions, then withdraws under pressure, leaflet approving of child marriage

Why would the Swedish government issue this leaflet in the first place? Because child marriage is approved in Islam, and the Swedish government knows who the new masters of Sweden are.

“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria

“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law

There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council

“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology

Hadiths that Muslims consider authentic record that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:

“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).

Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).

Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.

Marrying young girls was not all that unusual for its time, but because in Islam Muhammad is the supreme example of conduct (cf. Qur’an 33:21), he is considered exemplary in this unto today. And so in April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.

Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:

The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.

Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”

According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.

“The National Board of Social Affairs withdraws ‘pedophile leaflet’ – was commissioned by the government,” translated from “Socialstyrelsen drar tillbaka ‘pedofilfolder’ – togs fram på uppdrag av regeringen,” Fria Tider, March 29, 2018 (thanks to Denny):

Domestic. After the morning’s quick and very powerful reactions to the National Board of Health’s new folder “Information for you who is married to a child,” the authority now withdraws the information sheet, which in social media has been accused of being a brochure for pedophiles.

It was on Thursday morning that it was discovered that the National Board of Health and Welfare published a leaflet entitled “Adapting to adults who are married to a child”.

The folder states, among other things, that it is “inappropriate for you to live together if the child is under 15 years” because it is forbidden to have sex with children under 15 in Sweden.

Nowhere in the text is there anything about prison.

In the magazine you can also read that “The Social Service may suggest that you do not live together for a shorter or longer period.”

The National Board of Health and Welfare also writes in the magazine that: “Both the Social Service and the Migration Board will work to give the child the opportunity to express his or her own opinion, where to live and how it wants it.”

“The illustrations are insensitive, it might have been suitable for information about school start or something else neutral,” says journalist Sakine Madon to SVT, pointing out that formulations like being “inappropriate if you live together” are far too soft, because child marriage is such a serious phenomenon.

After very strong reactions, the National Board of Health has decided to withdraw the material.

“The material has raised strong reactions and many views. We pull back the material and look over it, “said Petra Rinman, Unit Manager for Knowledge Center for Single Children, in a press release.

According to the National Board of Health and Welfare, the material has been developed within the framework of a government assignment to develop and disseminate information to children who are declared married, spouses, parents and other related persons with information about current laws and practice in Sweden.

The material is said to have been developed based on existing legislation.

“Sweden does not allow anyone under the age of 18 to be married in this country. However, according to current legislation, the main rule is that a marriage valid under the law of the country in which it is concluded is to be recognized in civil law in Sweden. New legislation is currently being prepared by the government, “said Pär Ödman, Chief Legal Officer of the National Board of Health.

The proposed preparation proposes “additional restrictions” for child marriages, the National Board of Health and Welfare writes. However, not a total ban.

In social media, many responded vigorously to the folder, and claimed, among other things, that it is a brochure for pedophiles….

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

Muslim pedophile grandfather sold children for sex in his ‘rape house’

All the authorities can do is ban anyone who wants to speak about this.

The British police are a disgrace.

Reportedly close to a million non-Muslim girls have been gang raped and trafficked in the UK.  The authorities did not pursue these crimes for years, for fear of being accused of islamophobia and racism (Islam is not a race). And still the child rape rages on. Politicians can keep turning a blind eye, law enforcement ignore it, so this pox on our communities continues get worse.

It’s because rape jihad is sanctioned under Islam. Sex slavery is sanctioned under Islam. Sex slavery and rape of the infidel is sanctioned and rewarded under Islam. Muslim clerics all over the world confirm the right to have sex slaves. It is in the Qur’an — the word of Allah.

PAEDOPHILE GRANDFATHER SOLD CHILDREN FOR SEX IN A TELFORD ‘RAPE HOUSE’ WHERE PERVERTS QUEUED DOWN THE STAIRS TO ABUSE YOUNGSTERS

  • Shahzad ‘Keith’ Khan ran a paedophile empire out of a terraced house in Telford
  • He died without facing justice despite mid-90s tip-off and 2013 case collapsing
  • The grandfather sold one girl for sex just hours after she had to have an abortion

By Sebastian Murphy-bates For Mailonline, 18 March 2018:

A grandfather was revealed as the paedophile who sold children for sex in a ‘Rape House’ where perverts queued down the stairs to abuse youngsters.

