Swedish mother of toddler gang raped and filmed by three Muslim ‘child’ refugees

The elites, the enemedia, academia, and cultural influencers see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil when it comes to the massive migration into the West. They are so militant about allowing the invasion, leftwing victims of sexual attacks are discouraged from reporting the crimes as it might reflect poorly on the migrants.

The ghastly rape epidemic roiling Europe – a result of the hijrah (immigration jihad) — isn’t actually happening if the press won’t report it on it, right? And anyone who does shine a light on it, is destroyed – defamed, libeled and marginalized. No one is exempt, not even the President of the United States. On the contrary, it makes him more of a target by enemedia elite.

Is it any wonder President Trump won?

Sweden the ‘Rape Capital’ of Europe.

SWEDISH MOTHER OF TODDLER GANG RAPED BY THREE “CHILD” REFUGEES – THEY EVEN TOOK PHOTOS

A woman from Kalmar was gang raped by three Afghans after a dinner party, Fria Tider reports. The refugees violently assaulted the woman during a walk. They made fun of her, raped her and took very disturbing pictures of her during the attack.In September 2017 the woman, a mother of a toddler, had a dinner party at her and her husband’s residence in Kalmar. In the evening she took a walk and when she began to feel unwell, she rang her husband. Just after the refugee “minors” appeared and began following her.Having followed her a little while, they attacked her and forced her down a small road. “They laughed at me like it was fun. They pulled down my trousers and panties”, the victim said during the trial.

The three Afghans all raped her. Fortunately for her, she was later found by the police, who had been contacted by her troubled husband.

When the woman got home from hospital she was in terrible condition. “I hope I never see her like that again”, said the husband during the trial.

In connection with the gang rape, the child refugees also took photographs of the woman. The pictures show her when she was on the ground while one rapist held her hand on her chest, pointing her middle finger toward her.

The District Court said that “by taking photographs, the perpetrators have shown a particular ruthlessness and cruelty”.

Two of the Afghans have been identified and sentenced by the Kalmar District Court to youth care. One is sentenced for 11 months and the other one for 1 year and 2 months. Both will also be expelled from Sweden.

The woman was traumatised by the horrible experience but is trying to remain strong for her children’s sake. Though she now no longer dares to go out after dark, avoids crowds and has been in therapy since the attack.

RELATED ARTICLE: More than 56 per cent of crimes in German town are committed by asylum seekers

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story - and it’s every story - it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

Islamic State (ISIS) ex-emir hiding among migrants en route to Europe

And millions more are expected. Europe is dead, long live Eurabia.

DAESH EX-EMIR HIDING AMONG MIGRANTS EN ROUTE TO EUROPE ARRESTED IN TURKEY

Daesh ex-emir hiding among migrants en route to Europe arrested in Turkey

Turkish authorities have announced that they have arrested Kasir al-Haddawi, a relative of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and an ex-emir of ISIS in Deir ez-Zor, according to the Sunday Times. He reportedly tried to merge with Syrian refugees to reach Greece.

Kasir al-Haddawi, a former “emir” of Daesh in the province of Deir ez-Zor, now controlled by Syrian authorities , was captured on 27 April by security forces in the city of Izmir, according to Turkish authorities quoted by the British newspaper The Sunday Times .

He was reportedly arrested while hiding among a group of Syrian refugees who planned to embark on a boat to reach Greece. Three other members of ISIS have been arrested with him, according to Turkish media.

The Turkish authorities say that Kasir al-Haddawi is close to the head of the Islamic State, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, whose death has been announced several times without being confirmed . The Turkish news agency Anadolu claims that Kasir al-Haddawi is responsible for the massacre of 700 civilians in Deir ez-Zor when he was acting as “emir” of the jihadist group.

The question of the exploitation of migrant flows to Europe by jihadist organizations has been a problem for European leaders for several years. As early as July 2016, German Chancellor Angela Merkel – who had decided in 2015 to host about a million migrants in her country – had said that the waves of migration were being exploited by terrorist groups to bring in some of their men. In fact, several attacks in Europe in recent years have been committed by individuals who have applied for asylum in countries where they have acted. This is the case of the perpetrators of the Berlin or Hamburg attacks , committed in December 2016 and July 2017 respectively. Another example: in June 2017, the Italian police arrested an Iraqi asylum seeker who was planning an attack.

SOURCES:

https://francais.rt.com/international/50237-lieutenant-daesh-qui-se-cachait-parmi-refugies-rejoindre-europe-arrete-turquie

RELATED ARTICLES:

Europol claims successful crackdown on ISIS propaganda

The influx of Daesh fighters on its southern border worries Spain

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story - and it’s every story - it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

‘Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance,’ said Barack Obama. Let’s test his theory.