Shahzad ‘Keith’ Khan ran the peadophile ring from an ex-council house in Telford, West Midlands, where he sold girls for up to £2,000 a night.

Shahzad ‘Keith’ Khan

Police were tipped off about him in 1996, but he continued to run his depraved business, taking a 14-year-old’s virginity and picking up one of his sex slaves from outside a police station.

Khan (pictured) ran the paedophile ring out of a terraced house in Telford, Shropshire, but was described as bird-loving local man powering past cancer in his local paper as two chances to jail him were missed.

Another chance to catch Khan fell through in 2013, when a police case against him collapsed, Mirror Online reports.

Today brave survivors of his abuse exposed the terrifying ordeals he put young girls through.

One victim described feeling ‘dead inside’ as she was sold for up to £2,000 in the house, where Khan’s nephew and son would regularly stay. Both have been jailed for sex offences.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story – and it’s every story – it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

1,000 more children as young as 11 abused by Muslim rape gangs, police again did nothing!

Dino Nocivelli, a specialist child abuse solicitor, said: “These children were treated as sexual commodities by men who inflicted despicable acts of abuse. The survivors deserve an inquiry. They need to know how abuse took place for so long and why so many perpetrators have never been brought to justice.”

The answer is simple. The British Left created an atmosphere in which it was considered “racist” and “Islamophobic” to call attention to these crimes, since their perpetrators were Muslims. The British Left has such power over the public sphere in Britain that it successfully cowed and intimidated the law enforcement establishment into keeping quiet and doing nothing about these crimes, knowing it would be career suicide to do something so “Islamophobic” as to prosecute them.

So these cowardly police officials allowed thousands of young girls’ lives to be ruined instead of challenging this evil. When the epitaph of free Britain is written, the likes of Nick Lowles and Fiyaz Mughal will emerge as the ones who destroyed Britain as a free society, with eager help from self-serving politicians such as David Cameron and Theresa May.

“‘Girls must be saved from going through this hell’: Call for public inquiry into Telford sex scandal as it emerges up to 1,000 children as young as 11 were drugged, beaten and raped over 40 years,” by Alex Green, Mailonline, March 11, 2018:

A brutal sex gang raped as many as 1,000 young girls over 40 years in what may be Britain’s ‘worst ever’ child abuse scandal.

Girls in the town of Telford, Shropshire, were drugged, beaten and raped at the hands of a grooming gang active since the 1980s.

Allegations are said to have been mishandled by authorities, with many perpetrators going unpunished, while it is claimed similar abuse continues in the area.

Home Office figures show there were 15.1 child sex crimes reported per 10,000 residents in the year to September 2015.

Telford’s population is 155,000 – meaning a potential 225 victims.

Telford’s Conservative MP, Lucy Allan, has previously called for a Rotherham-style inquiry into the allegations and called the latest reports ‘extremely serious and shocking’.

‘There must now be an independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Telford so that our community can have absolute confidence in the authorities,’ she told the paper.

A mother and four teenage girls have been linked to the allegations of abuse.

Lucy Lowe, 16, died alongside her mother and sister after the man who had been abusing her, 26-year-old Azhar Ali Mehmood, set fire to their house.

The taxi-driver first targeted Lucy in 1997. She gave birth to his child when she was just 14.

Mehmood was jailed for murdering Lucy, her mother Eileen and her sister Sarah, 17.

However, he was never arrested or charged with any sex abuse crimes over his involvement with the young girl.

Another victim, who was drugged and gang raped by nine men two years later, said that Lucy’s death was used as a warning to other girls who might speak out.

The schoolgirl, who remains anonymous, said she was driven to try to kill herself.

‘I was scared my family would die like Lucy’s. I thought they’d only be safe if I killed myself,’ she told The Sunday Mirror.

In 2002 another schoolgirl was killed in an unexplained car accident in Telford.

Becky Watson, 13, was killed after a car she was in crashed. At the time the incident was reported as a ‘prank’.

However, it was revealed she had suffered two years of sex abuse at the hands of a grooming gang, which began when she was 11.

In tragic diary entries she told of how she was forced to ‘sleep around’.

Her mother, Torron Watson, went to the police on a number of occasion and even handed them a list of suspects.

But nothing was done.

She said: ‘Girls like Becky were treated like criminals. I was crying out for help but it felt like I had nowhere to turn. If Becky’s abuse had been properly investigated by the authorities more girls could have been saved from going through this hell.’

Vicky Round, a friend of Becky’s, was abused by the same gang.

They forced her into a crack concaine addiction aged 12.

By 14 she was taking heroine regularly.

She died aged 20 after a suspected drug overdose.

In Rotherham around 1,400 girls, many of them under-age, were sexually abused over a 16 year period at the hands of men from the town’s Pakistani community.

An estimate of the number of victims in Telford was calculated with the help of Professor Liz Kelly, from the Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit at London Metropolitan University, who reviewed the Mirror’s figures.

Dino Nocivelli, a specialist child abuse solicitor, said: ‘These children were treated as sexual commodities by men who inflicted despicable acts of abuse. The survivors deserve an inquiry.

‘They need to know how abuse took place for so long and why so many perpetrators have never been brought to justice.’…

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

Muslim rape gangs expanding activities, now preying on children in public parks

Police announced that arrests have been made in connection with an investigation into child sex exploitation (CSE) gangs targeting “vulnerable, underage” girls in Bury parks.

The Muslim rape gangs continue expanding their activities, despite widespread publicity and vows from authorities to stop them. Already up to a million girls have been abused.

The arrests come after similar scandals in the neighbouring borough of Rochdale, which involved networks of mostly Pakistani-origin men targeting overwhelmingly white, non-Muslim girls for sexual abuse and exploitation.

Muslim rape gang sex crimes against children are now at a “record high,” averaging 177 cases per day.

Despite the sickening abuse of innocent girls, appeaser Theresa May intends to keep the doors to immigration open wide even after Brexit, in obedience to the self-destructive European Union.

It is unconscionable that reckless government leaders have no interest in the well-being of their own citizens.

“Police Announce Probe into Grooming Gangs Preying on Children in Parks,” by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, March 2, 2018:

Police announced that arrests have been made in connection with an investigation into child sex exploitation (CSE) gangs targeting “vulnerable, underage” girls in Bury parks.
Greater Manchester Police (GMP) said the case — codenamed Burgos — has been underway since June last year when officers received reports that children around Clarence Park and Openshaw Park were being plied with alcohol and drugs then sexually abused by groups of men.

According to the Bury Times, officers made the announcement in order to “reassure the public” after reports on social media accused authorities in the borough of covering up the exploitation of up to 50 children.

A spokesman for Bury Council said authorities in the town “are currently working with nine young people under Operation Burgos following the police’s investigation.

“We have support in place for those affected and will await the outcomes of police investigations,” he added.

While police declined to give any details on how many arrests were made and what for, Superintendent Rick Jackson said: “Tackling child sexual exploitation is a priority for GMP and we will continue to work closely with our partners to safeguard children and prosecute offenders.”

The arrests come after similar scandals in the neighbouring borough of Rochdale, which involved networks of mostly Pakistani-origin men targeting overwhelmingly white, non-Muslim girls for sexual abuse and exploitation…..

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

Muslim gang repeatedly raped teen girl over two-year period, police did nothing

“The prosecutor described how nothing was done by police until years later when the victim rang the television studio.”

The police who turned this girl away and did nothing about her allegations were no doubt afraid of being accused of being “racist” and “Islamophobic” if they arrested the members of this Muslim rape gang. But the fault doesn’t lie with them. They’re just low-level functionaries. The fault lies with those who created the society-wide impression that it was more important not to appear “Islamophobic” than to bring justice to these girls. Those include Theresa May and others in the British government, and Leftist activists including Nick Lowles and Fiyaz Mughal, who repeatedly charged those who were calling attention to the Muslim rape gangs with “racism.” If Britain were a sane society, which it most decidedly isn’t, these people would be recognized for the traitors they are, removed from all positions of responsibility and influence, and prosecuted where possible.