Obama in Cairo.

In his famous outreach speech to the Islamic world from Cairo on June 4, 2009, Barack Obama said:

Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition. I saw it firsthand as a child in Indonesia, where devout Christians worshiped freely in an overwhelmingly Muslim country.

Let’s test his theory. Here are a few notable facts you will discover in my forthcoming book, The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS:

  • The Christian Patriarch who lamented that the Arab conquest of Jerusalem was characterized by “so much destruction and plunder” and “incessant outpourings of human blood”;
  • The Muslim leader who had the Colossus of Rhodes sold off as scrap metal because for him, it wasn’t a “wonder of the world,” it was just an artifact of jahiliyya, pre-Islamic ignorance;
  • The Muslim leader who wrote to the Byzantine Emperor, a Christian, demanding that he “renounce this Jesus and convert to the great God whom I serve. If not, how will this Jesus be able to save you from my hands?”;
  • The caliph who exhorted his governors not to lenient on the non-Muslims, saying: “The non-Muslims are nothing but dirt. Allah has created them to be partisans of Satan”;
  • The Muslim leader who gave ruthless orders to the Muslim invaders of India: “Kill anyone belonging to the combatants; arrest their sons and daughters for hostages and imprison them”;
  • How the Muslim Spain that Obama praised became a center of the Islamic slave trade, where Muslim buyers could purchase non-Muslim sex-slave girls as young as eleven years old, as well as slave boys for sex as well, or slave boys raised to become slave soldiers;
  • The Islamic warrior who fought without mercy against the Hindus in India: “the blood of the infidels flowed so copiously that the stream was discolored”;
  • The Islamic caliphate that made it a regular practice to seize the children of Christian families, convert them to Islam, and train them as slave soldiers;
  • The Muslim reformer who gained a large following among Muslims by personally stoning an accused adulteress to death;
  • The real story of how the Sphinx lost its nose (no, Napoleon’s troops did not shoot it off during target practice);
  • Much, much more.

“Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance” — Barack Obama is gone from the White House, but many people believe that to this day, and such assumptions influence public policy. Discover what really happened and get the whole truth in The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS. Click here to preorder now.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

VIDEO: What Linda Sarsour won’t tell you about Islamic [Sharia] Law

Last week, while getting my part in David Wood’s “Islamicize Me” project on video, I took a break to film some segments for Jon McCray’s “Whaddo You Meme??” YouTube show. Here is one on Sharia.

RELATED ARTICLE: Video: The Nigerian Persecution (of Christians, by Muslims) No One Is Talking About

EDITORS NOTE: This video originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

VIDEO: Hamas Pays Muslims to Get Shot by IDF

This new edition of The Jamie Glazov Moment features Jamie discussing Hamas Pays Muslims to Get Shot by IDF, where he offers yet another harrowing glimpse into a cult of death.

Don’t miss it!

Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.

EDITORS NOTE: Please donate through our Pay Pal account to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Thank you!

Jizya, ‘Military Exemption,’ and Murdered Christian Soldiers by Raymond Ibrahim

John Esposito

One of the staples of the Islamic whitewashing industry is the claim that jizya — the extortion money subjugated Jews and Christians were required to pay (a la Koran 9:29) — actually “entitled them to Muslim protection from outside aggression and exempted them from military service,” to quote Georgetown University’s John Esposito.

By this widely held logic, Muslim invaders did not demand that the conquered infidel populations ransom their lives with money — as virtually all Muslim jurists explain it — but rather were kind enough to offer their non-Muslim subjects “protection” and exemption from military service for a small fee.

The irony, of course, is that this claim continues to be contradicted by the deeds of Muslims in the modern era. Most recently, on March 14, Matthew Samir Habib, a 22-year-old Coptic Christian in Egypt’s military was killed by his Muslim counterparts — simply for being Christian. He is merely the latest of about nine Christian soldiers to be killed in recent months and years by Muslim soldiers on account of their faith.

And in virtually every case, a similar pattern follows: despite all the evidence otherwise (such as physical bruises all over the bodies of the slain), military officials insist that — due to some sudden and inexplicable bout of depression — all these Christians supposedly committed “suicide”; meanwhile, the dead Christian soldiers’ families and those closest to them insist their slain sons and brothers were happy and healthy, that they were observant Christians, and that there was evidence that they were being persecuted by their Muslim “brothers-in-arms” for their evident Christianity.

For example, in this latest case from March 14, the murdered Copt was shot twice — and still authorities maintain it was suicide. (Click here for several more examples of military authorities offering strange reasons for the deaths, and Christian families rejecting them.)