“Teenage girl ‘raped by a gang of Asian men during two-year ordeal was finally treated as a victim when her boyfriend phoned TV news studio after she saw report on Rotherham abuse scandal,’” by Abe Hawken, Mailonline, February 27, 2018:

A 16-year-old girl was raped by a gang of Asian men who were finally arrested when her partner phoned a TV news studio after she watched a report on sex abuse, a court heard today.

The girl, who was allegedly abused over a two-year period, asked her partner to call the BBC Look North studio in Yorkshire after viewing their piece which related to the Rotherham sex abuse scandal.

She was a resident of a care home after having a turbulent upbringing when the alleged sexual abuse started, Bradford Crown Court was told.

A jury was told that the girl later ran away from the home with a friend and a bottle of vodka and the pair headed towards the city centre.

The prosecution allege one of the men approached two girls in a car and offered to take them to buy a lighter in 2008, just months after they had both been placed into the care home.

In the months that followed, the girls were subjected to a range of sexual abuse at the hands of the ten men through a variety of different methods ‘to satisfy their sexual desires’, the court was told.

The men subsequently arrested deny a total of 25 charges including rape and sexual assault against the same alleged victim over the period of July 2009 to July 2011.

One of the group, Basharat Khaliq, 37, also allegedly raped a friend of the main victim, who the whole gang are accused of sexually abusing….

One of the charges of rape against him refers to a situation where the girl, who would call the defendant ‘Bash’, was allegedly raped in the front seat of a car.

The court heard how workers at the care home – where both girls lived – had concerns about where they were when they would repeatedly run away – but because it was not a restrictive unit they had no power to stop the teens.

Both girls who had been approached by Khaliq in 2008 were allegedly left on Baildon Moor by the defendant in 2009.

The prosecution said ‘a male was contacted by [the victim] who collected her’. This defendant was Saeed Akhtar, known as ‘Sid’, the prosecution allege.

The property in which much of the abuse is alleged to have taken place is the house in which he lived.

The court was told the second victim was passed between men and repeatedly told she was in a relationship with them in order to cover the abuse.

The prosecutor said the girl was ‘cynically manipulated’ by the defendants, who each visited the house during ‘parties’ which involved drugs and alcohol.

On one occasion, the prosecutor detailed how the victim had taken 22 lines of cocaine in a single night and once addicted to the drug ‘was easy to control’….

The original operation investigated sexual exploitation in Keighley, West Yorkshire.

She said: ‘When girls or suspects were found police were given the task of finding them. On July 13 [the victim’s] phone number cropped up.

‘Her phone number was found on a piece of paper and police contacted her.

‘[The victim] could not give relevant information to the operation; however, she explained her own experience of growing up.

‘She told them she had been given alcohol and drugs and had become an addict. She said she was pleased to see they were investigating.’

The prosecutor described how nothing was done by police until years later when the victim rang the television studio.

She said: ‘By then there was much more coverage of Rotherham. [The victim] had watched and seen news reports knowing what had happened to her.

‘Frustrated at the lack of coverage… her partner contacted Look North, telling them the abuse was ‘much wider than Rotherham’.’…

Khaliq, 37, of Bradford, denies one charge of assault by penetration against the first alleged victim and five charges of rape against a second woman.

Saeed Akhtar, 54, of Bradford, denies two charges of causing or inciting child prostitution and one charge of rape.

Naveed Akhtar, 42, and Izar Hussain, 31, both of Bradford, deny three charges of rape, with Hussain also denying an additional allegation of attempted rape.

Mohammed Usman, 30, of Bradford, and Kieran Harris, 27, of Dewsbury, both pleaded not guilty to two charges of rape.

Yasar Majid, 36, of Milton Keynes, denies a single charge of rape, and Fahim Iqbal, 26, of no fixed abode, pleaded not guilty to aiding and abetting rape.

Zeeshan Ali, 31, of Bradford, denies a single charge of sexual assault.

Parvaze Ahmed, 35, of Bradford, denies three charges of rape….

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

Journalist: The Swedish government has betrayed its girls and women in appeasing Muslim migrants

“The study shows that more than 95 percent of assault violence in Sweden is committed by men of foreign descent.”

And yet instead of naming and prosecuting these men, Swedish authorities devote their efforts to covering this up. The Swedish government has betrayed its people. Yet the people for the most part don’t yet seem to have noticed.

Katerina Janouch

“The state should be sentenced for violation of the Istanbul Convention: A betrayal of Sweden’s girls and women,” translated from “Staten bör ställas till svars för brott mot Istanbulkonventionen: Ett svek mot Sveriges flickor och kvinnor,” by Katerina Janouch, February 25, 2018:

The Swedish state violates the Istanbul Convention, which Sweden signed in 2011, and which came into force in 2014. According to the Istanbul Convention (Article 5.2.), States that accede to the Convention have a responsibility to take the necessary legislative and other measures to prevent, investigate, punish and prosecute violent acts covered by the Convention and committed by non-state actors. As it is now, this does not happen in Sweden. Instead, the sharp increase in crime and sexual offenses causes enormous suffering for the country’s girls and women, and threatens the entire life and health of the Swedish population. Additionally, honor-related violence is increasing. Sweden has failed to protect those whom they undertook to protect. Therefore, they must be held responsible.

“Migrants threaten European women’s rights.” The statement is from the Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, as Slovakia recently refused to sign the Istanbul Convention, which is a legally binding regional instrument on violence against women in Europe. The reason that Slovakia — together with Bulgaria — chooses not to sign the Convention is believed to be regarded as that it is too influenced by appeals that contradict the countries’ more conservative views on, for example, marriage. “All violence against women is unacceptable and has no place in our society,” said Fico. He added that the defense of women’s rights is “particularly important at a time when migrants constitute an increasing part of Europe’s population” and “hold the view of the woman as a ‘submissive creature.’”

Fico’s statement is interesting in several different ways. It also sheds light on Sweden’s so-called feminist government — which signed the Istanbul Convention on the same day it became available for signing — in 2011. In 2014, the convention came into force in Sweden.

So let’s see what the convention means — and whether it is followed in Sweden. The official name of the Istanbul Convention is the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention and Control of Violence against Women and Violence at Home.

* The Convention condemns all forms of violence and describes violence against women as an expression of historically unequal power relations between women and men.

* It establishes that violence against women is gender-related at the structural level. The convention states that women and girls risk being exposed to gender-related violence and domestic violence to a greater extent than men.

* Prevention of violence against women is described as crucial in order to achieve equality between women and men.

* According to the Istanbul Convention (Article 5.2.), States that accede to the Convention have a responsibility to take the necessary legislative and other measures to prevent, investigate, punish and prosecute acts of violence covered by the Convention committed by non-state actors.

Does this really happen in Sweden? Or are these just some nice words in line with others that are not actually enforced?

* The Istanbul Convention contains both civil and criminal law provisions. Among other things, the states that accede to the Convention agree to criminalize psychological violence (Article 33), stalking (Article 34), physical violence (Article 35), sexual violence, including rape (Article 36), forced marriages (Article 37), genital mutilation (Article 38) and forced abortion and forced sterilization (Article 39).

This is not how the situation actually looks today in Sweden. In our country of the fine feminist government, threats, persecution, victims, harassment, rape and killing of women are threatened on a daily basis. Many perpetrators that are convicted are given ridiculously light punishment. Girls who are harassed at school often get moved, while the perpetrators remain. Girls are beaten and injured in the home. Women are threatened, harassed and injured by both close relatives, but also by strangers, in an increasing number of cases of assault violence. However, states that accede to the Convention are supposed to adopt and implement, at a national level, an effective, comprehensive and coordinated policy to prevent and combat all forms of violence against women and domestic violence (Article 7). The work of NGOs and civil society must be acknowledged, encouraged and supported (Article 9). States shall designate or establish public bodies responsible for coordinating, implementing, monitoring and evaluating policies and measures to prevent and combat violence (Article 10). The States will also regularly collect statistics and support research (Article 11).