Why these Christians were killed is not difficult to comprehend. For many Muslims in Egypt and elsewhere, war is synonymous with jihad — and it doesn’t do much for morale to have lowly infidels fighting alongside would-be jihadis.

From here we understand why Christians and Jews were truly “exempt” from military service: not because they paid jizya-tribute, but because, as conquered infidels, they themselves were the enemy and had to remain separate and subjugated — as Egypt’s Copts remain to this day. (As one example, their requests to open or renovate churches are always met with mass violence and upheavals, often enabled if not instigated by local Muslim authorities: as infidels, Christians are not allowed to build or renovate temples of worship that openly challenge the teachings of Muhammad.)

Apologists such as Esposito twist the facts around in another important way: while payment of jizya did indeed purchase “protection” (of a sort) for the conquered infidels, that protection was never against an outside hostile force, but against inside hostile forces — that is, Muslims themselves: sharia manuals make clear that failure to pay jizya made the lives of dhimmis forfeit.

Finally, that the Koran itself requires conquered non-Muslims “to give the jizya willingly while they are humbled” (9:29), puts to rest any claim that payment of jizya was a mere business transaction but rather a ritual show of Islamic dominance over — and contempt for — infidels.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

Horrific photo: Gaza’s Grenade Baby

The left’s idea of “peace partners.” And the intended targets are the “villains.”

Photo thanks to Mark via Tsahi Hagag.

RELATED ARTICLE: Israel Versus Hamas: The Case for Moral Clarity

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story - and it’s every story - it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

Former Obama State Department official who is a Muslim likens opposition to jihad terror to bigotry against Jews, blacks, Chinese

Wa’el N. Alzayat is CEO of EmergeUSA

In its lengthy hit piece on Mike Pompeo and John Bolton, which I discussed at length here, the New York Times says this about Secretary of State-designate Mike Pompeo’s opposition to jihad terror and Sharia oppression:

Wa’el N. Alzayat, who was a Middle East expert at the State Department and senior policy adviser to Samantha Power, the former United Nations ambassador, said of Mr. Pompeo’s comments, “Imagine if this stuff had been said about Jews, or African-Americans or Chinese-Americans. And yet, we’re living with an administration that is actually rewarding people with racist views or racist associations with some of the highest positions in our government.”

Right, Wa’el. “Imagine if this stuff had been said about Jews, or African-Americans or Chinese-Americans.” Yeah, and imagine if the stuff that was said about Charles Manson had been said about your Aunt Rose. Wa’el N. Alzayat is relying on people’s ignorance about Islamic doctrine and history. Nothing in the history of the Jews, African-Americans (except for the Nation of Islam, the Black Panthers, etc.) or Chinese-Americans is remotely comparable to the 1,400-year war of Islamic jihadis against the rest of the world, which has raged without respite or reformation against Europe, Africa, Central Asia, India, and beyond.

But few Americans know this history, and even fewer know the truly shocking extent of the global devastation that jihad has caused. That’s why I wrote my forthcoming book The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS, which you can preorder here now. The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS is the first and only comprehensive one-volume history of jihad, not just against Europe and the West, but in India and worldwide, in the English language. It’s the first book to tell the whole truth about Islam’s bloody history in an age when Islamic jihadis are more assertive in Western countries than they have been for centuries.

RELATED ARTICLE: New York Times’ Laurie Goodstein attacks Pompeo and Bolton for daring to notice there’s a jihad threat

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch. Equip yourself to counter the lies that are so casually told by the likes Wa’el N. Alzayat. Preorder The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS.

Swedish government commissions, then withdraws under pressure, leaflet approving of child marriage

Why would the Swedish government issue this leaflet in the first place? Because child marriage is approved in Islam, and the Swedish government knows who the new masters of Sweden are.

“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria

“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law

There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council

“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology

Hadiths that Muslims consider authentic record that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:

“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).

Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).

Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.

Marrying young girls was not all that unusual for its time, but because in Islam Muhammad is the supreme example of conduct (cf. Qur’an 33:21), he is considered exemplary in this unto today. And so in April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.

Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:

The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.

Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”

According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.

“The National Board of Social Affairs withdraws ‘pedophile leaflet’ – was commissioned by the government,” translated from “Socialstyrelsen drar tillbaka ‘pedofilfolder’ – togs fram på uppdrag av regeringen,” Fria Tider, March 29, 2018 (thanks to Denny):

Domestic. After the morning’s quick and very powerful reactions to the National Board of Health’s new folder “Information for you who is married to a child,” the authority now withdraws the information sheet, which in social media has been accused of being a brochure for pedophiles.