But here is what is happening in Sweden. Swedish authorities, with BRÅ at the forefront, refuse to collect statistics about those who commit sexual assault. They are blaming everything else possible, while police and lawyers and crime victims testify that violence originating from criminal immigrants is increasing. In Sweden, we have had group violence not only against girls and women, but also against boys, and sexual violence has become colder; it has even been described as “torture-like” on some occasions. A civilian study of the origin of offenders has, in the absence of another, been made by a private individual. The study shows that more than 95 percent of assault violence in Sweden is committed by men of foreign descent. But society does not take any of this into account. In this way, Sweden is in severe violation of the Istanbul Convention….

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

Muslim migrant who raped teenage girl held sharp piece of wood to her throat and said: ‘You cannot be a virgin because you are white’

In the UK, “white” means non-Muslim.

Sex slavery is sanctioned under Islam. As I have explained numerous times, sex slavery and rape of the infidel is sanctioned and rewarded under Islam. Muslim clerics all over the world confirm the right to have sex slaves. It is in the Qur’an — the word of Allah.

MAN WHO RAPED TEENAGE GIRL HELD SHARP PIECE OF WOOD TO HER THROAT AND SAID: ‘YOU CANNOT BE A VIRGIN BECAUSE YOU ARE WHITE’

Ahmed Abdoule

Ahmed Abdoule, 33, has been jailed for 11 years at Hull Crown Court

A rapist held a sharp piece of wood to a teenage girl’s throat and told her “my country would love you” in a horrifying attack.

Ahmed Abdoule, 33, of west Hull, told the girl it was impossible she could be a virgin “because she was white”.

He also pulled her top over her head so he did not have to look at her while he raped her.

Hull Crown Court heard the girl “pleaded” with Abdoule to let her go during the horrifying ordeal.

The court heard Abdoule, a Somalian national, was known to the woman and took her to his home.

Once inside, Abdoule “locked the door” as the girl “cried and pleaded” with him to let her go.

Abdoule “jabbed a sharp piece of wood into her stomach” as he forced her upstairs, and then held the weapon against her throat as he raped her.

Judge Mark Bury told Abdoule: “She told you she was a virgin to try and get you to stop.

“You said to her, ‘You cannot be, you are white’.

“You told her not to look at you, and pulled her top over her face, telling her you did not want to see her while you were raping her.”

After he had raped her, Abdoule told his victim he had “liked it,” and that she was “not the only girl who was going to get punished”.

He also said to her: “My country would love you.”

When he dropped the teenager off a distance away from his home, Abdoule gave her a new top to wear, and told her “to cherish it”.

He also told her he would kill her if she told anyone what had happened.

Abdoule denied rape, but was found guilty after a trial and was sentenced to 11 years in prison.

In a victim statement, the teenager said she still did not feel safe in her own home.

She said: “I don’t seem able to talk to boys or men anymore, as I feel uneasy doing so.

“Mum lets me go a bit further from the house than last summer, but I always let her know where I am.

“I used to go missing and stay out late, and mum used to nag me, telling me stuff could happen to me.

“I never listened. She was right.”

The victim’s mum also wrote a statement.

In it, she said she felt she had “failed her as a mum.”

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story – and it’s every story – it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

VIDEO: French Judge Orders Jail for Islamic ‘Reformer’ Tariq Ramadan Over Rape Charges

A judge in France just ruled that a prominent Islamic scholar arrested and jailed on preliminary rape charges must stay behind bars.

The ruling was apparently fueled by the recommendations of the prosecutor’s office.

The case involves Tariq Ramadan, who was placed under investigation just a few days ago for incidents that allegedly occurred in 2009 and 2012.

Here’s a previous interview with Ramadan:

Robert Spencer with Jihad Watch writes:

I blinked at the AP headline. It is so rare to see justice done to the wealthy and powerful, especially someone who has for so long been the darling of the political and media elites, I couldn’t believe it at first. Ramadan will still likely skate: there are too many well-placed Muslim Brotherhood operatives and sympathizers in the government of France, and governments all over the West, for any other outcome to be likely. Still, the thought of him behind bars must bring some small comfort to his accusers, who have detailed far greater horrors to which he subjected them.

It is useful to remember that some people knew for years about Tariq Ramadan’s behavior. Bernard Godard, who was the “Monsieur Islam” of the French Ministry of the Interior and knew Ramadan well, said: “That he had many mistresses, that he consulted sites, that girls were brought to the hotel at the end of his lectures, that he invited them to undress, that some resisted and that he could become violent and aggressive, yes, but I have never heard of rapes, I am stunned.”

Why didn’t Godard act, knowing that “some” of the women whom Tariq Ramadan “invited to undress…resisted and that he could become violent and aggressive”? You know the answer: “Monsieur Islam” was afraid of being smeared as an “Islamophobe.” Tariq Ramadan’s entire rise to positions of influence and power can be attributed solely and wholly to his pose as a “Muslim reformer,” and to the Western intelligentsia’s avid desire to showcase such people in order to show that they are not “Islamophobic,” and are on board with the diversity/multiculturalism project. His rise certainly cannot be attributed to his wisdom and insight.

This was the story from AP:

A French judge decided on Tuesday to keep prominent Islamic scholar Tariq Ramadan in detention, four days after he was handed preliminary rape charges in cases alleged by women who sought his counsel.

A judicial official, who wasn’t authorized to speak publicly about the cases, said the decision followed the recommendation of the prosecutor’s office.

Ramadan was placed under investigation on Feb. 2 for an alleged rape resulting from a 2009 encounter and for the alleged rape of a vulnerable person in a 2012 case. Both women filed the complaints last year.

Ramadan, in custody since Jan. 31, denies any wrongdoing.

Ramadan had sought to buy some time before the judge ordered him kept in decision, saying last week after being charged that he wanted to postpone the required “debate” before any decision on remaining in jail. The tactic apparently didn’t work.

Ramadan, 55, is on leave from Britain’s Oxford University, where he is a professor of contemporary Islamic studies. He travels frequently and has written numerous books on Islam and the integration of Muslims in Europe.

It was not known how long he could remain locked up. Under French law, the order to hold him in “provisional detention” can last one year and include two consecutive six-month renewals thereafter. However, a suspect’s time in custody can be cut short at any time if a judge agrees detention is no longer warranted….

The judicial official said that in ordering Ramadan to remain in jail, the judge was either weighing the well-being of the women behind the case or assuring that the scholar does not leave France while the investigation is in progress. …

RELATED ARTICLES:

Canadian PM Trudeau: Sharia law is compatible with democracy

Obamagate: FBI Clinton Investigators Implicate Obama, “POTUS wants to know everything”

Newly Released FBI Text: Strzok-Page Used Untraceable Phones When ‘Talking About Hillary’

WATCH: Pamela Geller on Social Media Network Panel on Suppression of Free Speech

At Vatican, Erdogan asks Pope to help lead “concerted and continuous international effort to fight Islamophobia”

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story – and it’s every story – it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

Berlin’s ‘safe zone’ for women fails to prevent New Year’s Eve sex assaults

“The creation of the safety area was heavily criticised by a German police union boss. He said it communicates a ‘devastating message’: ‘By doing so, one is saying there are safe zones and unsafe zones’ for women, a message that could result in ‘the end of equality, freedom of movement and self-determination’, he said.”

Yes, that’s exactly where it is leading, and that destination is called Sharia, aka, Merkel’s legacy.

“Several women sexually assaulted in Berlin during NYE: Safety area a total failure,” Voice of Europe, January 1, 2018:

Berlin’s newly constructed “safety area” for women, could not prevent several sexual assaults during the city’s New Year’s Eve celebrations.

At this moment, at least 13 cases were reported to the police and seven suspects were arrested in the German capital. Police refused to provide information about the ethnicity or the nationality of the perpetrators.

Near midnight, Berlin’s police tweeted that they were receiving the first reports of sexual assaults, a fact that was quickly picked up by German media….

The creation of the safety area was heavily criticised by a German police union boss. He said it communicates a “devastating message”:

“By doing so, one is saying there are safe zones and unsafe zones” for women, a message that could result in “the end of equality, freedom of movement and self-determination”, he said.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Egypt: Muslim murders two Christians in New Year attack on liquor store

PBS Broadcasts Crusade Myths for the Holiday Season

Ten more Muslims on trial for operating massive ‘cynical and predatory’ child sex ring with girls 13 to 15

The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.