It was on Thursday morning that it was discovered that the National Board of Health and Welfare published a leaflet entitled “Adapting to adults who are married to a child”.

The folder states, among other things, that it is “inappropriate for you to live together if the child is under 15 years” because it is forbidden to have sex with children under 15 in Sweden.

Nowhere in the text is there anything about prison.

In the magazine you can also read that “The Social Service may suggest that you do not live together for a shorter or longer period.”

The National Board of Health and Welfare also writes in the magazine that: “Both the Social Service and the Migration Board will work to give the child the opportunity to express his or her own opinion, where to live and how it wants it.”

“The illustrations are insensitive, it might have been suitable for information about school start or something else neutral,” says journalist Sakine Madon to SVT, pointing out that formulations like being “inappropriate if you live together” are far too soft, because child marriage is such a serious phenomenon.

After very strong reactions, the National Board of Health has decided to withdraw the material.

“The material has raised strong reactions and many views. We pull back the material and look over it, “said Petra Rinman, Unit Manager for Knowledge Center for Single Children, in a press release.

According to the National Board of Health and Welfare, the material has been developed within the framework of a government assignment to develop and disseminate information to children who are declared married, spouses, parents and other related persons with information about current laws and practice in Sweden.

The material is said to have been developed based on existing legislation.

“Sweden does not allow anyone under the age of 18 to be married in this country. However, according to current legislation, the main rule is that a marriage valid under the law of the country in which it is concluded is to be recognized in civil law in Sweden. New legislation is currently being prepared by the government, “said Pär Ödman, Chief Legal Officer of the National Board of Health.

The proposed preparation proposes “additional restrictions” for child marriages, the National Board of Health and Welfare writes. However, not a total ban.

In social media, many responded vigorously to the folder, and claimed, among other things, that it is a brochure for pedophiles….

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Jihad Watch.

Muslim gang of seven ‘predatory’ men abused girls as young as 13 in a ‘rape wagon’

Once again we see that all the perpetrators are Muslims. The UK authorities and media insist that these rape gangs are not a specifically Muslim phenomenon, yet the perpetrators are almost entirely Muslim, and the victims non-Muslim. Why? Because the abuse of non-Muslim girls and women in this way is sanctioned in Islam. But British authorities have again and again shown that they’re so afraid of appearing to be “racist” that they let these gangs operate for years, and British politicians and media still routinely lie about why this is happening.

“Child sex gang of seven ‘predatory’ men who abused girls as young as 13 in a ‘s*** wagon’ with number plate ending ‘SHG’ are convicted after jury took 24 DAYS to reach their verdict,” by Bridie Pearson-Jones, Mailonline, March 24, 2018 (thanks to Lukasz):

A sex gang of seven ‘predatory’ men have been convicted of abusing young girls.

The group of seven men aged between 37 and 47 were described as ‘predatory and cynical’ by a judge after being convicted on Friday following a five-month trial, at Oxford Crown Court.

The court heard how the gang would often abuse girls aged between 13 and 15 in a ‘s wagon’ with licence plate ending ‘SHG’.

A jury of four women and seven men took a record-breaking 107 hours and 31 minutes, over the course of 24 days, to reach their verdict.

The charges faced by the men, who each denied their part in the child sexual exploitation, included indecent assault, rape, and false imprisonment, on five victims between 1998 and 2005.

During the trial, Oxford Crown Court heard accounts from the victims, all of whom were aged between 13 and 15 at the time, who said they were plied with drink and drugs and took part in sex parties.

A number of the women also recalled a vehicle driven by the men regularly referred to as the ‘shag wagon’ – with a licence plate ending ‘SHG’.

Judge Peter Ross, who presided over the trial, said once the final verdicts were handed out: ‘Systematic and widespread grooming, that is what this case has revealed.

‘The investigation has involved countless hours of work and [the police] are entitled to commendations for the work they have done.’

He also thanked jurors for their ‘assidious’ and ‘phenomenal’ dedication to the case in returning their verdicts, following the longest jury deliberation in Oxford Crown Court history.

The lengthy trial saw seven defendants convicted – Raheem Ahmed, Moinul Islam, Kamran Khan, Kameer Iqbal, Khalid Hussain, Alladitta Yousaf and Assad Hussain.

Two others who stood trial, Saboor Abdul and Haji Khan, were acquitted of all charges. Two other men involved in proceedings cannot be named for legal reasons.

The court heard throughout the trial how the seven men on numerous occasions coerced the girls into sex at a number of addresses across Oxford.

These included at guest houses, in cars parked at lay-bys, and at local parks….

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report. Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story - and it’s every story - it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.