Meanwhile, authorities in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain largely remain too afraid of charges of “racism” and “Islamophobia” to do much of anything about the phenomenon of Muslim rape gangs.

“Ten men on trial for historic sex offences,” by Will Walker, Oxford Mail, December 14, 2017:

A GANG of ten men accused of operating a ‘cynical and predatory’ child sex ring on a ‘massive’ scale across Oxford are currently on trial, it can be revealed.

The major trial into alleged child sexual exploitation, which began at Oxford Crown Court on October 9, is expected to last until January but for legal reasons can only now be reported.

The men all deny a number of sex offences including conspiracy, rape, supplying drugs and indecent assault on young girls between 1998 and 2005….

The prosecution has said the men coerced the girls into sex at a number of locations across Oxford, including at guest houses, in cars, and at local parks.

The six alleged victims, none of who can be named for legal reasons, were all from Oxford and aged between 13 and 15 at the time.

The jury of four women and eight men has heard accounts from the girls, who are now women, as well as police interviews and statements from the defendants.

One alleged victim recounted how she was pushed onto a bed at an address in Cowley and raped by two of the men.

She was beaten with a slab of wood while the men sexually abused her and hurled nail varnish remover in her face the court heard.

Giving evidence earlier in the trial she told jurors: “I tried to push him off but he was stronger than me. [I was] slapped in the face with an open hand twice.

“They hit the back of the arms and the back of the legs with the plank, mainly on the torso area. It was painful.”

The court heard she told police in interview she was ‘screaming’ during the alleged ordeal and had begged them to stop.

In other instances of alleged abuse, the girls were also plied with drink and drugs as part of what prosecutors called the ‘grooming process’ and took part in ‘sex parties’ at a number of addresses across Oxford and one in London involving groups of men.

The court was told some of the men would take the girls to local parks in and around Oxford where they would be raped and sexually abused.

One alleged victim, aged 14 at the time, told police she recalled ‘feeling sick’ afterwards after being sexually assaulted.

Later, the girl was locked inside an Oxford guest house by one of the defendants and forced to jump off a second-floor balcony to escape.

Another told police that: “[They] made you believe they actually cared about you, and they actually don’t.

“Like you are something important to them, that you are a friend to them. And, really, it wasn’t that.

“It was just to get what they want, it took me some years to realise that.”

The men each deny all of the charges levied against them and their defence started this week.

One of the defendants who is accused of one count of rape at a flat in London, Saboor Abdul, took to the witness box yesterday.

Denying anything illicit took place at the flat he told jurors: “Nothing untoward happened. There was chit-chat; conversation and video games.

“It was a relaxed, warm atmosphere. There was no drama.”

He added he was at university when the offence he is accused of is alleged to have taken place, he had been ‘studious’ and ‘a bit of a geek’ and he had no romantic or sexual interest in girls at the time.

The trial continues.

The accused men are:

Raheem Ahmed, 40, of Starwort Path, Oxford, denies two counts of indecent assault, one of false imprisonment, one of rape and another of conspiracy to commit indecent assault.

Haji Khan, 37, of Littlegreen Lane, Birmingham, denies one count of indecent assault and one of conspiracy to rape.

Moinul Islam, 41, of Wykeham Crescent, Oxford, denies two counts of indecent assault, one count of rape, one count of false imprisonment and another of supplying a drug of Class B to another.

Kamran Khan, of Northfield Road, Bolton, denies one count of indecent assault, one count of rape and another of false imprisonment.

Kameer Iqbal, 38, of Dashwood Road, Oxford, denies three counts of rape.

Khalid Hussain, 37, of Ashhurst Way, Oxford, denies one count of indecent assault and two counts of rape.

Saboor Abdul, 37, of Oxford Road, Cowley, denies one count of rape.

An unnamed 47-year old denies one count of indecent assault.

An unnamed 36-year old denies three counts of indecent assault, two counts of rape and two counts of conspiracy to rape.

An unnamed 37-year old denies one count of indecent assault, one count of kidnapping and another of false imprisonment.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Oklahoma: Muslim who beheaded coworker gets death penalty

Miss Iraq and her family forced to flee Iraq after getting death threats over her selfie with Miss Israel